A randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and patient and carer satisfaction associated with different levels of intensity of community rehabilitation
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN87368849 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN87368849 |
| Protocol serial number | RBG 99XX7 |
| Sponsor | NHS R&D Regional Programme Register - Department of Health (UK) |
| Funder | NHS Executive Trent (UK) |
- Submission date
- 23/01/2004
- Registration date
- 23/01/2004
- Last edited
- 28/10/2016
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Prof Pam Enderby
Scientific
Scientific
Centre for Ageing and Rehabilitation Studies
Community Sciences Centre
Northern General Hospital NHS Trust
Herries Road
Sheffield
S5 7AU
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)114 271 5916 |
|---|---|
| p.m.enderby@sheffield.ac.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Scientific title | A randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and patient and carer satisfaction associated with different levels of intensity of community rehabilitation |
| Study objectives | Evaluate and compare the levels of impairment, disability, handicap and well-being among elderly patients receiving either a supplemented CRT service or non-intensive CRT service following stroke or fractured neck of femur. Evaluate and compare the costs, both direct and indirect, of providing intensive community rehabilitation and non-intensive community rehabilitation for elderly patients following stroke or fractured neck of femur. Evaluate and compare levels of patient and informal carer satisfaction with intensive community rehabilitation and non-intensive community rehabilitation. Estimate the cost effectiveness of intensive community rehabilitation intervention versus non-intensive community rehabilitation for elderly patients following stroke or fractured neck of femur. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Stroke or fractured neck of femur |
| Intervention | i. Intensive community rehabilitation service ii. Standard care |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Death at 3 and 12 months. Institutionalisation at 3 and 12 months. Length of stay. Re-admission rates. Use of GP services. Use of other health services. Use of social services. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Not provided at time of registration |
| Completion date | 31/12/2002 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Not Specified |
| Sex | Not Specified |
| Key inclusion criteria | Patients aged 65 plus, admitted from their own home to either the Central Sheffield University Hospital or Northern General Hospital following a 'first' stroke or fractured neck of femur. |
| Key exclusion criteria | Not provided at time of registration |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/01/2000 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/12/2002 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
Centre for Ageing and Rehabilitation Studies
Sheffield
S5 7AU
United Kingdom
S5 7AU
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Editorial Notes
28/10/2016: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator
