A double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MBP8298 in subjects with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS)

ISRCTN ISRCTN98373474
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN98373474
Secondary identifying numbers MBP8298-01
Submission date
13/06/2005
Registration date
20/09/2005
Last edited
01/07/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nervous System Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Mark Freedman
Scientific

501 Smyth Road
Ottawa
K1H 8L6
Canada

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific title
Study objectivesThe major clinical hypothesis is that MBP8298 will significantly delay the progression of disability, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), in subjects diagnosed with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis and who are human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR2 and/or DR4 positive.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSecondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
InterventionAn intravenous administration of MBP peptide versus placebo
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)MBP8298
Primary outcome measureTo compare the clinical efficacy of 500 mg MBP8298 given intravenously every 6 months for a period of 2 years, to placebo, in subjects diagnosed with SPMS who are positive for the HLA DR2 and/or DR4 haplotype. Clinical efficacy is defined as a statistically and clinically significant increase in the time to confirmed worsening of disability as measured by EDSS.
Secondary outcome measures1. To assess safety of MBP8298 synthetic peptide in all subjects irrespective of genotype
2. To compare the clinical efficacy of 500 mg MBP8298 given intravenously every 6 months for a period of 2 years, to placebo, in subjects diagnosed with SPMS who are negative for the HLA DR2 and/or DR4 haplotype. Clinical efficacy is defined as a statistically and clinically significant increase in the time to confirmed worsening of disability as measured by EDSS.
3. To assess the effects of MBP8298 on MRI parameters:
3.1. Activity analysis (T2 lesions, Gadolinium-enhancing lesions)
3.2. Lesion burden (T2 burden of disease, chronic T1 black holes)
3.3. Atrophy (brain and cervical cord)
4. To confirm that treatment with MBP8298 induces immunological tolerance or shift in functional response profile to MBP peptide (82-98) and determine whether this is dependent on HLA subtype
5. To determine whether MBP8298 induces immunological tolerance or shift in functional response profile to other MBP epitopes and other myelin antigens (e.g., proteolipid protein [PLP], myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein [MOG]), indicating the stop of epitope spreading and whether this too is dependent on HLA subtype
6. To confirm the ratio of HLA DR2/4 positive to HLA DR2/4 negative subjects in the SPMS population
7. To determine whether MBP8298 induces an improvement in the quality of life of SPMS patients, as determined by the MSQoL-54 (SF-36 plus 18 MS-specific questions in Sweden and Norway)
Overall study start date06/12/2004
Completion date01/05/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit65 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants553
Key inclusion criteria1. Male or female subjects, 18-65 years of age
2. Documented history of SPMS. SPMS is defined as an MS patient who has been diagnosed with MS for at least 3 years, and in the 3-year period prior to enrolment must have documented progression of their pyramidal or cerebellar Kurtzke functional subscores (FSS) in the absence of acute relapses. (In the absence of documented FSS changes, clinical notes documenting changes consistent with these changes will be acceptable). The subject must also have experienced at least one acute relapse as part of their diagnosis of Relapsing/Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Only one relapse prior to diagnosis of MS can be in accordance with the McDonald diagnostic criteria as long as cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings consistent with the diagnosis of MS are also present.
3. Absence of relapse in the 3 months prior to baseline
4. EDSS of 3.5 – 6.5
5. Pyramidal or Cerebellar FSS ≥3
6. Subject must be able and willing to give meaningful, written informed consent prior to participation in the trial, in accordance with regulatory requirements
7. In the Investigator’s opinion, subjects must be reliable, compliant, and agree to cooperate with all trial evaluations
Key exclusion criteria1. Diagnosis of Primary Progressive MS
2. Subjects have previously received MBP8298
3. Any known malignancy, or history of malignancy, with the exclusion of basal cell carcinoma
4. Steroid therapy within 30 days prior to first dose, or any other treatment known to be used for putative or experimental MS treatment
5. Therapy with ß-interferon, glatiramer acetate, mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, azathioprine, or any other immuno-modulating (e.g., intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIG]) or immunosuppressive drugs, including recombinant or non-recombinant cytokines or plasma exchange, within 6 months prior to performance of the first study-specific test, with the exception of corticosteroids or adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) for relapse treatment.
6. Initiation of therapy with 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) or 3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP)
7. History of anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions to glatiramer acetate
8. Abnormal laboratory values at the Baseline Visit deemed by the Investigator to be clinically significant
9. Known allergy to Gadolinium-DTPA
10. Treatment at any time with Cladribine, total lymphoid irradiation, monoclonal antibody treatment e.g. anti-CD4, anti-CD52, anti-VLA4, anti-CD20
11. Treatment at any time with an altered peptide ligand
12. Any conditions that could interfere with the performance of study-specific procedures (e.g., MRI)
13. Previous randomization to this study
14. Known positivity for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C
15. Participation in any other non-MS clinical trial within 30 days prior to performance of the first study-specific test (the screening/baseline visit), or any investigational therapy in the past 6 months
16. Females who are breastfeeding, pregnant (pregnancy test at screening), or not using a medically approved method of contraception regularly
17. Known or suspected current or past alcohol or drug abuse (within the last year)
18. Any medical, psychiatric or other condition that could result in a subject not being able to give fully informed consent, or to comply with the protocol requirements
19. Any other condition that, in the Investigator’s opinion, makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study
Date of first enrolment06/12/2004
Date of final enrolment01/05/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Canada
  • Denmark
  • Estonia
  • Finland
  • Germany
  • Latvia
  • Netherlands
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

501 Smyth Road
Ottawa
K1H 8L6
Canada

Sponsor information

BioMS Technology Corp (Canada)
Industry

6030 - 88 Street
Edmonton
T6E 6G4
Canada

Phone +1 780 413 7152
Email tverco@biomsmedical.com
Website http://www.biomsmedical.com
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03fvjvp95

Funders

Funder type

Industry

BioMS Technology Corp (Canada)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 18/10/2011 Yes No