Gaze training to improve performance during ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia

ISRCTN ISRCTN95101668
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN95101668
Sponsor University of Nottingham
Funder Umm Al-Qura University
Submission date
24/12/2025
Registration date
30/12/2025
Last edited
30/12/2025
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Regional anaesthesia is the performance of spinal, epidural or peripheral nerve blocks to provide post-operative pain relief. Anaesthetists inject local anaesthetic using specialist blunt-tipped needles close to nerves to prevent transmission of pain. Hand-held ultrasound is often used by anaesthetists to direct these needles to the correct position i.e. close to, but not in the nerve itself (so-called ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia, UGRA). If the needle is not adequately seen using the hand-held ultrasound it may pierce the nerve causing permanent nerve damage and significant patient harm. All anaesthetists should be trained in the safe performance of UGRA according to new postgraduate medical curricula issued by the UK Royal College of Anaesthetists.

Within the time and resource constraints of postgraduate medical training (with lack of access to real-world educational opportunities in clinical training), it would be advantageous to optimise acquisition of practical UGRA skills with a self-directed educational intervention which can be administered away from the bedside. Therefore, our aim is to test whether a single episode of gaze training is associated with improved performance at an ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block task compared with standard self-directed practice. Based on previous work in the field of laparoscopic skill acquisition we hypothesise that gaze control training will improve the technical performance of an ultrasound-guided needle task.

Who can participate?
Qualified medical doctors enrolled in a Royal College of Anaesthetists Stage 1 training programme (novice group), and a small group of consultant anaesthetists with regular clinical experience in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia (expert group). All participants must be aged 18 years or older.

What does the study involve?
Each participant will attend a single study visit lasting approximately two hours at the Queen's Medical Centre - University of Nottingham. Participants will complete informed consent, questionnaires these include measures of anxiety, mood, sleepiness, and visuospatial ability. Perform a simulated ultrasound-guided needle task, and wear eye-tracking glasses while completing the task. Novice participants will then be randomly allocated to either a gaze training group or a self-directed (discovery learning) group. All novice participants will repeat the task after training. Performance will be assessed by trained assessors using standardised scoring tools and eye-tracking measurements.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants may benefit from additional educational experience and insight into their performance, although there may be no direct personal benefit. The risks are minimal and include mild fatigue or temporary discomfort from wearing eye-tracking equipment. The task is performed on a bench model and not on patients, so there is no clinical risk.

Where is the study run from?
The study will be conducted at the Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery & Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2026 to December 2026.

Who is funding the study?
This study forms part of a PhD programme funded by Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia. The sponsor of the study is the University of Nottingham, UK.

Who is the main contact?
Osama Natto, PhD Research Student in Anaesthesia, Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery & Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK, osama.natto1@nottingham.ac.uk

Contact information

Dr David Hewson
Principal investigator

Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care
Queen’s Medical Centre
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Room E/C 1719
C Floor, East Block
Queen’s Medical Centre
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-5314-8522
Phone +44 7778 178639
Email David.Hewson@nottingham.ac.uk
None Osama Natto
Scientific, Public

Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery & Inflammation Sciences
School of Medicine
University of Nottingham
Room E/C 1722
C Floor, East Block
Queen’s Medical Centre
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0009-0006-6305-5182
Phone +447949826880
Email OSAMA.NATTO1@nottingham.ac.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
AllocationRandomized controlled trial
MaskingBlinded (masking used)
ControlActive
AssignmentParallel
PurposeHealth services research
Scientific titleThe effect of gaze training on task performance, safety, and skill acquisition during ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial
Study acronymGAZE Trial
Study objectivesThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether a gaze-training educational intervention improves task performance during a simulated ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia procedure compared with discovery learning. Secondary objectives are to describe differences in eye-tracking metrics and objective performance measures between novice and expert participants, and to explore how gaze behaviour relates to skill acquisition.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 21/11/2025, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee (Research Ethics Committee, E41, E Floor, (next to School of Life Sciences Reception), Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, NG7 2UH, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom; louise.sabir@nottingham.ac.uk; fmhs-researchethics@nottingham.ac.uk), ref: FMHS 36-1025

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTraining and performance in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia among anaesthesia clinicians.
InterventionParticipants will attend a single study visit. All novice participants will first complete a simulated ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia (UGRA) needle insertion task on a sciatic nerve model (Task 1). The goal is to accurately place the needle toward the target structure located at 6 o’clock using the in-plane technique. Task performance will be independently evaluated by two assessors using the Global Rating Scale (GRS) and the Composite Error Score (CES). Additionally, eye-tracking data will be recorded concurrently.

Novice participants will then be randomised in a 1:1 ratio using opaque, sequentially numbered, sealed envelopes to receive either a gaze-training educational intervention or discovery learning. One assessor will be blinded to group allocation and will not be present during envelope opening or delivery of the educational intervention; this assessor will attend only the task assessments.

In the gaze-training group, participants will watch a brief, standardised video demonstrating expert visual behaviour during an ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia procedure. After that, participants will complete five supervised practice attempts using the eye-tracking glasses, during which participants will have to replicate the expert gaze patterns. The control group will undertake discovery learning, and participants will complete five independent UGRA task attempts without receiving any specific gaze-related instruction or guidance.

Following the intervention, novice participants will repeat the UGRA task (Task 2) under identical conditions, with performance again independently assessed by two assessors using GRS and CES.

Expert participants will complete the initial UGRA task only and will not be randomised.
Intervention typeBehavioural
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. Procedural performance during ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia measured using the Composite Error Score (CES) assessed by two independent assessors at immediately following completion of Task 1 and Task 2 during a single study visit
  2. Procedural performance during ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia measured using the Global Rating Scale (GRS) assessed by two independent assessors at immediately following completion of Task 1 and Task 2 during a single study visit
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
  1. Task completion time measured using the time in seconds to complete the needling task at immediately following completion of Task 1 and Task 2 during a single study visit
  2. Visual attention behaviour during UGRA measured using eye-tracking metrics including fixation total duration, fixation count, fixation time, glance count, saccade count at immediately following completion of Task 1 and Task 2 during a single study visit
Completion date31/12/2026

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit120 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration53
Total final enrolment53
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged 18 years or older.
2. Qualified medical doctors currently enrolled in a Royal College of Anaesthetists training programme for Stage 1 training.
3. Consultant anaesthetist with regular clinical exposure to Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia.
Key exclusion criteriaPrevious experience of gaze training or eye-tracking software applied to medical interventions.
Date of first enrolment12/01/2026
Date of final enrolment31/03/2026

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust - Queen's Medical Centre Campus
Nottingham University Hospital
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
England

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryData sharing statement to be made available at a later date
IPD sharing plan

Editorial Notes

24/12/2025: Study’s existence confirmed by the Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee, Nottingham University Hospitals, UK.