The role of autonomic responses to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in predicting surgical outcome in non-cardiac surgical patients

ISRCTN ISRCTN88456378
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN88456378
Secondary identifying numbers 13695
Submission date
19/02/2014
Registration date
22/08/2014
Last edited
04/03/2020
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
An important minority of patients develop complications after surgery. These complications can include infections, heart attacks, heart damage and damage to other organs, such as the kidney or brain. It is thought that it may be possible to predict which patients will go on to develop these complications before they undergo surgery. Such knowledge would allow doctors to take steps to reduce the medical risks of surgery. It would also aid the development of future trials of different treatments aimed at reducing said risks. While we are aware of some of the reasons why complications are more likely to happen in some people after surgery, there are a number of potential factors that may increase the risk that are, as yet, not fully understood. Here, we are looking at how the brain controls the heart and immune system after surgery. In healthy people, the brain carefully controls how parts of the nervous system help control inflammation and heart function. After surgery, this control system can change and may contribute to the body not being able to heal or recover as well or as quickly as expected. By measuring nervous system and heart function, we will identify patterns that are linked to patients developing complications that cause problems with their recovery after surgery.

Who can participate?
All adult patients aged 18-95 referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (an exercise test that examines how the lungs, heart and muscles work) before undergoing major non-cardiac (i.e. not involving the heart) surgery

What does the study involve?
As part of the medical assessment process before major surgery, some patients have a cardiopulmonary exercise test. The aim of this test is to see how physically fit the patient is as well as other medical information. This can help doctors develop a treatment plan tailored to the needs of the patient. Each patient is asked to give a blood sample for analysis and their heart rate (ECG) measured before, during and after the exercise test. All patients are monitored throughout their hospital stay. Data about how they recover after surgery and their medical condition is recorded on days 3, 5, 7 and 14 after surgery. This study is observational, meaning that there are no changes to the medical or surgical treatment of patients involved.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no disadvantages/risks of taking part. The information we receive from this study may help us to treat patients who are having surgery in the future.

Where is the study run from?
University College London (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
March 2013 to March 2015

Who is funding the study?
Academy of Medical Sciences (UK)
Centre for Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Gareth Ackland
(See contact details below)

Contact information

Dr Gareth Ackland
Scientific

Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research
Gower Street
London
WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designNon-randomised; Observational; Design type: Cohort study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCohort study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Scientific titleThe role of autonomic responses to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in predicting surgical outcome in non-cardiac surgical patients: an observational cohort study
Study acronymPOM-HR
Study objectivesPatients with abnormal heart rate recovery have a prolonged length of stay postoperatively and greater postoperative morbidity.
Ethics approval(s)12/LO/0453
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTopic: Generic Health Relevance and Cross Cutting Themes; Subtopic: Generic Health Relevance (all Subtopics); Disease: Surgery, Anaesthetics
InterventionNo interventions, Observational; Follow Up Length: 0 month(s)
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measurePost-operative morbidity survey; Timepoint(s): Preop, postop days 3, 7, 14
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration
Overall study start date01/03/2013
Completion date01/03/2015

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit95 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 778; UK Sample Size: 778; Description: Elective non-cardiac surgical patients
Key inclusion criteria1. All surgical patients referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing preoperatively undergoing major non-cardiac surgery
2. Aged 18-95 years
Key exclusion criteria1. History of exercise-induced angioedema
2. Pregnancy
3. Any contraindication to cardiopulmonary exercise testing (as outlined by American Association of Anaesthesia)
Date of first enrolment01/03/2013
Date of final enrolment01/03/2015

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research
London
WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & University College London (UK)
University/education

Gower Street
London
WC1E 6BT
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/042fqyp44

Funders

Funder type

University/education

Academy of Medical Sciences (UK)
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Alternative name(s)
The Academy of Medical Sciences
Location
United Kingdom
Centre for Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/07/2017 22/01/2019 Yes No
Results article results 01/01/2018 22/01/2019 Yes No
Other publications secondary analysis 21/08/2019 04/03/2020 Yes No

Editorial Notes

04/03/2020: Publication reference added.
22/01/2019: Publication references added.
11/05/2017: No publications found in PubMed, verifying study status with principal investigator.