Stent-protected angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs endarterectomy: two two-arm clinical trials

ISRCTN ISRCTN78592017
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN78592017
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
07/11/2006
Registration date
16/07/2007
Last edited
20/09/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
The aim of this study is to compare up-to-date medical (conservative) treatment (BMT) including lifestyle modification with carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in addition to those conservative treatments in the treatment of individuals with asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid artery stenoses.

Who can participate?
Patients with asymptomatic stenosis of the extracranial carotid artery. Asymptomatic means without stroke or stroke-like symptoms attributable to the target stenosis within the previous 180 days.

What does the study involve?
Patients are allocated to one of the two substudies based on the decision of the including physician and the patient's preference: either CEA (SPACE2a substudy) or CAS (SPACE2b substudy). Patients in the SPACE2a study will be randomly allocated to receive either CEA + BMT or BMT alone, while those in the SPACE2b study will be randomly allocated to receive either CAS + BMT or BMT alone. BMT is defined as the best medical treatment of hypertension, blood glucose and hyperlipidemia according to current guidelines.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The benefit from every treatment is the proposed reduction of future cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. Each treatment arm carries specific risks. Risks from the conservative treatment are mainly due to possible side effects of the medication. The most important risk of both CAS and CEA is the risk of periprocedural stroke.

Where is the study run from?
University hospitals of Heidelberg, Kiel and Munich (technical university).

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
Recruitment of subjects started in October 2009. The overall duration of the trial is expected to be about 9 years.

Who is funding the study?
German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG]), Germany.

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Werner Hacke
Werner.Hacke@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Study website

Contact information

Prof Werner Hacke
Scientific

Department of Neurology
University of Heidelberg
Im Neuenheimer Feld 400
Heidelberg
69120
Germany

Phone +49 (0)6221 568211
Email Werner.Hacke@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled open multi-centre study with two two-arm clinical trials
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Can be found at: http://www.space-2.de/downloads/SPACE-2%20Patienteninformation.pdf (German only)
Scientific titleStent-protected angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs endarterectomy: a randomised, controlled, open, multi-centre study
Study acronymSPACE-2
Study hypothesisCurrent hypothesis as of 19/12/2013:
Two separate superiority trials of interventions versus best medical treatment (BMT) are designed. The decision for one type of intervention is made (carotid endarterectomy [CEA] = SPACE2a or carotid artery stenting [CAS] = SPACE2b) prior to randomization. In both studies (SPACE2a and SPACE2b) the interventional treatment groups (CEA and CAS) will be compared with best medical treatment (BMT) separately. In addition, data from the CEA and CAS groups will be compared in an explorative manner.

Protocol can be found at: http://www.space-2.de/de/service/03/

Previous hypothesis:
1. Superiority of stent-protected angioplasty or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as compared to best medical treatment with respect to the composite primary endpoint
2. Stent-protected angioplasty is not inferior to carotid endarterectomy with respect to the composite primary endpoint
Ethics approval(s)1. Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg, 20/10/2008, ref: S-311/2008
2. Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg gave approval on change of study design (amendment 25.09.2012) on 04/04/2013
ConditionAsymptomatic moderate to severe stenosis of the extracranial carotid artery
InterventionCurrent interventions as of 19/12/2013:
Patients are allocated to one of the two substudies based on the decision of the including physician and the patient's preference: either CEA (SPACE2a substudy) or CAS (SPACE2b substudy). Patients in the SPACE2a study will be randomly allocated to receive either CEA + BMT or BMT alone, while those in the SPACE2b study will be randomly allocated to receive either CAS + BMT or BMT alone. BMT is defined as optimal medical treatment of hypertension, blood glucose and hyperlipidemia according to current guidelines.

Previous interventions:
1. BMT alone
2. Stent-protected angioplasty and BMT
3. Carotid endarterectomy and BMT
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureCumulative rate of events consisting of:
1. Any stroke within 30 days of treatment
2. Death from any cause within 30 days
3. Ipsilateral ischaemic stroke within five years
Secondary outcome measures1. All single components of the primary endpoint clusters
2. Any stroke, vascular death or myocardial infarction within 30 days (five years)
3. Any ischaemic stroke within 30 days (five years)
4. Disabling stroke within 30 days (five years)
5. Technical failure of intervention
6. Rate of re-stenosis (NASCET more than or equal to 50%)
7. Rate of myocardial infarction (30 days)
Overall study start date01/03/2009
Overall study end date12/12/2019

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit85 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants2 x 1636
Total final enrolment513
Participant inclusion criteriaSonographic identification of a more than or equal to 50% stenosis (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial [NASCET] criteria) of the extracranial carotid artery in a patient (both genders, age limit 85 years) without symptoms attributable to the target stenosis within the previous 180 days.
Participant exclusion criteriaNon-atherosclerotic origin of carotid stenosis.
Recruitment start date09/07/2009
Recruitment end date12/12/2014

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Austria
  • Germany
  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

University of Heidelberg
Heidelberg
69120
Germany

Sponsor information

German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG]) (Germany)
Research council

Kennedyallee 40
Bonn
53175
Germany

Phone +49 (0)228 885 1
Email postmaster@dfg.de
Website http://www.dfg.de
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/018mejw64

Funders

Funder type

Research council

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
German Research Association, German Research Foundation, DFG
Location
Germany

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 01/08/2009 Yes No
Results article results 01/06/2016 Yes No
Results article results 15/03/2019 04/08/2020 Yes No
Results article 01/10/2022 20/09/2022 Yes No

Editorial Notes

20/09/2022: Publication reference added.
26/08/2022: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment start date was changed from 01/10/2009 to 09/07/2009.
2. The recruitment end date was changed from 01/07/2020 to 12/12/2014.
3. The overall end date was changed from 01/07/2020 to 12/12/2019.
4. The plain English summary was updated to reflect these changes.
04/08/2020: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The total final enrolment was added.
18/04/2016: Publication reference added.

On 07/01/2014 the overall trial end date was changed from 01/07/2015 to 01/07/2020.

On 19/12/2013 the following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The public title was changed from 'Stent-protected angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: SPACE-2' to 'Stent-protected angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs endarterectomy: two two-arm clinical trials'
2. The scientific title was changed from 'Stent-protected angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a randomised, controlled, open, multi-centre study' to 'Stent-protected angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs endarterectomy: a randomised, controlled, open, multi-centre study'
3. The study design was changed from 'Randomised controlled open multi-centre study with three parallel groups' to 'Randomised controlled open multi-centre study with two two-arm clinical trials'
4. The target number of participants was changed from '3523' to '2 x 1636'

On 11/02/2009 this record was updated to include an amended overall trial start date. The initial date at the time of registration was 01/07/2007.