Interactive Video Disk and Patient Treatment Choices for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

ISRCTN ISRCTN10624349
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10624349
Protocol serial number PSI04-01
Sponsor Record Provided by the NHS R&D 'Time-Limited' National Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Funder NHS Primary and Secondary Care Interface National Research and Development Programme (UK)
Submission date
23/01/2004
Registration date
23/01/2004
Last edited
31/10/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Klim McPherson
Scientific

Health Promotion Sciences Unit
London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Keppel Street
London
WC1E 7HT
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7927 2036
Email abc@email.com

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific titleInteractive Video Disk and Patient Treatment Choices for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
Study objectivesThe objective was to determine whether the provision of detailed information about BPH treatment options and outcomes via an interactive video disk affected patient decision making.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedUrological and genital diseases: benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
Intervention1. Video viewing
2. Standard care
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

Providing detailed information about the risks and benefits of treatment via the interactive video did not significantly appear to affect treatment choice. The interactive video was considered acceptable and easy to understand by patients, and despite the lack of a statistically significant difference in treatment choice, we cannot exclude the possibility that important shifts in the decision making process may occur, when a video such as this is introduced into clinical practice.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Completion date01/02/1999

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexMale
Key inclusion criteriaPatients from the Urology Department at Ashford Hospital, Middlesex.
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment01/10/1994
Date of final enrolment01/02/1999

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Health Promotion Sciences Unit
London
WC1E 7HT
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Editorial Notes

31/10/2019: No publications found. All search options exhausted.