Submission date
22/11/2017
Registration date
01/12/2017
Last edited
17/08/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Retrospectively registered
Protocol added
? SAP not yet added
Results added
? Raw data not yet added
Study completed

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods (RUTF) are high-energy, lipid-based spreads that can be used for the treatment of malnutrition. To provide government and international agencies with an alternative to the standard treatment, this study aims to compare an alternative ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) with the standard RUTF.

Who can participate?
Ghanaian children aged 6-59 months with moderate or severe acute malnutrition at rural health clinics throughout the Brong Ahafo region

What does the study involve?
Participating children are randomly allocated to one of two groups. One group receives the standard formula RUTF and the other group receives an alternative formula RUTF with locally sourced ingredients. Enough food for two weeks’ feeding is given to the child’s caretaker with instructions on daily feeding methods and they are advised not to share the food product with other members of the household. Children and caretakers return for follow-up, food collection, measurements, and monitoring of the child’s growth and any side effects every 2 weeks until recovery or failure (death, transfer to hospital for inpatient care, remaining malnourished at 12 weeks). At follow-up, caretakers are questioned about symptoms of acute illness, compliance with study foods and food intolerance or allergy. If needed an additional 2 weeks of therapeutic foods is dispensed. If the child is judged to have altered mental status, respiratory (breathing) distress or an acute clinical illness needing medical care, the child is referred to the health center for complicated malnutrition and withdrawn from the study.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
In this region of Ghana there are no alternatives and no home-based treatments for moderate or severe acute malnutrition. There is no cost to the participants, and the study provides all medicines, tests and medical care related to the treatment of acute malnutrition for free to the participants. The child has enough study food provided at home for the recovery of acute malnutrition and is monitored regularly during recovery. This may result in fewer complications (diarrhoea, respiratory illnesses) as the child recovers. Medical treatments that are needed are provided during these follow-up visits. Additionally, other malnourished children may benefit because this study aims to learn if both of these foods promote full nutritional recovery from acute malnutrition. If both foods are equivalent this could mean that more children could have access to treatment as the alternative RUTF is lower in cost. There are certain risks and discomforts that may be associated with this study. They are rare but may include rashes, itching or cough as a result of food allergies to the food. If a child develops any of these problems, caregivers are advised to stop feeding him/her the food and return to the health center to have him/her examined by one of the study doctors.

Where is the study run from?
Health Clinics in Brong Ahafo region of Ghana

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
May 2016 to April 2018

Who is funding the study?
Children's Investment Fund Foundation (UK)

Who is the main contact?
1. Dr Mark Manary
2. Mrs Meghan Callaghan-Gillespie

Study website

Contact information

Type

Public

Contact name

Dr Mark Manary

ORCID ID

Contact details

660 S. Euclid Ave
Campus Box 8116
St. Louis
63110
United States of America

Type

Public

Contact name

Mrs Meghan Callaghan-Gillespie

ORCID ID

Contact details

660 S. Euclid Ave
Campus Box 8116
St. Louis
63110
United States of America

Additional identifiers

EudraCT/CTIS number

IRAS number

ClinicalTrials.gov number

Protocol/serial number

201604032

Study information

Scientific title

Comparison of a locally produced, alternative therapeutic food to a standard ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) for the treatment of acute malnutrition in children from the Brong Ahafo region of Ghana

Acronym

Study hypothesis

The difference in recovery rates between the locally produced alternative RUTF and standard RUTF will be no greater than 5 percent.

Ethics approval(s)

1. The Washington University in St. Louis Institutional Review Board, original approval 04/05/2016, continuing review approval 27/04/2017, ref: IRB ID #:201604032
2. Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research Institutional Review Board, original approval 02/03/2016, continuing review approval 04/05/2017, ref: CPN 078/15-16

Study design

Randomised double-blinded controlled clinical equivalency trial

Primary study design

Interventional

Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Study setting(s)

Home

Study type

Treatment

Patient information sheet

Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet

Condition

Acute malnutrition as defined by weight for height z-score (WHZ) < -2, Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) <12.5 cm, or bipedal edema

Intervention

Randomisation consists of random 1:1 permuted blocks of 4 for the entire study rather than at each study site. Within the randomised blocks two colors were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 2 colors to the control group. To allocate children to a food group, caretakers chose a sealed envelope that contained 1 of 4 colors (permuted randomised blocks). The color will be recorded separately from the child’s clinical measurements and researchers involved in the randomisation process do not know which color corresponds to which food. The drivers who distribute the food will not assess the participant.

Control: ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) - standard formula
Intervention: ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) - alternative formula with locally sourced ingredients

The randomized therapeutic food sufficient for two weeks’ feeding will be given to the enrolled subject’s caretaker with instructions on daily feeding methods and advised not to share the food product with other members of the household. Subjects and caretakers will return for follow-up, food collection, measurements, and monitoring of the child’s growth and any adverse events every two weeks until recovery (WHZ ≥ -2 and MUAC≥ 12.5 by 12 weeks) or failure (death, transfer to hospital for inpatient care, remaining malnourished at 12 weeks, default). Children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) will initially be given oral amoxicillin twice daily for a week. For eligible children with no bipedal edema, a MUAC > 11.5 cm and/or WHZ > -3 the child will receive 75 kcal/kg/day of RUTF, for eligible children with bipedal edema or a MUAC < 11.5 or WHZ < -3 the child will receive 190 kcal/kg/day. Once children with SAM achieve MUAC >11.5 cm, the RUTF dose will be reduced.

At follow-up, caretakers of children will be questioned about symptoms of acute illness, compliance with study foods and food intolerance or allergy. If edema persists or MUAC is less than 12.5 cm, an additional two weeks of therapeutic foods will be dispensed. If the child is judged to have altered mental status, respiratory distress or an acute clinical illness needing medical care, the child will be referred to the health center for complicated SAM and withdrawn from the study.

Children will also be evaluated for kwashiorkor by assessing for bilateral pitting edema. No additional food rations will be distributed when subjects reach an outcome: recovery (MUAC ≥ 12.5), death, development of complicated severe acute malnutrition, transfer to hospital for inpatient care, failure to recover from by 12 weeks, or default.

Intervention type

Supplement

Primary outcome measure

1. Mid-upper arm circumference, measured with a standard insertion tape to the nearest 0.1 cm every two weeks until recovery
2. Weight for length z-score (weight measured using an electronic scale to the nearest 5 g, length measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a rigid length board), measured every two weeks until recovery

Secondary outcome measures

1. Other anthropometric measures (weight measured using an electronic scale to the nearest 5 g, length measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a rigid length board), measured every two weeks until recovery
2. Adverse symptoms, such as stomach pain, vomiting, diarrhea, rash or fever, measured every two weeks until recovery

Overall study start date

01/05/2016

Overall study end date

01/04/2018

Reason abandoned (if study stopped)

Eligibility

Participant inclusion criteria

Children aged 6-59 months with WHZ < -2, MUAC <12.5 cm, or bipedal edema

Participant type(s)

Other

Age group

Child

Lower age limit

6 Months

Upper age limit

59 Months

Sex

Both

Target number of participants

1800

Total final enrolment

1270

Participant exclusion criteria

1. Children currently involved in another research trial or feeding program
2. Developmentally delayed
3. Chronic debilitating illness (such as cerebral palsy)
4. History of peanut or milk allergy
5. Serious adverse effects to the study food (such as an allergic reaction)
6. Received therapy for acute malnutrition within one month prior to presentation

Recruitment start date

07/02/2017

Recruitment end date

31/08/2018

Locations

Countries of recruitment

Ghana

Study participating centre

Health Clinics in Brong Ahafo region of Ghana
03520
Ghana

Sponsor information

Organisation

Washington University School of Medicine

Sponsor details

660 S. Euclid Ave
St. Louis
63110
United States of America

Sponsor type

University/education

Website

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Funder name

Children's Investment Fund Foundation

Alternative name(s)

CIFF

Funding Body Type

private sector organisation

Funding Body Subtype

Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)

Location

United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

While no documents are currently available via a public forum, the trialists are willing to share the study protocol on request. Planned publication of the study results in a high-impact peer reviewed journal within 6 months to 1 year of the overall trial end date.

Intention to publish date

31/10/2019

Individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan

While the trialists have no plans to share individual deidentified participant data at this time in a public forum, they will be sharing the individual participant data that underlie the results reported in their publication for researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and are willing to sign a data access agreement. Those inquiring to use participant level data for further investigation can submit proposals via email to Dr Mark Manary.

IPD sharing plan summary

Available on request

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Basic results 18/04/2019 18/04/2019 No No
Results article results 27/06/2019 03/04/2020 Yes No
Protocol file 17/08/2022 No No

Editorial Notes

17/08/2022: Uploaded protocol (not peer-reviewed) as an additional file. 03/04/2020: Publication reference added. 18/04/2019: The following changes were made to the trial record: 1. The basic results of this trial have been uploaded as an additional file. 2. The total final enrolment was added. 15/03/2018: The following changes have been made: 1. The recruitment end date has been changed from 05/02/2018 to 31/08/2018. 2. The overall trial end date has been changed from 01/04/2018 to 30/11/2018. 3. The intention to publish date has been changed from 01/04/2019 to 31/10/2019.