Types of urethral catheter for reducing symptomatic urinary tract infections in hospitalised adults requiring short-term catheterisation
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN75198618 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN75198618 |
| Protocol serial number | HTA 05/46/01 |
| Sponsor | University of Aberdeen (UK) |
| Funder | Health Technology Assessment Programme |
- Submission date
- 22/01/2007
- Registration date
- 26/01/2007
- Last edited
- 14/07/2016
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Urological and Genital Diseases
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
A urinary catheter is a flexible tube that is used to drain the bladder and collect urine. About 1 in 4 patients in hospital need a urinary catheter for a short while. This may cause a urine infection in about 7% of them, amounting to about 30,000 patients per year in the UK. These infections are important because they slow patients' recovery from illness or surgery and can lead to serious consequences such as bloodstream infections. The 15% reduction in such infections called for in the NHS Plan is hard to achieve as, unfortunately, the catheters always become contaminated with bacteria from the patient's own skin or bowel. For every day that the catheter is left in, bacteria colonise the urine in about 5% of patients. Simple measures such as general hygiene and taking the catheters out as soon as possible help to reduce the overall risk of developing a urine infection. Recently it has been shown that catheters containing antibiotics or antiseptics such as silver reduce colonisation by bacteria and may lessen the risk of infection. However, these catheters are expensive and it is not clear how much they benefit patients and whether the increased costs are matched by better health. The aim of this study is to compare the use of standard catheters with catheters containing antibiotics or antiseptics in patients who only need a catheter for a short time (less than 2 weeks).
Who can participate?
Patients aged 16 or over who need a catheter as part of their routine care
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to have either a standard or a treated catheter. They are asked to fill in questionnaires in hospital and after they go home to find out whether a urine infection occurred and if this affected their health, treatment or hospital stay. The costs and benefits of each type of catheter are then compared to see whether one is better than another for routine use in the NHS. Sub-groups of patients who are vulnerable to severe infection, such as the elderly and those in intensive care, are also studied to see whether treated catheters might particularly benefit them.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The results of the study will allow the NHS to decide whether, for short-term use, catheters containing antibiotics or antiseptics reduce infections, result in better patient health and are cost-effective.
Where is the study run from?
University of Aberdeen (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
February 2007 to October 2010
Who is funding the study?
Health Technology Assessment Programme (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Prof. James N'Dow
j.ndow@abdn.ac.uk
Contact information
Scientific
Academic Urology Department
2nd Floor
Health Sciences Building
Foresterhill
Aberdeen
ABS5 2ZD
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)1224 553014 |
|---|---|
| j.ndow@abdn.ac.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Three-arm randomised controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Types of urethral catheter for reducing symptomatic urinary tract infections in hospitalised adults requiring short-term catheterisation: a randomised controlled trial |
| Study acronym | CATHETER |
| Study objectives | The hypothesis being tested is that use of either of the impregnated catheters will reduce the incidence of catheter associated symptomatic urinary tract infection by 40% relative to the standard PolyTetraFluoroEthylene (PTFE) coated latex catheter (an absolute reduction of around 3%). More details can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hta/054601 Protocol can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/51203/PRO-05-46-01.pdf |
| Ethics approval(s) | Grampian Local Research Ethics Committee (1), 07/12/2006, ref: 06/S0801/110 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Urinary tract infections |
| Intervention | Three-arm randomised controlled trial testing three short-term urinary catheter policies in a range of high-volume clinical settings. Participants are randomised at each ward within each centre minimised by age, sex, and whether or not participants received prophylactic or concurrent antibiotic treatment. There are two experimental groups managed with: 1. Silver alloy impregnated hydrogel urethral catheter. 2. Nitrofurazone impregnated silicone urethral catheter. The control group is managed with a PTFE coated latex urethral catheter - the standard control. |
| Intervention type | Device |
| Phase | |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Current primary outcome measures as of 15/05/2009: |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Secondary outcome measures as of 15/05/2009: |
| Completion date | 31/10/2010 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 5700 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Adult patients (both males and females, more than or equal to 16 years of age) 2. Requiring urethral catheterisation (expected to be required for a maximum of two weeks) 3. Pre-selected units with a high volume of short-term catheterisation |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Patients for whom urinary catheterisation is expected to be long-term (i.e. more than 14 days) 2. Urological intervention or instrumentation within preceding seven days (e.g. catheterisation, cystoscopy, prostatic biopsy and nephrostomy insertion) 3. Non-urethral catheterisation (e.g. suprapubic catheterisation) 4. Known allergy to any of the following: latex, silver salts, hydrogel, silicone or nitrofurazone |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/02/2007 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/10/2010 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
ABS5 2ZD
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 01/11/2012 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | results | 01/12/2012 | Yes | No | |
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
| Study website | Study website | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
Editorial Notes
14/07/2016: Plain English summary added.
06/05/2009: the following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The scientific title was added.
2. The overall trial end date was changed from 31/10/2009 to 31/10/2010.