Is motivational interviewing and/or cognitive behavioural group therapy an effective treatment for pathological gambling?

ISRCTN ISRCTN92322614
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN92322614
Secondary identifying numbers SNIPH-gambling
Submission date
15/10/2008
Registration date
13/11/2008
Last edited
04/07/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Dr Per Carlbring
Scientific

Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning
Linköping University
LINKOPING
SE-581 83
Sweden

Phone +46 (0)13 28 10 00
Email per.carlbring@liu.se

Study information

Study designA single-centre, randomised controlled interventional trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleMotivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioural group therapy in the treatment of pathological gambling
Study objectives1. What treatment effect does four sessions of motivational interviewing have on problematic/pathological gambling compared to a waitlist?
2. What treatment effect does eight sessions of cognitive behavioural group therapy have on problematic/pathological gambling compared to a waitlist?
3. Is either motivational interviewing or cognitive behavioural group therapy a superior treatment for problematic/pathological gambling?
4. Can treatment response be predicted?
Ethics approval(s)Karolinska Institute (vetting the ethics of research involving humans [Regionala etikprövningsnämnden i Stockholm]) gave approval on the 18th May 2005 (ref: 2005/452-31)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedProblematic or pathological gambling
InterventionDuring eight weeks a participant was randomised to either four sessions of motivational interviewing, eight sessions of group cognitive behaviour therapy or a waitlist. Participants were assessed at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 6 month follow-up and 12 month follow-up.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureNational Opinion Research Center (NORC) Diagnostic Screen for Gambling Problems (NODS), measured at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 6 month follow-up and 12 month follow-up.
Secondary outcome measures1. Time-line follow-back to track the frequency, intensity and other aspects of gambling
2. Anxiety and depression: the Beck Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory
3. Predictors: Readiness to Change Questionnaire, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, and the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test

Measured at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 6 month follow-up and 12 month follow-up.
Overall study start date16/06/2005
Completion date10/03/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants450
Total final enrolment150
Key inclusion criteria1. Anyone presenting with pathological gambling as primary diagnosis
2. Aged at least 18 years old, either sex
3. Willing to be randomised
Key exclusion criteria1. Suicidality
2. Other ongoing treatment for pathological gambling
3. Recently started taking or recently changed medication for anxiety and/or depression
Date of first enrolment16/06/2005
Date of final enrolment10/03/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Sweden

Study participating centre

Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning
LINKOPING
SE-581 83
Sweden

Sponsor information

Swedish National Institute of Public Health (SNIPH) (Sweden)
Government

Forskarens väg 3
Ostersund
SE-831 40
Sweden

Phone +46 (0)63 19 96 00
Email info@fhi.se
Website http://www.fhi.se/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05x4m5564

Funders

Funder type

Government

Swedish National Institute of Public Health (SNIPH) (Sweden)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/05/2010 04/07/2019 Yes No

Editorial Notes

04/07/2019: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.