The evaluation of rapid methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening

ISRCTN ISRCTN84432505
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN84432505
Secondary identifying numbers M0005186425
Submission date
24/04/2008
Registration date
30/07/2008
Last edited
22/03/2010
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Peter Hawkey
Scientific

West Midlands Public Health Laboratory
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
Bordesley Green East
Birmingham
B9 5SS
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designA prospective, cluster, two period cross-over design
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeScreening
Scientific titleA study of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening and monitoring on surgical wards using a new, rapid molecular test
Study acronymEMMS
Study hypothesisEarly identification of patients colonised with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) using rapid methods alone reduces transmission.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from the East Birmingham Ethics Committee on the 17th August 2005 (ref: 05/Q2703/62).
ConditionMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonisation and infection
InterventionThis is a prospective, cluster two-period cross-over design, with the only difference between the two periods being the method of MRSA detection. The study compares the use of rapid MRSA testing with the BD GeneOhm™ molecular test (BD Diagnostics - GeneOhm, CA, USA) with a standard direct inoculation culture method using chromogenic media (Biomerieux, Marcy, l’Etoile, France). Wards were assigned to one of two groups, with similar wards being placed in opposite groups. The study consists of two eight-month cross-over periods, with one month follow up of study patients at the end of the final period. For the first eight month period four wards use rapid testing and standard culture methods and three wards use only standard culture methods, this is then reversed for the second eight month period. All patients are screened on admission to the ward and then every four days using a nasal swab. There was no patient follow up on discharge from the study wards.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. MRSA transmission rates
2. MRSA infection rates
3. Antibiotic prescribing levels
4. MRSA related morbidity
5. Test replicability, reliability, sensitivity/specificity, predictive positive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), laboratory turn-around time
Secondary outcome measures1. Cost of hospital episode for all patients
2. Post-discharge primary/community care costs and any subsequent admissions for MRSA positives
3. Length of stay/intensive care unit (ITU) episodes for all patients
4. Recovery/rehabilitation period for MRSA positives
Overall study start date01/10/2005
Overall study end date01/07/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants12,000
Participant inclusion criteria1. Patients greater than 18 years of age, either sex
2. Admitted to seven surgical wards at Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
Participant exclusion criteriaPatients less than 18 years of age
Recruitment start date01/10/2005
Recruitment end date01/07/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

West Midlands Public Health Laboratory
Birmingham
B9 5SS
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Department of Health (UK)
Government

Skipton House
80 London Road
London
SE1 6LH
United Kingdom

Website http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/index.htm
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03sbpja79

Funders

Funder type

Government

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK) - Policy Research Program (PRP) (ref: 0190014)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 03/10/2007 Yes No
Results article results 01/04/2010 Yes No