Efficacy and safety of using insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic therapy failing to achieve control of blood sugar: the Toujeo-1 trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN12809144
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12809144
Secondary identifying numbers GLARGL07589
Submission date
24/06/2019
Registration date
25/06/2019
Last edited
04/07/2024
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
People with type 2 diabetes usually start their diabetes treatment with life style modifications and oral antidiabetic drugs. However, type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease and therefore, in many cases also insulin supply is needed. An often used way to start with insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes is to add one shot of basal insulin per day to the oral antidiabetic drugs used. To take insulin goes hand in hand with hypoglycemia, an unwanted state of too low blood sugar with several symptoms, sometimes even including fainting and coma. Therefore, fear of hypoglycemia often prevents people with diabetes to achieve their blood sugar targets. On the other hand it is very important for patients with diabetes to reach their blood sugar targets to avoid late-stage complications like kidney disease, eye disorders and cardiovascular diseases. Several newer types of insulins have been developed, which reduce the risk for hypoglycemia compared to older types of insulin. The aim of this study is to find out, if starting insulin therapy with insulin glargine 300 units per milliliter, a newer basal insulin, allows more people with type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs, who did not reach their target blood sugar levels, to achieve their blood sugar targets safely, i.e. with low risk for hypoglycaemia, in daily clinical practice.

Who can participate?
Adults at or over the age of 18 years with type 2 diabetes who use oral antidiabetic drugs and are treated by a German or Swiss physician.

What does the study involve?
Participants are elected by their treating physician to join this study, if the physician had already decided to start a basal insulin therapy with insulin glargine 300 units per milliliter independent of the participation in this study. Participants will be treated by their physician as usual and will visit their doctor in the usual time intervals (in Germany and Switzerland usually every three months for diabetes patients). The physician will document several parameters at the first visit, when the basal insulin is started, and at least 6 and 12 months thereafter. The study lasts one year in total. The participants are asked to answer a diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire at the first visit and at the visit 12 months thereafter.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There will be no immediate direct benefit or risk to those taking part, because this is a non-interventional study which means that patients are treated as they would be without participation in this study. However, the results of this study will add to the knowledge of how insulin glargine 300 units per milliliter is used in daily clinical practice and how its use in combination with oral antidiabetic drugs can be improved.

Where is the study run from?
The Toujeo-1 study is being run by Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH and takes place in diabetologists’ and general practioners’, family physicians’ and internists’ practices all over Germany and Switzerland, where people with type 2 diabetes are treated.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July 2015 to December 2017

Who is funding the study?
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH (Germany)

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Dr. Martin Pfohl, chief physician of Medical Clinic I, General Internal Medicine, Ev. Krankenhaus BETHESDA, Heerstr. 219, D-47053 Duisburg, Germany, email: medklinik1@bethesda.de

Contact information

Dr Katrin Pegelow
Scientific

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Potsdamer Str. 8
Berlin
D-10785
Germany

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-9002-5305
Phone +49 (0)30 2575 2920
Email Katrin.Pegelow@sanofi.com
Prof Martin Pfohl
Scientific

Ev. Krankenhaus BETHESDA
Heerstr. 219
Duisburg
D-47053
Germany

Phone +49(0)203 6008-0
Email medklinik1@bethesda.de

Study information

Study designNon-interventional open-label multi-center multi-national single-arm prospective observational study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designLongitudinal study
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet.
Scientific titleA prospective observational study assessing the clinical benefit of Toujeo initiation after oral antidiabetic drug failure in insulin naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Study acronymToujeo-1
Study hypothesisThe aim of this non-interventional study (NIS) was to document the treatment effectiveness and safety after 6 and 12 months for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who started a basal Insulin supported oral therapy (BOT) with insulin glargine 300 U/mL used under real-life conditions in daily clinical practice.
Ethics approval(s)1. Approved 02/06/2015, Ethikkommission der Ärztekammer Nordrhein / Ethical committee of the state medical council of Northrhine (Tersteegenstr. 9, D-40474 Düsseldorf, Germany; +49-211-4302-2272; Ethik@aekno.de), ref: 2015162
2. Approved 18/01/2016, Commission cantonale d'éthique de la recherche sur l'etre humain / Cantonal ethical committee for the research in humans (Canton de Vaud, Av. de Chailly 23, 1012 Lausanne, Switzerland; +41-21-316 18 30; secretariat.CER@vd.ch), ref: 464/15
ConditionType 2 diabetes mellitus in adult patients requiring basal insulin therapy.
InterventionAll data were collected three times during this study: at baseline, approximately 6 and approximately 12 months after starting insulin glargine 300 U/mL therapy. Baseline documentation had to start immediately after adding insulin glargine 300 U/mL to the existing OAD therapy. This had to occur after the physician had independently of the participation in this study decided to prescribe insulin glargine 300 U/mL and when thereafter the physician and the patient had decided the participation of the latter in this study. Next measurements were documented approximately 6 months thereafter and last measurements were documented approximately 12 months thereafter. Besides this, all fasting blood glucose (FBG) measurements available were collected on a monthly base asking for documentation of changes during the last four weeks each month. Also, dosing information was captured every month; i.e. actual dose and frequency of dose changes during the last four weeks. Data had to be generated during daily therapeutic routine of the physicians. Any change in the patient’s antidiabetic therapy regimen was strictly left at the physician’s discretion. No therapeutic decision of the physician should have been based upon participation in this study. Titration algorithm was also left at investigator’s discretion. Participating physicians were distributed equally all over Germany and Switzerland to allow for a representative sample of German and Swiss patients with T2DM initiating basal insulin therapy as add-on to their oral antidiabetic treatment.
In order to allow for a valid statistical analysis even in smaller subgroups of patients (as distribution within the predefined subgroups may not be equal) it was originally planned to document and analyze about 3,500 patients in this NIS (3,000 patients from Germany and 250 from Austria and Switzerland, each). The planned number of participating sites was 790. However, the study could not be conducted in Austria due to restrictions in re-imbursement of basal insulin analogs. Therefore, numbers reduced to 3,250 planned patients in about 770 sites.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Insulin glargine
Primary outcome measureHbA1c response rate during month 1-6 and month 1-12 after start of insulin glargine 300 U/mL treatment, respectively; Response being defined as achieving at least one HbA1c value below the predefined individual target value within the respective observational period. Response rates were summarized with frequency distribution and, in addition, adjusted frequency distribution considering only patients with non-missing data. Exact 95% confidence intervals (CI) according to Clopper-Pearson were calculated.
Secondary outcome measures1. Absolute change in HbA1c from baseline to 6 to 12 months
2. Absolute change in FBG from baseline to 6 to 12 months
3. Response rate 6 and 12 months after start of insulin glargine 300 U/mL treatment defined by
3.1 reaching two FBG values ≤110 mg/dL (≤6.1 mmol/L) or at least once the predefined individual HbA1c target value
3.2 reaching two FBG values ≤110 mg/dL (≤6.1 mmol/L)
3.3 reaching two FBG values ≤110 mg/dL (≤6.1 mmol/L) and at least once the predefined individual HbA1c target value
4. Time from start of insulin glargine 300 U/mL treatment to response for each of the response endpoints (see definitions above, including primary efficacy parameter) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Reaching a response criterion for the first time was considered as event in these analyses. Response in FBG required at least two values ≤110 mg/dL (≤6.1 mmol/L) whereas start of response was defined at the first occurrence. Patients without response were censored at the date of last measurement of FBG or HbA1c, respectively. Median time to response and corresponding 95% CI were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, cumulative incidence curves were
produced.
5. Duration (persistence) of response for each of the response endpoints (see definitions above, including primary efficacy parameter) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Only patients with documented response and valid duration time (not missing, not negative) were included in these analyses. End of response was defined as one of the following (depending on endpoint definition):
5.1 the second FBG value >110 mg/dL (>6.1 mmol/L) after start of FBG response
5.2 the first HbA1c value above the predefined individual target
5.3 change to another form of insulin therapy or change of basal insulin
Patients without documented end of response were censored at the date of last measurement of FBG or HbA1c, respectively. Median duration of response and corresponding 95% CI were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition,
Kaplan-Meier curves were produced.
6. Incidences and event rates per patient year were calculated for symptomatic, confirmed symptomatic, nocturnal, severe, and severe nocturnal hypoglycemia as reported in the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF). Confirmation of symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as self-measured blood glucose (SMBG) measurement ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L). Severe hypoglycemia was defined as necessity of the assistance of another person or a SMBG measurement of ≤56 mg/dL (≤3.1 mmol/L). Nocturnal hypoglycemia was defined as hypoglycemia occurring during the night (approximately 10pm-6am), while the patient was asleep (symptomatic or confirmed by SMBG measurement ≤70 mg/dL [≤3.9 mmol/L]). Severe nocturnal hypoglycemia was defined as those nocturnal hypoglycemia fulfilling the definition of a severe hypoglycemia. 95% CIs for incidence rates were calculated according to Clopper-Pearson. Rates per patient year were calculated as cumulative number of hypoglycemic events for all patients divided by the cumulative duration of insulin glargine 300 U/mL therapy in years, whereas patients with missing treatment duration or missing number of hypoglycemic events were excluded. Details for calculation are provided in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP).
7. Absolute change in the 4-point blood glucose profile
8. Absolute change in body weight
9. Absolute change in daily insulin doses (number of units and number of units per kg body weight [BW]) and number of dose modifications per visits
10. Values and absolute changes for blood lipids (triglycerides, high-density Lipoprotein [HDL], low-density Lipoprotein [LDL] and total cholesterol)
11. Type of LLT overall and by LDL subgroups (<70 mg/dL, <100 mg/dL, 100-190 mg/dL, >190 mg/dL at respective visit). An intensification of LLT was defined as administration of an additional LLT drug compared to baseline, or a higher dosing of statin, i.e. change from moderate at one visit to intensive at a following visit.
Overall study start date30/10/2014
Overall study end date21/12/2017

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants3250
Total final enrolment1748
Participant inclusion criteria1. Patients with type 2 diabetes (oral antidiabetic drugs).
2. Adults and Seniors: Age at least 18 years, no upper age limit.
3. HbA1c between 7.5% to 10.0%.
4. Ability and willingness to perform blood glucose self-monitoring.
Participant exclusion criteria1. Type 1 diabetes.
2. Contraindications for a therapy with insulin glargine 300 U/mL.
3. Any kind of existing insulin therapy.
4. Patients with known cancer disease.
5. Pregnancy.
6. Drug or alcohol abuse.
7. Dementia or general incapacity to understand the content of the observational study.
Recruitment start date12/06/2015
Recruitment end date31/12/2016

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Germany
  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

Prof. Dr. Martin Pfohl - Ev. Krankenhaus BETHESDA
Heerstr. 219
Duisburg
D-47053
Germany

Sponsor information

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Industry

Potsdamer Str. 8
Berlin
D-10785
Germany

Phone +49 (0)30 2575 2502
Email Cornelia.Dorn@sanofi.com
Website https://www.sanofi.de/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03ytdtb31

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date26/06/2019
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planFull publications planned in high-impact peer-reviewed journals:
1 full publication planned for Q3/2019.
2 full paper on sub group analyses (age groups, responder) are planned for beginning of 2020.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Abstract results conference abstract 04/05/2016 No No
Abstract results conference abstract 26/04/2018 No No
Abstract results conference abstract 01/05/2018 No No
Results article results 01/05/2020 02/04/2020 Yes No
Protocol file version 2.0 21/04/2015 27/09/2022 No No
Results article 03/07/2020 04/07/2024 Yes No

Additional files

ISRCTN12809144 Protocol v2.0 21Apr2015.pdf

Editorial Notes

04/07/2024: Publication reference added.
27/09/2022: Uploaded protocol (not peer-reviewed) as an additional file.
09/08/2022: Internal review.
02/04/2020: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The total final enrolment was added.
25/06/2019: Trial’s existence confirmed by Ärztekammer Nordrhein and Commission cantonale d'éthique de la recherche sur l'etre humain.