A randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the effect of sedation on combined diagnostic cervical and lumbar facet joint nerve blocks

ISRCTN ISRCTN76376497
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN76376497
Secondary identifying numbers 7
Submission date
21/06/2005
Registration date
22/06/2005
Last edited
16/08/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Laxmaiah Manchikanti
Scientific

2831 Lone Oak Road
Paducah, KY
42003
United States of America

Phone +1 270 554 8373
Email drm@asipp.org

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Scientific title
Study objectivesTo demonstrate the lack of effect of sedation on the validity of diagnostic cervical and lumbar facet joint nerve blocks.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedBack pain
InterventionPatients with combined chronic neck and low back pain of facet joint origin identified with controlled, comparative local anesthetic nerve blocks will receive intravenous injection of sodium chloride solution, midazolam, or fentanyl prior to lumbar facet joint nerve blocks under fluoroscopy.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Sodium chloride solution, midazolam and fentanyl
Primary outcome measure1. Comparison of midazolam and fentanyl with placebo (sodium chloride injection)
2. To demonstrate a lack of clinically significant difference in the treatment groups after 10 minutes post-treatment in the:
2.1 Numeric pain scale in neck and low back
2.2 Ability to perform the painful movements in neck and low back, which were painful prior to intravenous administration of sedation
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration
Overall study start date01/05/2004
Completion date31/10/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsA total of 60 patients, randomized into 3 groups with equal size
Key inclusion criteria1. Subjects between 18 and 90 years of age
2. Subjects with a history of chronic, function limiting, low back and neck pain of at least 6 months in duration
3. Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this investigation
4. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, are able to understand this investigation, and/or co-operate with the investigational procedures
5. Subjects should have undergone diagnostic facet joint blocks and the combined diagnostic cervical and lumbar facet joint pain has been confirmed previously
Key exclusion criteria1. Absence of combined cervical and lumbar facet joint pain
2. Uncontrolled major depression or uncontrolled psychiatric disorders
3. Women who are pregnant or lactating
4. Patients with multiple complaints involving multiple other problems which have overlapping pain complaints
5. Inability to achieve appropriate positioning and inability to understand informed consent and protocol
6. History of adverse reaction to either midazolam or fentanyl
Date of first enrolment01/05/2004
Date of final enrolment31/10/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United States of America

Study participating centre

2831 Lone Oak Road
Paducah, KY
42003
United States of America

Sponsor information

Institutional Review Board of Ambulatory Surgery Center (USA)
Hospital/treatment centre

2831 Lone Oak Road
Paducah, KY
42003
United States of America

Phone +1 270 775 8373
Email painmgmt@apex.net
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/02swzn148

Funders

Funder type

Not defined

No other external support or funding were received in completion of this study.

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/01/2006 Yes No