Decision for reconstructive interventions of the upper extremities in tetraplegia: the effect of treatment characteristics

ISRCTN ISRCTN93725261
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN93725261
Secondary identifying numbers 014-32-026 and 96-06-004, NL422 (NTR462)
Submission date
26/02/2007
Registration date
26/02/2007
Last edited
26/08/2021
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr G Snoek
Scientific

Roessingh Research and Development B.V.
Reoessinghsbleekweg 33 B
Enschede
7522 AH
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)53 487 5777
Email g.snoek@rrd.nl

Study information

Study designSurvey
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designMulti-centre
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeOther
Scientific titleDecision for reconstructive interventions of the upper extremities in tetraplegia: the effect of treatment characteristics
Study objectivesTo assess the effect of treatment characteristics on the decisions made by subjects with tetraplegia concerning reconstructive interventions for the upper extremities.
Ethics approval(s)Approval received from the Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie ( Medical-ethical board) of Roesingh Rehabilitation Centre on the 27th February 2002 (ref: 02.08.7.2).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSpinal cord injury
InterventionSeven specialised spinal cord injury centres in the Netherlands. 53 individuals with tetraplegia in a stable condition were surveyed on the importance and the relative weight of seven treatment characteristics:
1. Type of intervention
2. Number of operations
3. Inpatient rehabilitation period
4. Outpatient rehabilitation period
5. Risk of complications
6. Results of elbow function
7. Results of hand function
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureImportance and the relative weight of seven treatment characteristics on the decision to undergo reconstructive surgery determined by means of Conjoint Analysis.
Secondary outcome measuresNo secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date05/09/2002
Completion date01/02/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants53
Total final enrolment49
Key inclusion criteria1. A motor complete C5, C6 or C7 Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), according to the guidelines of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA)
2. At least one arm classified as motor group one to four according to the International Classification for Surgery of the Upper Limb in Tetraplegia
3. Subjects had to be medically and neurologically stable
4. At least one year after the initial injury
5. Possible candidates for surgical reconstruction of elbow extension and palmar and/or lateral grasp function
Key exclusion criteria1. Previously undergone surgery to improve Upper Extremity (UE) function
2. Extensively informed about these interventions
3. Declined treatment in the past five years
Date of first enrolment05/09/2002
Date of final enrolment01/02/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

Roessingh Research and Development B.V.
Enschede
7522 AH
Netherlands

Sponsor information

Roessingh Research and Development B.V. (The Netherlands)
Industry

P.O. Box 310
Enschede
7500 AH
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)53 487 5777
Email info@rrd.nl
Website http://www.rrd.nl/www/indexa.html
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01dmjt679

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (The Netherlands)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article 07/08/2007 26/08/2021 Yes No

Editorial Notes

26/08/2021: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The total final enrolment was added.