Improving Management of Patients with Acute Cough by C-reactive protein point of care testing and Communication Training

ISRCTN ISRCTN85154857
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN85154857
Protocol serial number NTR51
Sponsor University Maastricht (Netherlands)
Funder The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (Netherlands)
Submission date
04/08/2005
Registration date
04/08/2005
Last edited
30/05/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof G J Dinant
Scientific

P.O. Box 616
Maastricht
6200 MD
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)43 388 2396
Email geertjan.dinant@hag.unimaas.nl

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised active-controlled factorial trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific titlePoint of care C-reactive protein test and enhanced communication skills for managing acute cough due to lower respiratory tract infection in general practice - cost-effectiveness and effect on diagnostic testing, antibiotic prescribing and recovery: a randomised controlled trial
Study acronymIMPAC3T
Study objectives1. To what extent will the introduction of the C-reactive protein (CRP) point of care test and enhanced communication skills for managing lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in general practice, either separately or combined, lead to an enhancement of patient recovery, a reduction in other diagnostic testing, use of other medical services and a reduction in antibiotic prescribing?
2. To what extent are these reductions cost-effective?
Ethics approval(s)Received from the local ethics committee
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedAcute cough, respiratory tract infection
InterventionRandomisation at the level of practice. Factorial randomisation into four groups:
1. Access to and training in Point of Care (PoC) CRP plus communication training
2. Access to and training in PoC CRP alone
3. Communication training alone
4. Usual care

Point of Care CRP:
Access to and training in use of automatic CRP test device. Sample is one drop of whole blood from a finger prick.

Communication training:
Shared decision making using Simulated Patient in Clinical Encounter (SPICE) method.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

1. Change (decrease) in antibiotic prescription
2. Clinical recovery and return to normal work and activities

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. Cost-effectiveness of PoC CRP and communication training
2. Use of medical services, including re-consultation
3. Change (decrease) in diagnostic testing other than PoC CRP

Completion date01/08/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexAll
Target sample size at registration400
Key inclusion criteria1. First consultation of current episode of acute cough (duration less than four weeks)
2. Regarded by the General Practitioner (GP) to be caused by an acute lower respiratory tract infection
3. At least one out of following four:
3.1. Shortness of breath
3.2. Wheezing
3.3. Chest pain
3.4. Auscultation abnormalities
4. At least one of the following five:
4.1. Fever
4.2. Perspiring
4.3. Headache
4.4. Myalgia
4.5. Feeling generally unwell
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients who require immediate admission to hospital
2. Patients who have no understanding of written and/or spoken Dutch language
3. Patients who previously participated in the study
4. Patients who currently use antibiotic or have taken an antibiotic in the past two weeks
5. Patients who have been hospitalised in the past six weeks
Date of first enrolment01/11/2005
Date of final enrolment01/08/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

P.O. Box 616
Maastricht
6200 MD
Netherlands

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 05/05/2009 Yes No
Results article results 01/03/2013 Yes No
Protocol article protocol 29/03/2007 Yes No