Comparison of effects of LigaSure™ with those of Monopolar Electrocautery on wound healing in early post-operative period after pilonidal sinus surgery

ISRCTN ISRCTN81456610
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN81456610
Protocol serial number Project no.: 10-03-16-40
Sponsor Başkent University (Turkey)
Funder Investigator initiated and funded (Turkey)
Submission date
24/10/2010
Registration date
08/11/2010
Last edited
26/10/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Alper Parlakgumus
Scientific

Adana Teaching and Research Center
General Surgery Department
Adana
01250
Türkiye

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designProspective randomised controlled clinical trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleComparison of effects of LigaSure™ with those of Monopolar Electrocautery on wound healing in early post-operative period after pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial
Study acronymLSME
Study objectivesTo investigate effects of LigaSure™ with monopolar electrocautery on wound healing in the early post-operative period after pilonidal sinus surgery.
Ethics approval(s)Eskiºehir Osmangazi University Research Council and Local Ethics Committee approved on the 21st May 2010 (ref: 10-03-16-40)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSacrococcygeal pilonidal disease
InterventionFollowing an incision in the skin, pilonidal sinus excision was performed with monopolar electrocautery in the control group (n = 64) (Group ME) and with LigaSure™ in the study group (n = 64) (Group LS). Demographic variables, history, physical examination findings, defect dimensions and scores for Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and patient satisfaction were recorded.

After collecting the adequate number of subjects at least 3 months of follow-up and for recovery till the wound healing. Nearly 1 year total duration of treatment.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

1. Surgical site infections, assessed based on the hospital infection control practices advisory committee guidelines
2. Early wound failure (dehiscence), considered as breakdown and dehiscence of the sutured wound with or without infection
3. Recurrence

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. Post-operative use of antibiotics
2. Time to remove sutures
3. Time to wound healing (days), refers to full epithelisation over the wound. When the wound was not healed in the month after surgery, the follow-up of the wound was continued until the wound healed completely.
4. Time to return to all daily activities
5. Time to complete recovery, defined as return to all activities and as complete healing of the wound
6. Patient satisfaction
7. Pain

Completion date30/08/2010

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration128
Key inclusion criteria1. Consecutive patients aged greater than 18 years, either sex
2. Pilonidal disease
3. Considered appropriate for primary closure
4. Giving informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. Declining to participate in the study
2. Having prior surgery for the disease
3. Found to have abscess and infection
Date of first enrolment01/12/2009
Date of final enrolment30/08/2010

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Türkiye

Study participating centre

Adana Teaching and Research Center
Adana
01250
Türkiye

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/09/2011 Yes No
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes