Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fluoroscopy for imaging childhood vesicoureteric reflux

ISRCTN ISRCTN98320102
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN98320102
Protocol serial number 6149
Sponsor Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Funder National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK) - Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme
Submission date
07/07/2010
Registration date
07/07/2010
Last edited
27/07/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Ms Wendy Phillips
Scientific

Radiology, Box 162
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom

Email wendyphillips@addenbrookes.nhs.uk

Study information

Primary study designObservational
Study designSingle-centre non-randomised observational diagnosis and validation of investigative process trial
Secondary study designCohort study
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) replacement of x-ray fluoroscopy in paediatric imaging: an investigation of vesicoureteric reflux
Study objectivesX-ray fluoroscopy is widely used for diagnosing suspected serious childhood abnormalities such as urinary tract abnormalities, despite the induced solid malignancy risk secondary to ionising radiation exposure. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered safer than X-rays, but fluoroscopy-like MRI techniques have not yet been developed for paediatric applications, where the avoidance of ionising radiation would be of great benefit. Development requires the integration and adaptation of MR technologies to support the study of small children in the relatively hostile environment of an MR system, and evidence that similar results to X-ray fluoroscopy are achievable.

Aims:
1. To develop robust MR applications based on recently developed MR technology for childhood abnormalities of the renal tract (vesicoureteric reflux and posterior urethral valves).
2. To evaluate the technical and diagnostic performance of the MR technique by direct comparison with the established X-ray fluoroscopy based techniques.
Ethics approval(s)Cambridgeshire 3 Research Ethics Committee, 26/06/2008, ref: 08/H0306/39
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTopic: Generic Health Relevance and Cross Cutting Themes; Subtopic: Generic Health Relevance (all Subtopics); Disease: Paediatrics
InterventionAll patients volunteering for this study will undergo conventional XR fluoroscopy as per standard care, followed by an additional MRI examination. Data collection involves completion of demographic proformas, parent questionnaires, and real-time acquisition of radiological images which will be assessed and stored for retrospective analysis. The two examinations are expected to take place within 24 hours of each other. The conventional X-ray studies will be reported immediately following normal practice and allowing for clinical management and decision making. Both the XR and MRI studies will be reported for the presence/absence of posterior urethral ballooning during voiding and the presence and grade of any VUR using the conventional established grading scheme. In each case the person supervising and reporting the respective studies will not be aware of the results of the other investigation.

There is no follow-up as part of this study, but patients will be treated as per standard care on the basis of the results from their XR fluoroscopy examination.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure(s)

The ability of the MR fluoroscopy examination to accurately detect:
1. Significant grade VUR likely to alter clinical management
2. The presence of posterior urethral ballooning

Assessed at the time of the intervention

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Assessed at the time of the intervention:
1. Image quality
2. Artifacts

Completion date01/09/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit0 Years
Upper age limit3 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration50
Key inclusion criteria1. All children (usually boys) between the ages of 0 and 3 years referred for direct micturating cysto-urethrography (MCUG)
2. All children with hydronephrosis diagnosed antenatally on foetal ultrasound
3. Age range: 0 days - 3 years, male and female
Key exclusion criteria1. Usual MR exclusion criteria will apply, but are highly unlikely in this age group. The include pregnancy, claustrophobia, cardiac pacemakers, metallic implants, cardiac defibrillator implants, aneurysm clips or metallic heart valves, and cochlear or inner ear implants. These exclusion criteria clearly apply to all people within the vicinity of the MRI scanner, and therefore apply equally to the parents/guardians in this study.
2. Previous reaction to the relevant x-ray or MRI contrast medium (including gadolinium)
3. Congenital abnormalities that make X-ray fluoroscopy of MR fluoroscopy impractical
Date of first enrolment01/09/2008
Date of final enrolment01/09/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Addenbrookes Hospital
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Wendy Phillips (wendyphillips@addenbrookes.nhs.uk).

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/03/2013 Yes No
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes

Editorial Notes

27/07/2017: IPD sharing statement added.
28/04/2017: Publication reference added.