Comparison of post-discharge physiotherapy versus usual care following total knee replacement: a randomised clinical trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN07624314
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN07624314
Secondary identifying numbers N0176127673
Submission date
30/09/2004
Registration date
30/09/2004
Last edited
10/09/2012
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mrs Catherine Minns Lowe
Scientific

Physiotherapy Research Unit
The Nuffield Orthoapedic Centre NHS Trust
Windmill Road
Oxford
OX3 7LD
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1865 737526
Email catherine.minnslowe@noc.anglox.nhs.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesPlease note that as of 02/07/2008 this record was extensively updated due to service structure changes. All updates can be seen under the relevant field, under the update date of 02/07/2008. The previous title of the trial was ‘Is the intervention of primary care physiotherapy effective in improving mobility and function after elective joint surgery in a Diagnostic and Treatment Centre?’ The current target number of participants has also been changed to 107 patients; the previous target number of participants was 250 patients.

Current hypothesis as of 02/07/2008:
The study will evaluate the intervention of an innovative physiotherapist for patients undergoing elective primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis; the ability to improve mobility and enhance functional activity compared with standard care. The study will also document the effect of the intervention on health resource utilisation and include an economic evaluation.

Previous hypothesis:
The study will evaluate the intervention of a community physiotherapist for patients undergoing arthroplasty specifically; the ability to improve mobility and enhance functional activity compared with standard care. The study will also document the effect of Diagnostic and Treatment Centre surgery on primary care resource use and include an economic evaluation.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from The Oxford Local Research Ethics Committee on the 20th August 2003 (AQREC No: A03.018). Trial amendments were approved via substantive amendment (amendment 1 date = 23/05/2005, amendment 2 date = 18/10/2006). Date of approval runs from 20th August 2003 until 30th April 2009.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSurgery: post-operative care
InterventionCurrent interventions as of 02/07/2008:
The intervention group patients received two physiotherapy home visits. The first visit took place within two weeks of discharge and the second visit was 6 - 8 weeks post-operatively. The intervention consisted of these two home visits. During each visit the physiotherapist assessed the participant’s function and progressed each participant’s rehabilitation programme as appropriate. Objective reassessment of range of movement, muscle strength and observation of functional activities (including transfers, gait, posture and balance) occurred to enable this progression of treatment. Gait re-education and progression/removal of walking aids, task specific training and a daily home exercise programme were included. The exercises were defined following a systematic review.

The control arm received the usual care currently provided by the hospital with no additional input. Usual care includes no routine physiotherapy organised post discharge.

All trial participants (both arms) received a knee advice booklet presently used by the hospital to standardise the advice provided. The advice and exercises contained in these booklets are essentially similar to those used as controls in previous trials. The exercises include non weight bearing exercises to regain range of movement plus isometric strengthening exercises and several exercises in weightbearing

Previous interventions:
Community physiotherapist versus standard care.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureCurrent primary outcome measures as of 02/07/2008:
Oxford Knee Score.

Trial patients underwent reassessment, using all outcome measures, at three and twelve months post-operatively by a physiotherapist blind to trial arm allocation. Patients were also followed up at six months post-operatively by postal questionnaire containing Oxford Knee score, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the EuroQol.

Previous primary outcome measures:
Changes in Oxford Hip and Knee and Iowa Level of Assistance Scores, timed sit-to-stand, EuroQol and resource use diaries.
Secondary outcome measuresAdded as of 02/07/2008:
1. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
2. The timed sit-to-stand test
3. The timed walk test
4. The Leg extensor press
5. Joint range of motion
6. The EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D)
7. Patient diaries to collect heath resource utilisation

Trial patients underwent reassessment, using all outcome measures, at three and twelve months post-operatively by a physiotherapist blind to trial arm allocation. Patients were also followed up at six months post-operatively by postal questionnaire containing Oxford Knee score, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the EuroQol.
Overall study start date20/08/2003
Completion date01/04/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexBoth
Target number of participants107 patients (recruitment phases completed)
Key inclusion criteriaAdded as of 02/07/2008:
Age range and gender was unspecified; all patients undergoing an elective primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and who reside within the community of Oxfordshire were eligible.
Key exclusion criteriaAdded as of 02/07/2008:
1. Patients undergoing bilateral arthroplasty
2. Minimally invasive surgery and metal-to-metal implants
3. Patients where further joint surgery is planned within the next twelve months
4. Patients with inflammatory arthritis
5. Patients whose existing co-morbities prevent them from participating in the proposed treatment intervention
6. Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
Date of first enrolment20/08/2003
Date of final enrolment01/04/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Physiotherapy Research Unit
Oxford
OX3 7LD
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Department of Health
Government

Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Website http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en

Funders

Funder type

Government

Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/07/2012 Yes No