Randomised clinical trial of longitudinal versus torsional mode ultrasound in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

ISRCTN ISRCTN87527062
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN87527062
Protocol serial number N0436121394
Sponsor Department of Health (UK)
Funder Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Submission date
12/09/2003
Registration date
12/09/2003
Last edited
02/07/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr SS Ching
Scientific

D Floor, Clarendon Wing
Leeds General Infirmary
Great George Street
Leeds
LS1 3EX
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)113 3922247
Email ching_ss@hotmail.com

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesTo compare torsional mode ultrasound with longitudinal mode ultrasound with regard to safety and efficiency in haemostatic cutting in laparoscopic surgery.

Please note that this record has been updated as of 29/04/2008. All updates can be found in the relevant field, under the above date. Please also note that the anticipated end date of this trial has been updated to 14/11/2007. The previous anticipated end date was 01/09/2004.
Ethics approval(s)Added as of 29/04/2008:
Ethics approval received from the Leeds (West) Research Ethics Committee (ref: 03/009 and 04/Q1205/143).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSurgery: Laparoscopy
InterventionRandomised controlled trial. Random allocation to:
A. Longitudinal Mode Ultrasound
B. Torsional Mode Ultrasound
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure(s)

Current primary outcomes as of 29/04/2008:
Operative blood loss, calculated within 24 hours post surgery.

Previous primary outcomes:
Operating time, blood loss, post operative complications.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Added as of 29/04/2008:
1. Gallbladder dissection time, measured during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
2. Gallbladder perforation rate, measured during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
3. Need for monopolar electrocoagulation, measured during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
4. Complications, recorded post-operatively

Completion date14/11/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexAll
Target sample size at registration160
Key inclusion criteriaPatients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Key exclusion criteriaAdded as of 29/04/2008:
1. Oral anticoagulant treatment
2. Known coagulation disorder
3. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 or more
4. Aged less than 16 years
5. Pregnancy
6. Mental illness
7. The need to explore the common bile duct at the time of surgery
Date of first enrolment01/01/2003
Date of final enrolment14/11/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

D Floor, Clarendon Wing
Leeds
LS1 3EX
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/07/2009 Yes No