Perfecting Parenting: integrated evaluation of micronutrient deficiencies and parenting practices in rural China

ISRCTN ISRCTN77826378
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN77826378
Secondary identifying numbers PerfectingParenting-QC01, 25734
Submission date
13/02/2023
Registration date
27/02/2023
Last edited
22/02/2023
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Studies have shown that children growing up in poor, rural Chinese regions during the first years of life are at high risk of developmental delays. Given that approximately half of all Chinese infants in China are currently growing up in rural regions, a large share of all Chinese children is at risk of missing out on their full developmental potential. Earlier interventional studies implemented in low- to middle-income countries have convincingly shown that parenting training programs focusing on caregiver-child interaction can effectively reduce the emergence of early cognitive delays. Thus, this study aimed to assess whether a parenting training program done in rural China, combining training on child psychosocial stimulation with information on child nutrition, can adjust problematic parenting skills and practices and improve children’s early child development, health, nutrition, and physical growth outcomes.

Who can participate?
All 18- to 30-month-old children living in the sample villages in rural Shaanxi Province, China, at the start of the study, with their main caregivers.

What does the study involve?
Participating villages are randomly assigned to intervention and control. All 18- to 30-month-olds and their main caregivers living in villages assigned to intervention are selected to participate in a parenting program. Those in the control group received no intervention. Caregivers and children in the intervention group are invited to participate in weekly parenting training sessions delivered at home by a parenting trainer. In these sessions, caregivers are taught how to interact with their children in ways that can improve their cognition, language, motor, and social-emotional development.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
This study is expected to benefit children whose main caregivers participated in the intervention study. Child early development, nutrition, and physical growth status are hypothesized to improve in response to more stimulating home learning environments. It was also hoped that caregivers may apply taught parenting skills and practices to improve the developmental outcomes of other children living in the household and neighborhood. Moreover, this curriculum is designed to be scalable if proven successful. There are no known risks to participants taking part in this study.

Where is the study run from?
131 villages in Shaanxi Province (China)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
April 2014 to April 2015

Who is funding the study?
1. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie) (USA)
2. UBS Optimus Foundation (Switzerland)
3. Bank of East Asia (Hong Kong)
4. China Medical Board (USA)
5. Huaqiao Foundation (China)
6. Noblesse

Who is the main contact?
Mrs Alexis Medina, amedina5@stanford.edu (USA)

Contact information

Prof Scott Rozelle
Principal Investigator

Rural Education Action Program (REAP)
616 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford
94305
United States of America

Phone +1 650 862-0466
Email rozelle@stanford.edu
Mrs Alexis Medina
Public

Rural Education Action Program (REAP)
616 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford
94305
United States of America

Phone +1 650 724 9254
Email amedina5@stanford.edu
Prof Scott Rozelle
Scientific

Rural Education Action Program (REAP)
616 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford
94305
United States of America

Phone +1 650 862 0466
Email rozelle@stanford.edu

Study information

Study designInterventional multi-center single-blind cluster randomized controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designCluster randomised trial
Study setting(s)Home
Study typePrevention
Participant information sheet No participant information sheet available
Scientific titleA cluster-randomized controlled trial to measure the impact of a combined nutrition and parenting intervention on child and parent outcomes in rural China
Study objectivesWe hypothesize that participation in our parenting intervention will lead to significant improvements in parenting practices as well as short- and long-term child cognitive development and nutrition outcomes.
Ethics approval(s)Approved 29/10/2013, Stanford University Human Subjects Research Institutional Review Board (1705 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA; +1 (650) 723-2480; irbnonmed@stanford.edu), ref: 4593
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedEvaluation of parenting attitudes, knowledge, and practice on rural Chinese children's early development, health, nutrition, and physical growth.
InterventionAll communities (villages) in the sample are randomly assigned to intervention and control using a computerized random number generator.

Families assigned to the control group received no intervention.

Families in the intervention group are invited to participate in weekly parenting training sessions delivered at home over a period of six months. During each home visit, trained members from the National Health and Family Planning Commission (NHFPC) introduce two age-appropriate, interactive caregiver-child activities targeting development in four developmental domains: cognition, language, motor, and social-emotional development. Each activity was fully scripted in an early child development curriculum that was loosely based on the "Jamaica curriculum" developed by Sally Grantham-McGregor and further developed by local child development psychologists and early child development experts.

No further follow-up treatment is planned.
Intervention typeBehavioural
Primary outcome measure1. Children's cognitive, language, motor, and social-emotional development are measured using the following methods at baseline and endline:
1.1. Cognition, language, motor, and social-emotional development measured using scales of the first edition of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-I) for younger children, and the Griffith Mental Development Scales (GMDS-ER 2–8) for older children
1.2. Communication, gross motor, fine motor, personal-social, problem-solving, and overall development measured using scales of the third edition of the Ages & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3)
1.3. Ages & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE)
2. Child micronutrient status measured using hemoglobin values in fingerprick blood testing at baseline and endline
3. Child height and weight measured using scales at baseline and endline
Secondary outcome measuresCaregivers’ attitudes, knowledge, and behavior with regard to parenting practices measured using a comprehensive household questionnaire administered to the primary caregiver of the child at baseline
Overall study start date01/10/2013
Completion date01/04/2015

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Other
Age groupMixed
SexBoth
Target number of participants600
Total final enrolment592
Key inclusion criteriaAll babies aged 18 to 30 months at the start of the study (and their main caregivers) who lived in the sample villages.
Key exclusion criteria1. Babies from rich urban areas
2. Babies with severe anemia after initial blood tests (these children will then be referred to a doctor for treatment)
3. Babies outside of the age range (18-30 months)
Date of first enrolment01/04/2014
Date of final enrolment30/04/2014

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • China
  • United States of America

Study participating centre

Rural Education Action Program (REAP)
616 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford
94305
United States of America

Sponsor information

Stanford University
Research organisation

Rural Education Action Program (REAP)
616 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford
94305
United States of America

Phone +1 650 724 9254
Email sccei-info@stanford.edu
Website https://sccei.fsi.stanford.edu/reap
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00f54p054

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)

No information available

UBS Optimus Foundation
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Location
Switzerland
China Medical Board
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Alternative name(s)
CMB
Location
United States of America
Bank of East Asia

No information available

Huaqiao University
Government organisation / Local government
Alternative name(s)
HQU
Location
China
Noblesse

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/05/2017
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact and peer-reviewed journal
IPD sharing planThe dataset generated during and analyzed during the study is available upon request from Dr Dorien Emmers, dorien.emmers@kuleuven.be. De-identified data may be made available to researchers upon request and after careful reviewing of the research aim of the applying researcher. Oral consent was obtained from the interviewees and trial participants before survey administration and treatment enrollment. All datasets will be de-identified by removal of names, household IDs and village IDs.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article cognition 11/05/2017 20/02/2023 Yes No
Results article parenting program outcomes 14/09/2020 20/02/2023 Yes No

Editorial Notes

20/02/2023: Trial's existence confirmed by the Stanford University Human Subjects Research Institutional Review Board (USA).