Evaluation of autoSCORE: an artificial intelligence based algorithm for EEG classification versus human experts

ISRCTN ISRCTN14307038
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14307038
Secondary identifying numbers 24084-01
Submission date
18/03/2022
Registration date
25/03/2022
Last edited
05/09/2023
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nervous System Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Electroencephalography (EEG) measures electric brain activity using electrodes attached to the scalp. This is used to investigate brain disease, most commonly epilepsy, coma, and dementia. The clinical interpretation of EEGs is until now mainly based on expert visual analysis, and there are indications that EEG reviewers are under increasing time pressure. A large, anonymized dataset consisting of EEGs evaluated and annotated by experts with a dedicated software package (SCORE EEG) is used to train an algorithm (autoSCORE) to automatically assess EEGs. autoSCORE is trained to separate normal from abnormal EEGs. When autoSCORE assesses the EEG as abnormal it will further sub-classify abnormalities into four sub-groups, which provide important information for medical decisions on patient management. This is a human expert validation study to validate the algorithm.

Who can participate?
This study involves analysis of recorded electroencephalography data. Direct participation of new patients is not required.

What does the study involve?
Doctors will assess 100 EEGs and the algorithm will assess the same EEGs. A large independent EEG dataset from Oslo University Hospital will be used to compare autoSCORE with the clinical scorings of the experts who evaluated the EEGs. The goal is to prove that the autoSCORE algorithm is non-inferior to human experts. The researchers will compare autoSCORE with a commercially available EEG analysis software package (ENCEVIS).

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
As the study involves analysis of the EEG data of patients who were referred to the investigation as part of their diagnostic work-up, there are no additional risks for the patients. EEG is a non-invasive procedure without any risks. The benefits are EEG diagnostics will become available also in underserved areas where EEG experts are not available, and it will assist physicians in reducing their workload in places where the expertise is available.

Where is the study run from?
1. Danish Epilepsy Centre Filadelfia (Denmark)
2. Haukeland University Hospital (Norway)
3. Oslo University Hospital (Norway)
4. Mayo Clinic (USA)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
June 2020 to March 2022

Who is funding the study?
Holberg EEG (Norway)

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Sandor Beniczky
sbz@filadelfia.dk

Contact information

Prof Sandor Beniczky
Principal Investigator

Visby Allé 5
Dianalund
4293
Denmark

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-6035-6581
Phone +45 (0)26981536
Email sbz@filadelfia.dk

Study information

Study designCross-sectional validation study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCross sectional study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Scientific titleAccuracy of EEG classification by autoSCORE algorithm compared with human experts
Study acronymautoSCORE
Study hypothesisThe autoSCORE algorithm has an accuracy similar to human experts in distinguishing abnormal from normal electroencephalography (EEG) recordings and classifying the abnormal recordings: focal-epileptiform, generalized-epileptiform, focal-slowing, diffuse-slowing.

AutoSCORE is an algorithm developed using artificial intelligence, based on a large SCORE dataset. The validation process is prospective, i.e. after the development of the algorithm, using a fixed algorithm and threshold (cut-off) value.
Ethics approval(s)This study uses anonymized EEG datasets and does not require ethics approval. The study has been reviewed on 07/07/2020 by the institutional review board and the data safety officer at the institution of the Principal Investigator, the Danish Epilepsy Centre, Filadelfia (Kolonivej 1, 4293, Dianalund, Denmark; +45 (0)58264200; pwo@filadelfia.dk), ref: Sagsnr. 0100256
ConditionPatients suspected of epilepsy or other conditions with impaired consciousness or cognition
InterventionEEGs will be automatically assessed by the previously developed autoSCORE algorithm using pre-defined detection thresholds. The algorithm first distinguishes between normal and abnormal recordings. Then, it classifies the abnormal EEGs into four categories: focal-epileptiform, generalized-epileptiform, focal-slowing, diffuse-slowing.

The performance of autoSCORE will be compared with the evaluation of the EEGs by a panel of experts on an independent dataset of a balanced sample of 100 randomly selected EEGs and form a large independent dataset from a hospital that did not participate in the development of the algorithm.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureSensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of autoSCORE compared with the majority-consensus scoring of the human experts, calculated using a balanced sample of 100 randomly selected EEGs at a single timepoint
Secondary outcome measuresCalculated using a balanced sample of 100 randomly selected EEGs at a single timepoint:
1. Inter-test agreement (autoSCORE vs human experts) in the large, independent dataset
2. Performance of autoSCORE at identifying recordings with epileptiform abnormalities (both focal and generalized) compared with the commercially available spike-detector software packages
Overall study start date01/06/2020
Overall study end date18/03/2022

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupMixed
SexBoth
Target number of participants100
Total final enrolment100
Participant inclusion criteriaThe EEGs to be selected for this study have not been part of the training dataset to develop the autoSCORE. The datasets are distributed between the EEGs arriving from Haukeland University Hospital, Danish Epilepsy Centre Filadelfia and Mayo Clinic. Although there is no scientific reason to consider that ethnicities or geographical origin of the EEG, nor the software used for acquisition influences the results, in order to avoid any such potential bias, the study design has addressed this by using EEGs from different geographies. Age range: 35% under 16 years (pediatric population), 65% over 16 years (adult population).
Participant exclusion criteria1. Neonatal
2. EEGs reported with rhythmic and periodic patterns in critically ill patients
Recruitment start date01/06/2021
Recruitment end date18/03/2022

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Denmark
  • Norway
  • United States of America

Study participating centres

Danish Epilepsy Centre Filadelfia
Kolonivej 1
Dianalund
4293
Denmark
Haukeland University Hospital
Haukelandsveien 22
Bergen
5009
Norway
Mayo Clinic, Florida
4500 San Pablo Rd S
Jacksonville
FL 32224
United States of America

Sponsor information

Holberg EEG AS
Industry

Fjøsangerveien 70 A
Bergen
5068
Norway

Phone +47 (0)926 44 261
Email shelley.cam@holbergeeg.com
Website https://www.holbergeeg.com/

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Holberg EEG AS

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date09/09/2023
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planAdditional information, including raw data, is available on request, pending IRB approval for the intended use. Please contact Prof. Sandor Beniczky (sbz@filadelfia.dk). Type of data: anonymised EEG, diagnostic gold standard; demographics (age, gender), output of the algorithm. Data will be available upon request for 10 years from the publication for scientific non-commercial use. As the dataset is de-identified, there is no need for consent from the participants.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol file version 4 28/02/2022 24/03/2022 No No
Results article 01/08/2023 05/09/2023 Yes No

Additional files

41383_PROTOCOL_28Feb22_V4.pdf

Editorial Notes

05/09/2023: Publication reference added.
06/04/2023: The intention to publish date was changed from 01/06/2023 to 09/09/2023.
04/01/2023: The intention to publish date was changed from 01/01/2023 to 01/06/2023.
02/09/2022: The intention to publish date was changed from 01/09/2022 to 01/01/2023.
24/03/2022: Trial's existence confirmed by the Danish Epilepsy Centre.