Does expansion of the upper jaw in cases of posterior crossbite affect the position of the temporomandibular joint and the occlusion of the teeth?
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN14042137 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14042137 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT) | Nil known |
| Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) | Nil known |
| Protocol serial number | 5414 |
| Sponsor | Damascus University |
| Funder | Damascus University |
- Submission date
- 01/10/2024
- Registration date
- 04/10/2024
- Last edited
- 03/12/2024
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Oral Health
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
This study aims to compare two different dental devices, the quad-helix and removable expansion plates, to see which is more effective in treating a condition called unilateral posterior crossbite in children. This condition involves a misalignment of the teeth and jaw, causing difficulties in biting and chewing.
Who can participate?
The study includes 40 children aged between 7 and 10 years who have a unilateral posterior crossbite with a shift in their lower jaw.
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group uses the quad-helix device, while the other uses removable expansion plates. Impressions of their teeth are taken at four different times: before treatment starts, after the active treatment phase, after a three-month stabilization phase, and after a six-month monitoring phase.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The potential benefit of participating is the correction of the crossbite, which can improve dental function and appearance. Risks might include discomfort from wearing the devices and the usual risks associated with dental treatments.
Where is the study run from?
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University (Syria)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study started on February 20, 2022, and is expected to run until December 10, 2024.
Who is funding the study?
Damascus University (Syria)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Aynawi, m.aynawi93@gmail.com
Contact information
Public, Scientific, Principal investigator
Department of Orthodontics
Faculty of Dentistry
Damascus University
Al-Mazzeh St.
Damascus
0004
Syria
| Phone | +963 (0)930 899 344 |
|---|---|
| Mohammad93.aynawi@damascusuniversity.edu.sy |
Scientific
Department of Orthodontics
Faculty of Dentistry
Damascus University
Al-Mazzeh St.
Damascus
0004
Syria
| 0000-0002-0727-2653 | |
| Phone | +963 (0)944302075 |
| Prof.ahmadbourhan@damascusuniversity.edu.sy |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Randomized controlled clinical trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Efficacy of the removable expansion plate and the quad-helix in correcting unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
| Study objectives | 1. There is no difference in the effectiveness of the quad-helix appliance and the removable expansion plate in terms of changes in dental alveolar widths 2. There is no difference in the effectiveness of the quad-helix device and the removable expansion plate in the amount of correction of the deviation of the lower dental and mandibular midline |
| Ethics approval(s) | Ethics approval not required |
| Ethics approval additional information | No ethics approval is required because the devices used have been previously tested on humans. |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Malocclusion, narrow upper jaw |
| Intervention | Participants were randomly divided into two groups using a simple computer randomization method at a 1:1 allocation ratio. The patients in the first group were expanded using quad-helix, and the second group was expanded using removable expansion plates. Impressions were taken at the following evaluation times: (T0): before the expansion begins, (T1): after the end of the active treatment phase, (T2): after the end of the stabilization phase, which lasts 3 months, (T3): after completing the monitoring phase, which lasts 6 months, starting from after the end of the stabilization phase. |
| Intervention type | Device |
| Phase | Not Applicable |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | Quad-helix or removable expansion device |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
1. Maxillary intermolar distance is measured using a digital caliper at T0, T1, T2, and T3 |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Pain is measured using the visual analogue score (VAS) at baseline, 24 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month |
| Completion date | 10/12/2024 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Child |
| Lower age limit | 7 Years |
| Upper age limit | 10 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 40 |
| Total final enrolment | 37 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Patients with mixed occlusion, aged 7-10 years 2. The presence of a functional unilateral posterior crossbite (associated with lateral slippage) 3. Symmetrical maxillary arch narrowing or symmetrical skeletal narrowing (assessed clinically and then radiographically) 4. The maxillary first molars are erupted and in good condition, with full eruption of the upper and lower molars (at a minimum) 5. Dental and skeletal relationships of the first, light second, or light third category (meaning that the angle ANB falls between 1-5), protrusion between 0.5 to 4 mm, coverage between 0.5 to 4 mm 6. A normal or mild vertical growth model such that the Bjork sum is between 390-406, the Y axis is between 62-72 degrees, and the angle between SN and GoMe is 26-42 degrees 7. There are no general problems, the patient has good oral health, and has not undergone previous orthodontic treatments |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. The presence of periodontal diseases, general diseases, syndromes (cleft lip and palate) or systemic diseases that affect growth 2. Patients who have undergone previous orthodontic treatment 3. If the structural relationship is of the second or third category, moderate or severe 4. Patients with anterior crossbites as well as posterior crossbites 5. Patients with anterior open bites as well as posterior crossbites 6. Patients whose functional posterior crossbites are characterized by anterolateral slippage 7. Patients whose chin deviation on closure is of common structural and functional origin 8. Patients in whom the path of mouth opening from the rest position to the maximum possible position is tortuous or disturbed |
| Date of first enrolment | 20/04/2022 |
| Date of final enrolment | 10/04/2024 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Syria
Study participating centre
Department of Orthodontics
Al-Mazzeh St.
Damascus
80789
Syria
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Data sharing statement to be made available at a later date |
| IPD sharing plan | The data-sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
Editorial Notes
03/12/2024: Internal review.
01/10/2024: Study's existence confirmed by Damascus University.