A cluster randomised controlled trial of a lunchbox template, designed to improve the content of lunchboxes in primary school children in the UK

ISRCTN ISRCTN77710993
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN77710993
Secondary identifying numbers FSA N14R0004
Submission date
09/05/2007
Registration date
27/09/2007
Last edited
30/10/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Janet Cade
Scientific

Nutritional Epidemiology Group
Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics
University of Leeds
30-32 Hyde Terrace
Leeds
LS2 9LN
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1133 436946
Email j.e.cade@leeds.ac.uk

Study information

Study designCluster randomised controlled trial (randomised by schools)
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeNot Specified
Scientific title
Study objectivesThe use of a ‘smart’ lunchbox approach is more effective in improving healthy food consumption in primary school children at lunchtime, than providing a healthy eating leaflet alone.
Ethics approval(s)University of Leeds. Date of approval:26/10/06 (ref: 1706)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedNutrition
InterventionRandomisation: The schools in England were stratified to tertiles according to the percentage of pupils in the school eligible for free school meals, and quintiles according to the key stage 2 Standard Assessment Tests (SATs) exam results (percentage of pupils reaching level 4 in mathematics, English and science). These are approximate measures of deprivation of the catchments area of the school. Stratification ensured that the intervention and control groups contained equal numbers of schools at different levels of both factors.

Intervention materials were devised according to best practice and the results of an earlier video ethnography study. In that preliminary study, parents were videoed about their choices of food for their children’s lunchboxes. The intervention group in this study received a ‘smart’ lunchbox template and associated materials and activities (the ‘smart’ lunchbox approach) to provide an aid to parents for shopping for lunchbox food and preparation, and encouragement to children to adopt healthier eating patterns. The template itself is a physical resource (a lunchbox), with different compartments containing information and pictures about the choices open to parents. This template has been developed in collaboration with organisations involved in designing, developing and producing new food packaging materials (e.g. Faraday Packaging Partnership and Design Futures). The collaborative approach has ensured that the expertise of relevant parties from academia and industry can be capitalised on throughout the development phase.

The template aimed to support healthier lunchbox preparation in three ways:
1. Support at the point of food shopping
2. Support during lunchbox preparation at home
3. Support for the child at school lunch to encourage eating the healthier lunch

The template was based on the ‘Balance of Good Health’ to guide parents regarding the balance to be aimed at in preparation of a lunchbox. Parents and children also received supporting materials such as magnets, shopping bags, drink bottles, stickers, games, healthy eating information, the School Foods Trust leaflet on packed lunches and ideas for three weeks of packed lunchboxes. In combination this is known as ‘the smart lunchbox approach’.

The control group received the School Foods Trust leaflet.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Nutritional and food based measurements indicating improvements in the contents of lunch boxes
2. Levels of macronutrients:
2.1. Fat
2.2. Sugar
2.3. Energy
2.4. Protein
2.5. Sodium
3. Food types (e.g. sandwiches, savoury snacks, confectionery, dairy)

The outcomes above will be assessed by the following:
1. A questionnaire in June 2006 (baseline) and an identical follow up questionnaire repeated in June 2007
2. All food in the lunch box was weighed before and after lunch to measure the amount of food consumed and left over
Secondary outcome measuresMicronutrients (e.g. iron, zinc, vitamin A) assessed by:
1. Weighing each food item in the lunch box before and after lunch to measure the amount of food consumed and left over, as for primary outcome measures
2. Questionnaire in June 2006 (baseline) and an identical follow up questionnaire repeated in June 2007, as for primary outcome measures
Overall study start date01/06/2006
Completion date30/06/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit8 Years
Upper age limit9 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants600
Key inclusion criteriaAll primary schools in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland were eligible for inclusion in the study, All children in Year 4 (8 to 9 years old) of participating schools who bring in a packed lunch were eligible for inclusion in the study.
Key exclusion criteriaPrimary schools involved in another healthy eating study (the evaluation of the National School Fruit Scheme).
Date of first enrolment01/06/2006
Date of final enrolment30/06/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Nutritional Epidemiology Group
Leeds
LS2 9LN
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Food Standards Agency (UK)
Government

Aviation house
125 Kingsway
London
WC2B 6NH
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7276 8936
Email Tamara.beckett@foodstandards.gsi.gov.uk
Website http://www.food.gov.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05p20a626

Funders

Funder type

Government

Food Standards Agency (UK)
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Alternative name(s)
The Food Standards Agency, FSA
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/11/2010 Yes No