A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation using the Synergy™ System in reducing pain in patients with failed back surgery syndrome compared to conventional medical management (PROCESS study)

ISRCTN ISRCTN77527324
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN77527324
Secondary identifying numbers NA
Submission date
12/06/2003
Registration date
04/07/2003
Last edited
23/07/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Krishna Kumar
Scientific

Department of Neurosurgery
Regina General Hospital
1440 - 14th Avenue
Regina, Saskatchewan
S4P 0W5
Canada

Phone +1 306 781 61 16
Email krishna.kumar@rqhealth.ca

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeNot Specified
Scientific title
Study acronymPROCESS
Study objectivesPatients will be randomised to receive either spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or conventional medical management (CMM) for a period of 24 months (1:1 randomisation). Patients receiving SCS will first undergo trial stimulation. In case of less than 80% paraesthesia coverage and/or less than 50% pain relief in the legs following trial stimulation the patients will not undergo the implantation of the Synergy™ stimulator, but will still be followed-up according to the intention to treat principle. At the 6 months visit, a review of the effectiveness of treatment will take place based on leg pain relief. Patients will be classified as successful (i.e. ? 50% pain relief in the legs) or non-successful (i.e. less than 50% pain relief in the legs). Moreover, the treatment of the patient will be reviewed and patients not successful may switch to the other treatment for the remainder of the study duration (18 months) if deemed necessary by the physician and the patient.
The assumption is that the proportion of patients successfully treated will be 42.5% in the SCS arm and 14.5% in the CMM arm.Patients will be randomised to receive either spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or conventional medical management (CMM) for a period of 24 months (1:1 randomisation). Patients receiving SCS will first undergo trial stimulation. In case of less than 80% paraesthesia coverage and/or less than 50% pain relief in the legs following trial stimulation the patients will not undergo the implantation of the Synergy(tm) stimulator, but will still be followed-up according to the intention to treat principle. At the 6 months visit, a review of the effectiveness of treatment will take place based on leg pain relief. Patients will be classified as successful (i.e. >50% pain relief in the legs) or non-successful (i.e. less than 50% pain relief in the legs). Moreover, the treatment of the patient will be reviewed and patients not successful may switch to the other treatment for remainder of the study duration (18 months) if deemed necessary by the physician and the patient.
The assumption is that the proportion of patients successfully treated will be 42.5% in the SCS arm and 14.5% in the CMM arm, with a power of 80% and an alpha <0.05.
The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation using the Synergy(tm) System on leg pain in patients with failed back surgery syndrome of a predominantly neuropathic nature compared to CMM.
The secondary aim of the study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation using the Synergy(tm) System on pain in patients with failed back surgery syndrome of a predominantly neuropathic nature compared to CMM.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedFailed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS), chronic neurophatic pain
InterventionTreatment A:
Spinal cord stimulation using the Synergy™ Neuromodulation System (Medtronic) including trial stimulation. Patients may receive conventional treatment such as pain medication, physical therapy and/or other therapies on the basis of need and at the discretion of the investigator, but not spinal surgery or intrathecal drug delivery systems

Treatment B:
Conventional medical management, to include physical and psychological therapy/rehabilitation and drug treatment, but not spinal surgery or intrathecal drug delivery systems. The particular package of conventional therapy (drug and non-drug), will be determined by the investigator on the basis of the needs of each patient.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measurePercentage of patients reporting >50% pain relief in the legs
Secondary outcome measuresPain relief, health-related quality of life (SF-36 and EQ-5D), functional capacity (Oswestry), patient satisfaction, time away from work, adverse events
Overall study start date09/04/2003
Completion date30/06/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants100
Key inclusion criteria1. Male/female between 18 and 65 years
Protocol Amended 07/10/03 - Patients aged 65 and older are also included
2. Bilateral or unilateral chronic neuropathic pain predominantly in the leg(s)(>50%)
3. Pain radiating in dermatomo segments L4 and/or L5 and/or S1 for at least 6 months following at least one anatomically successful surgery for a herniated disc
4. Pain intensity assessed by visual analogue scales (VAS) >5 (50%)
5. Willing to provide informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. Predominantly back pain (>50%)
2. Presence of any other clinically significant or disabling chronic pain condition
3. Expected inability of patients to receive or properly operate the spinal cord stimulation system
4. History of coagulation disorders, lupus erythematosus, diabetic neuropathy, rheumatoid arthritis or morbus Bechterew
5. Active malignancy
6. Current use of medicines affecting coagulation which cannot be temporarily stopped
7. Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact the perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the investigator
8. Life expectancy of less than 1 year
9. Existing or planned pregnancy
Date of first enrolment09/04/2003
Date of final enrolment30/06/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Canada

Study participating centre

Department of Neurosurgery
Regina, Saskatchewan
S4P 0W5
Canada

Sponsor information

Medtronic Europe sarl
Not defined

Route du Molliau, 31
Tolochenaz
CH-1131
Switzerland

Phone +41-21-802 73 29
Email carine.van.den.abeele@medtronic.com
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00grd1h17

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Medtronic Europe Sàrl (Switzerland)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/11/2007 Yes No
Results article results 01/05/2009 Yes No