A pilot study of a trial of tight control of blood pressure during hip fracture surgery in older people

ISRCTN ISRCTN89812075
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN89812075
Secondary identifying numbers 30629
Submission date
30/08/2016
Registration date
30/08/2016
Last edited
14/01/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Around 70,000 mainly elderly people will have a hip fracture every year in the UK. It has a significant impact on the individual, families, carers and the health service. Recent studies have shown that there is a link between low blood pressure during surgery and worse outcomes afterwards. It is currently not known whether the low blood pressure is the cause of the problems or simply a sign of patients who become unwell following surgery. The study team hopes to undertake a large trial of tight control of blood pressure to see whether it makes a difference to major complications after surgery such as heart attack, stroke, confusion and kidney injury. Before this however, it is important to undertake a small study to find out if a large trial would be feasible. The aim of this study is to find out whether it is feasible to conduct a study looking at whether controlling blood pressure within tight limits during hip fracture surgery lead to fewer major complications (heart, brain and kidney individually) in the first week after surgery.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 70 and over who have a broken hip that requires surgery.

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups. Both groups of patients receive standard surgical care, anaesthesia (being put to sleep for surgery) and after-surgery care. Those in the first group receive drugs and intravenous (through a drip) fluids to keep their blood pressure within quite tight limits during their surgery. Those in the second group receive standard care (which involves receiving drugs and fluids according to the clinical opinion of the doctors looking after them in surgery). Over the following seven days, participants in both groups receive daily blood tests to find out if they are showing signs of heart or kidney damage and are assessed for signs of confusion (brain damage). One month later, participants receive a follow up phone call to check on health status and where they are living. Survival is also followed up at these times and then one year later through reviewing medical records.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no direct benefits or risks involved with participating in this study.

Where is the study run from?
Queen’s Medical Centre (lead centre), Royal Sussex County Hospital and Peterborough City Hospital (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2015 to February 2019

Who is funding the study?
National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Iain Moppett
iain.moppett@nottingham.ac.uk

Contact information

Dr Iain Moppett
Scientific

Anaesthesia and Critical Care
Division of Clinical Neuroscience
Queen’s Medical Centre
University of Nottingham
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-3750-6067
Phone +44 (0)115 823 0959
Email iain.moppett@nottingham.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised; Interventional; Design type: Treatment, Drug, Complex Intervention, Surgery
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleHip fracture intervention study for prevention of hypotension (HIP-HOP) trial: pilot study
Study acronymHIP-HOP
Study hypothesisThe aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of recruiting participants to a study looking at whether reducing the amount of hypotension (number, severity and duration of episodes) during anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery decreases the frequency of delirium, heart abnormalities and kidney failure within five days after the operation.
Ethics approval(s)East Midlands - Nottingham 1 Research Ethics Committee, 13/04/2016, ref: 16/EM/0036
ConditionSpecialty: Injuries and emergencies, Primary sub-specialty: Injuries and emergencies; UKCRC code/ Disease: Injuries and Accidents/ Injuries to the hip and thigh
InterventionParticipants are randomised to one of two groups in blocks of unequal size, stratified by intended mode of anaesthesia and Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (≤4 vs >4).

Participants in both groups will undergo hip fracture surgery and rehabilitation in accordance with national and local standards of care.

Intervention group: Participants will receive active treatment as required to maintain both of the following:
1. SAP > 80% of baseline preoperative value
2. MAP > 75 mm Hg throughout
The order and doses of treatments to achieve this will depend upon the clinical scenario but will include:
1. Fluid bolus to ensure adequate intravascular volume (associated with reduced requirement for vasoactive drugs11)
2. Combined beta / alpha-1 adrenergic agonist (ephedrine)
3. More selective alpha-1 adrenergic agonist (metaraminol)
Blood pressure will be measured using standard non-invasive equipment every 2.5 minutes, or continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (Nexfin, CNAP) throughout.

Control group: Participants receive standard blood pressure control, which involves the administration of fluids and vasopressor drugs deemed clinically appropriate by the attending anaesthetist during surgery. Frequency of blood pressure monitoring will be at the attending anaesthetist’s discretion, but at least every 5 minutes.

Study participants will be participating in the study for seven days whilst in hospital with a telephone follow-up at 30 days. Mortality at one year will be retrieved from central records.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureComposite of presence or absence of defined cardiovascular, renal and delirium morbidity is measured daily for 7 days post-surgery using blood testing, clinical observations, and medical record review.
Secondary outcome measuresClinical outcomes:
1. Presence or absence of each of defined cardiovascular, renal and delirium morbidity is measured daily for 7 days post-surgery using blood testing, clinical observations, and medical record review
2. Prevalence bone cement implantation syndrome will be measured using the Donaldson grading tool recorded during anaesthesia and surgery
3. Postoperative mortality is measured 5 and 30 days, and 1 year through medical record review
4. Quality of life is measured using the EQ-5D questionnaire 30 days post-surgery

Feasibility outcomes:
1. Recruitment rate is recorded as the number of eligible participant who consent to participate in the study by 12 months
2. Protocol efficacy will be measured by recording arterial blood pressure intraoperatively and determining
2.1. The lowest arterial blood pressure (systolic, mean and diastolic) value following induction of anaesthesia; and
2.2. Time below threshold values (Mean arterial pressure 75mmHg, 80% pre-op mean arterial pressure)
Overall study start date19/01/2015
Overall study end date01/02/2019

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 75; UK Sample Size: 75. Final Sample Size: 75.
Participant inclusion criteria1. Aged over 70 years 
2. Unilateral hip fracture requiring hemiarthroplasty, dynamic hip screw, proximal femoral nail fixation
3. Able to provide consent for trial participation
Participant exclusion criteria1. Patients due to undergo total hip arthroplasty
2. Patients with peri-prosthetic fractures
3. Patients without capacity
4. Pre-operative elevated troponin (measured for clinical reasons)
Recruitment start date01/10/2016
Recruitment end date01/10/2017

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

Queen’s Medical Centre
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
Royal Sussex County Hospital
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
Eastern Road
Brighton
BN2 5BE
United Kingdom
Peterborough City Hospital
Edith Cavell Campus
Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Trust
Bretton Gate
Peterborough
PE3 9GZ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Nottingham
Hospital/treatment centre

Research and Graduate Services
King's Meadow Campus
Lenton Lane
Nottingham
NG7 2NR
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01ee9ar58

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/06/2019
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot expected to be made available
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a peer reviewed scientific journal
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 25/07/2017 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

14/01/2019: The following changes have been made:
1. The intention to publish date has been changed from 31/07/2018 to 01/06/2019.
2. The final enrolment number has been added.
27/07/2017: Publication reference added.