Trial to compare the Airway Management Device (AMD) with the Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway™

ISRCTN ISRCTN00263336
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN00263336
Protocol serial number N0212075199
Sponsor Department of Health (UK)
Funder Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust (UK)
Submission date
12/09/2003
Registration date
12/09/2003
Last edited
06/03/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr T Cook
Scientific

Department of Anaesthetics
Royal United Hospital
Bath & North East Somerset Council
Bath
BA1 3NG
United Kingdom

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesTo compare the performance of the Airway Management Device (AMD) with the Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway™ during insertion, maintenance and removal in anaesthetised adult patients.
Ethics approval(s)Research Ethics Committee of Royal United Hospital Bath approved the study
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSurgery: Anaesthesia
InterventionAirway Management Device versus the Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway™ during surgery in anaesthetised patients.
Intervention typeDevice
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)
Primary outcome measure(s)

Success of airway placement

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. Time to achieve an airway
2. Airway manipulations required
3. Complications during use
4. Fibre-optic assessment of airway positioning

Completion date30/04/2003

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexAll
Target sample size at registration100
Key inclusion criteriaAdult patients undergoing surgery requiring general anaesthetic which would normally involve using LMA
Key exclusion criteria1. Any pathology of the neck or the upper respiratory or upper alimentary tract
2. At risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents
3. Weight less than 50 kg or greater than 100 kg
Date of first enrolment01/09/2000
Date of final enrolment30/04/2003

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Department of Anaesthetics
Bath
BA1 3NG
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/11/2003 Yes No