Is Gem-Doce an alternative to BCG treatment for people with early bladder cancer?
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN92816346 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN92816346 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT) | Nil known |
| Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) | Nil known |
| Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) | 1008661 |
| Protocol serial number | CPMS 57987, ICR-CTSU/2024/10091 |
| Sponsor | Institute of Cancer Research |
| Funder | Health Technology Assessment Programme |
- Submission date
- 22/07/2025
- Registration date
- 31/07/2025
- Last edited
- 31/07/2025
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Overall study status
- Ongoing
- Condition category
- Cancer
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
The COBRA study is looking at a new treatment called Gem-Doce for people with early bladder cancer. The usual treatment, called BCG, has been used for over 40 years but often causes unpleasant side effects like bladder pain and flu-like symptoms. Many people don’t finish the full course of BCG, and for some, the cancer still comes back or gets worse. The study aims to find out if Gem-Doce works just as well as BCG at stopping bladder cancer from returning, but with fewer side effects. It will also look at how the treatments affect people’s quality of life and the cost of each option.
Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 years and over across the UK who have recently been diagnosed with early bladder cancer and would normally be treated with BCG may be invited to take part
What does the study involve?
People who join the study will be randomly given either BCG or Gem-Doce treatment. Both treatments are given directly into the bladder during hospital visits over 2 years. Everyone will have regular check-ups for five years, just like they would if they weren’t in the study.
Participants may also be asked to fill in optional questionnaires about their quality of life and healthcare use. These include questions about how they’re feeling and how the treatment affects their daily life. There’s also a short survey about background information, which is optional and confidential.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Taking part could help researchers find a better treatment for bladder cancer in the future. Gem-Doce may cause fewer side effects than BCG, but both treatments can still cause discomfort, such as pain when passing urine or flu-like symptoms. Severe side effects are rare, and all participants will be fully informed before deciding whether to take part.
People in the Gem-Doce group will have seven more treatment visits than those receiving BCG, but travel costs for these extra visits will be reimbursed.
Where is the study run from?
The Institute of Cancer Research (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July 2025 to January 2032
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (UK)
Who is the main contact?
cobra-icrctsu@icr.ac.uk
Plain English summary under review with external organisation
Contact information
Public, Scientific
The Institute of Cancer Research
15 Cotswold Road
Sutton
SM2 5NG
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 20 87224238 |
|---|---|
| cobra-icrctsu@icr.ac.uk |
Principal investigator
Fulham Palace Road
London
W6 8RF
United Kingdom
| cobra-icrctsu@icr.ac.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Interventional randomized parallel-group controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised parallel trial |
| Scientific title | Combination chemotherapy versus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer– a phase III multi-centre randomised controlled trial (COBRA) |
| Study acronym | COBRA |
| Study objectives | The main objective of the COBRA trial is to investigate whether Gem-Doce treatment, put into the bladder, has similar treatment success rates to the standard treatment, BCG. We will assess whether it is similar at preventing disease returning, which has a high risk of progressing into more advanced cancer, which is life-threatening. Secondary objectives: 1. To investigate whether Gem-Doce has similar rates as BCG in: any return or progression of bladder cancer after treatment, need for surgical removal of the bladder (cystectomy), death from cancer or any cause. 2. To compare side effects and the ability to complete a full course of each treatment 3. To investigate health-related quality of life as reported by participants. 4. To investigate the costs to the NHS and the cost-effectiveness of Gem-Doce treatment in comparison to BCG. |
| Ethics approval(s) |
Not yet submitted, ref: 25/SC/0262 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | High-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer |
| Intervention | Patients will receive up to four treatments in different sequences. Randomisation process: Sequential randomisation by computer-generated random permuted blocks. Treatment 1: BCG bladder instillations Methodology: Intravesical BCG instillations Generic drug name: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin The dosage given: BCG (50 mg in 50 ml sodium chloride 0.9%) Method of administration: Intravesical delivery Frequency of administration: Six once-weekly induction intravesical instillations. Maintenance therapy delivered in three once-weekly instillations at months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 (15 instillations) until 24 months from the start of induction treatment Total duration of treatment: 24 months Treatment 2: Gem-Doce bladder instillations Methodology: Sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel instillations Generic drug name: Gemcitabine and docetaxel The dosage given: Gemcitabine (1 g in 50 ml sodium chloride 0.9%) and Docetaxel (40 mg in 50 ml sodium chloride 0.9%) Method of administration: Intravesical delivery Frequency of administration: Six once-weekly induction intravesical instillations. Maintenance therapy delivered once-monthly from months 3 - 24 (22 instillations) until 24 months from the start of induction treatment Total duration of treatment: 24 months Follow-up: Clinical follow-up to 2 years post-treatment will inform the primary analysis. Thereafter, all participants will be followed up according to NICE guidelines. |
| Intervention type | Drug |
| Phase | Phase III |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, gemcitabine, docetaxel |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
High-grade recurrence-free survival (hgRFS), i.e. time to first identification of high-grade recurrent disease, stage progression, metastatic disease or death from any cause. The primary analysis of hgRFS is planned to take place once the target number of events has been observed, expected when participants have at least 2 years of follow-up and have completed study treatment. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Recurrence-free survival, defined in whole days as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of confirmed recurrence of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (includes all events described in the primary endpoint, as well as recurrences of any grade); analysis after approximately 2 years follow-up (at the time of the primary endpoint). |
| Completion date | 31/01/2032 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 520 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures 2. Age >=18 years 3. WHO performance status 0-3 4. A new diagnosis of high-risk urothelial NMIBC with no variant histology: 4.1. pT1 G2-3/high grade tumour (with or without CIS) OR 4.2. pTa G3/high grade tumours (with or without CIS) OR 4.3. Isolated carcinoma in situ (CIS) 5. Complete papillary tumour removal (apart from residual CIS) via TURBT 6. All patients with pT1 at initial TURBT should have had re-TURBT if there was no muscle in initial TURBT specimens. Re-resection should also be considered for patients with HG Ta if no muscle was present or for patients with HG T1 with muscle present at initial TURBT, according to local practice 7. Willing to use an effective method of contraception 8. Willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Any previous history of urothelial cancer 2. History of pure non-urothelial cell bladder cancer (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma) 3. Evidence of neuroendocrine (small/ large cell) sarcomatoid, micropapillary or plasmacytoid variant urothelial cell cancer 4. Any urethral involvement 5. Any medical condition that contraindicates study treatment, including any known allergy to gemcitabine, docetaxel or BCG 6. Known pregnancy and/or currently breastfeeding 7. Known HIV, Hepatitis B or C with detectable viral load within 30 days prior to randomisation 8. Ongoing immunosuppressive medication, including steroids (>10 mg/day) - people receiving short courses (two weeks maximum) of steroids due to be discontinued prior to randomisation or using inhaled and topical steroids are eligible for randomisation 9. Active or treated malignancy within 1 year of randomisation (not including non-melanomatous skin carcinoma, NICE low-risk prostate cancer (T1/T2a, Gleason 6 PSA <10), in situ carcinoma of any site) |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/08/2025 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/07/2029 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
| IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from cobra-icrctsu@icr.ac.uk |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study website | Study website | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
Editorial Notes
23/07/2025: Trial's existence confirmed by NHS HRA.