A randomised trial of placement of Mirena at caesarean section or postpartum

ISRCTN ISRCTN94164946
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN94164946
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
15/02/2010
Registration date
22/04/2010
Last edited
18/03/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Kathleen Braniff
Scientific

Mackay Base Hospital
Bridge Road
Mackay
4740
Australia

Phone +61 (0)7 49686000
Email kathleen_braniff@health.qld.gov.au

Study information

Study designMulticentre randomised open-label pilot study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeOther
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details below to request a patient information sheet.
Scientific titleA multicentre, randomised trial of placement of the Mirena, intrauterine contraceptive device at caesarean section or postpartum
Study objectivesInsertion of Mirena at time of caesarean section is a safe effective contraceptive option
Ethics approval(s)Not available at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedContraception
InterventionInsertion of Mirena either at the time of elective caesarean section or at the usual time of 6 weeks postpartum with follow up until 6 months postpartum
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureExpulsion of Mirena

For the group having Mirena inserted at the time of caesarean section, all outcomes will be measured 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after delivery.
For the group who have the Mirena inserted 6 weeks after delivery, primary and secondary outcomes will be measured 3 months and 6 months after delivery.
Secondary outcome measures1. Breastfeeding rates and breastfeeding difficulties
2. Babies’ weight gain
3. Vaginal bleeding
4. Pelvic infection
5. Strings not visible
6. Uterine perforation
7. Malposition of the device within the cavity
8. Ovarian cysts
9. Pregnancy
10. Patient satisfaction
Data for most variables above will be categorical (yes or no).
Infant weight gain (g) and estimated number of days vaginal bleeding in the past month will be numeric.
Patient satisfaction will be rated 1-5, from very poor to excellent.

For the group having Mirena inserted at the time of caesarean section, all outcomes will be measured 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after delivery.
For the group who have the Mirena inserted 6 weeks after delivery, primary and secondary outcomes will be measured 3 months and 6 months after delivery.
Overall study start date01/05/2010
Completion date30/04/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participants100
Key inclusion criteriaWomen having an elective caesarean section, who choose to use Mirena for contraception
Key exclusion criteria1. Suspected uterine infection
2. Uterine malformation
3. Cervical dysplasia
Date of first enrolment01/05/2010
Date of final enrolment30/04/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Australia

Study participating centre

Mackay Base Hospital
Mackay
4740
Australia

Sponsor information

Mackay District of Queensland Health (Australia)
Government

c/o Dr David Farlow
Director of Medical Services Mackay District
Mackay Base Hospital
Mackay, Queensland
4740
Australia

Phone +61 (0)4 17754042
Email kathleen_braniff@health.qld.gov.au
Website http://www.health.qld.gov.au/mackay/default.asp
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00c1dt378

Funders

Funder type

Government

Mackay District of Queensland Health (Australia)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/06/2015 Yes No

Editorial Notes

18/03/2016: Publication reference added.