Developing stroke care for adults in the community: rehabilitation through conductive education
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN84064492 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN84064492 |
| Protocol serial number | N/A |
| Sponsor | Birmingham City Council (UK) - Adults and Communities |
| Funder | Birmingham City Council (UK) - Department of Health Stroke Care Grant (May 2009) |
- Submission date
- 12/05/2010
- Registration date
- 04/03/2011
- Last edited
- 09/11/2017
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Circulatory System
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Scientific
National Institute of Conductive Education
Cannon Hill House
Russell Road
Birmingham
B13 8RD
United Kingdom
| melanie@conductive-education.org.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Single-centre interventional randomised waiting list controlled cross-over trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised cross over trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Conductive education as a method of post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial |
| Study objectives | Conductive Education (CE) is a specialised rehabilitation system developed in Hungary in the late 1940s by András Petö. The CE approach is used with adults and children with motor disorders subsequent to neurological damage. CE aims to help stroke survivors to maintain and/or increase range and control of movement, teaching components of everyday skills and strategies that each individual can apply to their daily activities. Functional tasks are broken down into a series of components that are repeatedly and rhythmically practiced with verbal reinforcement ('rhythmical intention'). Task series are designed to allow participants to develop an increased awareness of their own movement and to learn the basic rules of movement solutions which can then be applied through regular daily activity. Previous research has shown some improvements in stroke survivor's activities of daily living and well-being (Brittle et al., 2008), as well as a reduction in carer burden (Laver & Brown, 1995) following CE intervention. However, no previous study has examined CE outcomes for stroke participants in comparison with a control group. We are therefore examining a broad range of quality of life outcomes across physical, cognitive and psychological domains using a randomised design. We are also measuring carer well-being in relation to CE. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Birmingham City Council Research Governance Advisory Committee, 02/02/2010 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Stroke rehabilitation |
| Intervention | The conductive education intervention will be administered as a 1.5 hour session once per week for 10 weeks. Intervention takes place in a small group setting (maximum of 5 participants) led by two conductors. Control (waiting list) participants will attend two introductory sessions during the wait period in which they will receive standard written and visual materials. All participants will be followed up 3 months after completion of the conductive education programme. Participants in the waiting list group will be offered intervention after 3 months. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
1. Mobility will be assessed using a timed up and go test and a 10 metre walking test: |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Cognitive performance will be measured using the following: |
| Completion date | 31/07/2012 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 120 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Individuals who have suffered a stroke and are in the post-acute stage of recovery 2. Participants should be medically well enough to follow the programme and be capable of giving informed consent. 3. Male or female, age ≥ 18 years |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Individuals who are medically unfit to participate or unable to give informed consent 2. Participants must not be receiving regular physiotherapy input |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/04/2010 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/07/2012 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
B13 8RD
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 01/02/2016 | Yes | No | |
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
Editorial Notes
09/11/2017: Publication reference added.