A multi-centre randomised controlled trial assessing the costs and benefits of using structured information and analysis of women's preferences in the management of menorrhagia

ISRCTN ISRCTN85619876
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN85619876
Protocol serial number HTA 93/18/12
Sponsor Department of Health (UK)
Funder NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK)
Submission date
25/04/2003
Registration date
25/04/2003
Last edited
08/11/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr Andrew Kennedy
Scientific

Council on Health Research for Development
11 Rue de Cornavin
Geneva
CH-1201
Switzerland

Phone +41 591 8900
Email kennedy@cohred.org

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific titleA multi-centre randomised controlled trial assessing the costs and benefits of using structured information and analysis of women's preferences in the management of menorrhagia
Study objectivesEach of the medical and surgical therapies available for the treatment of menorrhagia has different outcomes, risks and benefits. Women are likely to have different attitudes towards the trade-offs that present themselves when choosing a treatment. It is important, therefore, that women's preferences are taken into account when treatment decisions are being made. However, in order to share in decision making, women need structured and full information on menorrhagia and its treatment.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedUrological and genital diseases: Menstrual disorders
InterventionRandomised controlled trial. This study is made up of two phases. Phase I will involve developing structured information on menorrhagia in the form of a booklet and a video, together with an interview protocol to be used to assess women's preferences regarding the treatment of the condition. In Phase II, 600 women with menorrhagia referred to one of five hospitals will be randomised to standard management or to a new management strategy involving the provision of structured information and the assessment of preferences using the package developed in Phase I. Women will be followed-up over 2 years to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the new management strategy. The extensive data collected in Phase II of the study will facilitate secondary analyses that will provide information to improve the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the management of menorrhagia.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

Women will be followed-up over 2 years to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the new management strategy. The primary outcome was health status, measured using the 36-item short-form general health survey (SF-36) instrument.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Secondary outcomes included women's treatment preferences, treatments undergone and satisfaction. In the economic analyses, health outcomes were measured in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) based on women's responses to the EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 dimensions) instrument.

Completion date31/08/2000

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target sample size at registration200
Key inclusion criteriaWomen with menorrhagia
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration.
Date of first enrolment01/10/1995
Date of final enrolment31/08/2000

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

Council on Health Research for Development
Geneva
CH-1201
Switzerland

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article HTA monograph 01/12/2003 Yes No

Editorial Notes

08/11/2022: Internal review.