A randomised controlled trial of warfarin vs aspirin for atrial fibrillation in an elderly (aged 75 and over) primary care population: Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged study

ISRCTN ISRCTN89345269
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN89345269
Protocol serial number G9900264
Sponsor University of Birmingham (UK)
Funder Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK)
Submission date
23/10/2000
Registration date
23/10/2000
Last edited
27/03/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Jonathan Mant
Scientific

Department of Primary Care & General Practice
University of Birmingham
The Medical School
Vincent Drive
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Email abc@email.com

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleA randomised controlled trial of warfarin vs aspirin for atrial fibrillation in an elderly (aged 75 and over) primary care population: Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged study
Study acronymBAFTA
Study objectivesTo address the question is warfarin better than aspirin in the treatment of patients aged 75 or over identified in general practice with atrial fibrillation? Specifically to test whether:
1. Adjusted dose warfarin (target INR 2.5) will lead to a significantly lower incidence of fatal or disabling stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) or systemic embolus as compared to aspirin (75mg/day)?
2. There will be no significant difference in the incidence of major non-intracranial haemorrhage (a bleeding event requiring hospital admission or causing death) in the two groups?
3. There will be no significant difference in the death rate (all cause) or hospitalisation rate (all cause) in the two groups?
4. A secondary null hypothesis to be tested is that for the patients randomised to warfarin:
there will be no difference in the proportion of time spent within the target INR range between patients managed in general practice using near patient testing and computerised decision support software and patients managed by a traditional hospital anticoagulation clinic.
Ethics approval(s)NRES Committee North West - Lancaster, 21/03/2013, REC ref: 13/NW/0233
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedAtrial fibrillation in primary care
InterventionPatients will be randomised to:
1. Aspirin 75 mg daily
2. Warfarin, target international normalized ratio (INR) 2.5

Follow-up:
1. Review of GP records at six monthly intervals
2. Annual patient questionnaires
3. Flagging at NHS Central Register
4. Six monthly Review by GP
Intervention typeDrug
PhasePhase IV
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Warfarin, aspirin
Primary outcome measure(s)Fatal or non-fatal disabling stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) or significant systemic embolism
Key secondary outcome measure(s)1. Hospitalisation or death as a result of non-intracranial haemorrhage
2. Death (all cause)
3. Admission to hospital (all cause)
4. Quality of life (SF-12 & Euroqol 5D)
5. Disability (Rankin score)
Completion date01/06/2019

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupSenior
SexAll
Target sample size at registration973
Key inclusion criteria1. Age 75 or over
2. Non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation confirmed by electrocardiogram (ECG)
Key exclusion criteria1. Already on warfarin
2. History of major haemorrhage
3. Recent peptic ulcer disease (previous year)
4. Sensitivity to any of the study medications
5. Rheumatic heart disease
Date of first enrolment01/10/1999
Date of final enrolment31/12/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

University of Birmingham
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryData sharing statement to be made available at a later date
IPD sharing planThe data sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article main results 11/08/2007 Yes No
Results article results 01/05/2014 Yes No
Protocol article protocol 26/08/2003 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No
Other publications secondary analysis 25/04/2007 Yes No
Other publications recruitment analysis 01/12/2010 Yes No
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes

Editorial Notes

27/03/2018: Ethics approval information, publication and dissemination plan and IPD sharing statement added.
23/03/2018: The overall trial end date was changed from 31/12/2006 to 01/06/2019.