Alternative Intra Osseous Devices: randomised controlled trial comparing three intraosseous methods

ISRCTN ISRCTN85744812
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN85744812
Protocol serial number N/A
Sponsor Erasmus Medical Center (The Netherlands)
Funder Medirisk (The Netherlands)
Submission date
28/12/2006
Registration date
28/12/2006
Last edited
07/03/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr I B Schipper
Scientific

Erasmus Medical Center
Trauma Center ZWN
Room Z-9.15
P.O. Box 2040
Rotterdam
3000 CA
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)10 463 5034
Email i.schipper@erasmusmc.nl

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised, controlled, parallel group, single blinded study
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study acronymAIOD
Study objectivesThe aim of this study is to analyse whether or not it is possible to created a fast, reliable intraosseous entrance using the BIG and/or FAST bone needles, with less complications compared with the traditional bone needle Jamshidi.
Ethics approval(s)Approval received from the Medical Ethical review board, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The approval was completed at 15th June 2006 with reference number MEC-2006-109.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSevere injury, life threatening
InterventionThe intervention consists of the application of a randomised instraosseous needle:
1. In people over 14 years: BIG versus FAST versus conventional bone needle
2. In children more than one and less than 14 years: BIG versus conventional bone needle
Intervention typeDevice
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)
Primary outcome measure(s)

1. Primary endpoint: aspiration of bone marrow upon successful placement of a bone needle.
2. Primary parameter is time required for successful placement.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Secondary endpoint: Complications encoured using an intraosseous device
Secondary parameters:
1. Adverse events
2. Success rate (%)
3. User friendliness (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])
4. Pain scored by the patient (VAS)

Completion date20/06/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupOther
SexNot Specified
Target sample size at registration150
Key inclusion criteria1. Patients in acute life threatening situations, requiring assistance of a mobile medical team
2. Intravascular medical or fluid resuscitation is necessary and intravascular access cannot be obtained after two attempts
Key exclusion criteria1. Children under the age of one year
2. Patients with suspected sternumanomaly (only FAST1)
Date of first enrolment21/06/2006
Date of final enrolment20/06/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam
3000 CA
Netherlands

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan