An efficacy and mechanism evaluation study of levosimendan for the prevention of acute organ dysfunction in sepsis

ISRCTN ISRCTN12776039
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12776039
EudraCT/CTIS number 2012-005159-18
Secondary identifying numbers 15139
Submission date
18/09/2013
Registration date
19/09/2013
Last edited
11/01/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Signs and Symptoms
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Septic shock is a condition where blood pressure falls in response to overwhelming infection, resulting in poor blood flow to the kidneys and other vital organs and leading to the failure of these organs. It is a life-threatening condition and requires emergency treatment in an intensive care unit. It is the commonest cause for admission to intensive care in the UK and despite improvements in its treatment around 40% of patients die as a result. It is normal practice for intensive care doctors to attempt to restore a patient's blood pressure to a relatively normal level using adrenaline-like drugs called catecholamines which can improve the function of the heart. However, it is increasingly being recognised that these drugs have important side effects and may even be associated with harm. Levosimendan is a new type of drug that improves the function of the heart in a different manner to the adrenaline-like drugs. It has been extensively studied in patients with heart failure and is a licensed drug for this group of patients in many European countries and elsewhere around the world. Around half of patients with septic shock may develop impaired heart function and associated kidney failure, and levosimendan has been shown to improve this. Its use in septicaemia (blood poisoning) has been studied in both animals and humans, and so far the small patient studies have shown promise, but none have been large enough to assess the effect on important patient-centred outcomes. The aim of this study to investigate whether levosimendan benefits patients with septicaemia by reducing the severity of organ failure.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 and over with septicaemia

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to be infused with either levosimendan or a placebo (dummy drug) for 24 hours. Organ failure, kidney injury, heart output, duration of mechanical ventilation, and blood oxygen levels are assessed.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration

Where is the study run from?
ICU Charing Cross Hospital (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
November 2013 to October 2016

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Jonas Lexow
leopards@imperial.ac.uk

Contact information

Mr Jonas Lexow
Scientific

ICU Charing Cross Hospital
Fulham Palace Road
London
W6 8RF
United Kingdom

Email leopards@imperial.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised; Interventional; Design type: Not specified, Treatment
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleAn efficacy and mechanism evaluation study of Levosimendan for the Prevention of Acute oRgan Dysfunction in Sepsis (LeoPARDS)
Study acronymLeoPARDS
Study hypothesisIn this study we plan to undertake a randomised, controlled trial in a number of intensive care units to investigate whether levosimendan, when added to standard care, can produce important benefits for patients with septicaemia by reducing the severity of organ failure.
Ethics approval(s)First Medical Reasearch Ethic Committee (MREC), 26/04/2013; Ref: 13/LO/0365
ConditionTopic: Generic Health Relevance and Cross Cutting Themes; Subtopic: Generic Health Relevance (all Subtopics); Disease: Critical Care
Intervention1. Levosimendan, 0.05 - 0.2 µg/kg/min infusion for 24 hours
2. Matching placebo, infusion for 24 hours
Follow Up Length: 6 month(s); Study Entry : Single Randomisation only
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Levosimendan
Primary outcome measureMean sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score; Timepoint(s): On ICU after randomisation
Secondary outcome measures1. Acute kidney injury; Timepoint(s): Day 14
2. Cardiac output; Timepoint(s): upto 96 hours
3. Duration of mechanical ventilation; Timepoint(s): In ICU
4. Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2); Timepoint(s): upto 96 hours
5. Serum bilirubin; Timepoint(s): In ICU upto day 28
Overall study start date01/11/2013
Overall study end date31/10/2016

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 516; UK Sample Size: 516; Description: Randomised 1:1
Participant inclusion criteria1. The target population includes adult patients (=18 years) who require vasopressor support for the management of sepsis despite fluid resuscitation
2. Inclusion criteria will use the internationally-established consensus definitions of sepsis. In brief, fulfil 2 out of 4 of the criteria of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) due to known or suspected infection within the previous 24 hours. The SIRS criteria are:
2.1. Fever (>38 C) or hypothermia (< 36 C)
2.2. Tachycardia (heart rate > 90 beats per minute)
2.3. Tachypnoea (respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minute or PaCO2 < 4.3 kPa) or need for mechanical ventilation
2.4. Abnormal leukocyte count [> 12,000 cells/mm3, < 4000 cells/mm3, or > 10% immature (band) forms]
3. Hypotension, despite adequate intravenous fluid resuscitation, requiring treatment with a vasopressor infusion (e.g. noradrenaline/adrenaline/vasopressin analogue) for at least four hours and still having an ongoing vasopressor requirement at the time of randomisation.

Target Gender: Male & Female
Participant exclusion criteriaThe exclusion criteria are as follows:
1. More than 24 hours since meeting all the inclusion criteria
2. Endstage renal failure at presentation (previously dialysis-dependent)
3. Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C)
4. A history of Torsades de Pointes
5. Significant mechanical obstructions affecting ventricular filling or outflow or both
6. Treatment limitation decision in place [e.g. Do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) or not for ventilation/dialysis]
7. Known or estimated weight of more than135kg
8. Known to be pregnant
9. Previous treatment with levosimendan within 30 days
10. Known hypersensitivity to levosimendan or any of the excipients
11. Known to have received another investigational medicinal product within 30 days or currently in another interventional trial that might interact with the study drug.
Recruitment start date01/11/2013
Recruitment end date31/10/2016

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

ICU Charing Cross Hospital
London
W6 8RF
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine (UK)
University/education

International Centre for Circulatory Health
Exhibition Rd
London
SW7 2AZ
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/041kmwe10

Funders

Funder type

Government

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK); Grant Codes: 11/14/08
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Research, NIHRresearch, NIHR - National Institute for Health Research, NIHR (The National Institute for Health and Care Research), NIHR
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 02/06/2014 Yes No
Results article results 27/10/2016 Yes No
Results article results 01/11/2018 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

11/01/2019: Publication references added.
17/06/2016: Plain English summary added.