The FAB Study: Feedback, Awareness and Behaviour in the Fenland Study
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN92551397 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN92551397 |
| Protocol serial number | N/A |
| Sponsor | Medical Research Council (UK) |
| Funder | Medical Research Council (UK) |
- Submission date
- 29/08/2007
- Registration date
- 11/09/2007
- Last edited
- 27/09/2013
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Scientific
MRC Epidemiology Unit
Institute of Metabolic Science
Box 285
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)1223 330 315 |
|---|---|
| simon.griffin@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Cohort study with randomisation to one of four different physical activity feedback groups (following participation in the Fenland Study) |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Scientific title | |
| Study acronym | FAB |
| Study objectives | Aim: To quantify the effect of measurement and feedback on physical activity behaviour Measurement objectives: 1. Self awareness of physical activity levels 2. Effect of measurement on awareness 3. Effect of feedback on awareness and intentions 4. Effect of feedback on behaviour 5. Level of false reassurance More details can be found at: http://www.mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk/Research/Studies/FAB/index.html |
| Ethics approval(s) | Full ethical approval received from Cambridgshire 2 Research Ethics Committee on 03/05/2007 (ref: 07/Q0108/79) |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Physical activity behaviour |
| Intervention | The FAB Study has been set up as a nested cohort study within the Fenland Study, but with a very different purpose, and with separate ethical approval. Volunteers in the Fenland Study have agreed to undergo oral glucose tolerance test and precise measurement of body anthropometry, body composition and physical activity over a one-week period (using individually calibrated Actihearts which measure heart rate and movement). Those who volunteer for FAB are randomly allocated to one of four groups: Group 1: Control group - no feedback Group 2: Physical activity feedback type A - Physical Activity Level (PAL) Group 3: Physical activity feedback type B - PAL + daily heart rate and movement printouts Group 4: Physical activity feedback type C - PAL + daily heart rate and movement printouts + goal setting and modelling information |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Objectively measured physical activity over 1 week (one month post-feedback), using a combined heart rate and movement sensor. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Self-reported physical activity - RPAQ (baseline, and 1 month after feedback) |
| Completion date | 03/06/2008 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 400 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Aged 30-55 years 2. Registered with participating general practices in the Cambridgeshire Primary Care Trust 3. Participating in the Fenland Study |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Have diagnosed diabetes 2. Have a terminal illness with a prognosis of less than 1 year 3. Suffer from psychotic illness 4. Are pregnant or lactating 5. Are unable to walk unaided |
| Date of first enrolment | 03/09/2007 |
| Date of final enrolment | 03/06/2008 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 16/09/2013 | Yes | No | |
| Protocol article | protocol | 18/03/2010 | Yes | No |