A study to compare the efficacy of intra-articular injection of methylprednisolone versus triamcinolone hexacetonide in patients with knee osteoarthritis

ISRCTN ISRCTN15077843
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15077843
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
16/09/2013
Registration date
25/09/2013
Last edited
10/06/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Steroids can be used in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis (arthritis of the knee), but the best agent is still unknown. This study aimed to compare the effect of two drugs (triamcinolone hexacetonide and methylprednisolone acetonide) on the condition.

Who can participate?
Men and women who are at least 40 years old, with painful knee osteoarthritis took part in this study.

What does the study involve?
Participants were randomly allocated to receive a single knee injection of either triamcinolone hexacetonide or methylprednsilone acetonide. After 24 weeks participants attended a follow-up visit to assess the effectiveness of the treatment with questionnaires.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Possible benefits were pain relief and physical function improvement. Risks were related to the injection and included pain, swelling, bleeding and infection in the knee.

Where is the study run from?
The study was run from Hospital Heliópolis, São Paulo, Brazil

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study started in December 2010 and ended in May 2013

Who is funding the study?
The investigators funded the study

Who is the main contact?
Dr Andrea Lomonte
avannucci@bol.com.br

Contact information

Dr Andrea Lomonte
Scientific

Rua Maria Bucalem Haddad
123, ap 52, bloco B - Vila Firmiano Pinto
Sao Paulo
04125-010
Brazil

Study information

Study design24 weeks prospective randomized two arms double-blinded study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of intra-articular injection of methylprednisolone versus triamcinolone hexacetonide in patients with knee osteoarthritis
Study hypothesisIntra-articular injections of methylprednisolone acetate and triamcinolone hexacetonide have similar efficacy at reducing knee pain and improving physical function both in the short as in the long-term in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.
Ethics approval(s)Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Heliopolis [Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa do Hospital Heliópolis], 14/10/2008
ConditionKnee osteoarthritis
Intervention1. Intra-articular triamcinolone hexacetonide 40mg single dose
2. Intra-articular methylprednisolone acetate 40mg single dose

Total duration of the study: 24 weeks
Intervention was one day (single injection)
Follow-up: 24 weeks
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Methylprednisolone, triamcinolone hexacetonide
Primary outcome measureMean change from baseline in patient’s assessment of pain in the targeted knee by VAS at week 4
Secondary outcome measures1. Mean changes from baseline in patient’s assessment of pain by VAS at 12 and 24 weeks
2. Mean changes from baseline in patient’s and physician’s global assessment of disease activity by VAS
3. Improvement in patient’s global assessment of disease by Likert scale
4. Mean changes from baseline in total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) questionnaire and its subscores of pain, stiffness and physical function
5. Mean changes from baseline in total Lequesne algofunctional index
6. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) response criteria
7. Analysis of predictors of response

All secondary outcomes were measured at 4, 12 and 24 weeks.
Overall study start date18/12/2010
Overall study end date17/05/2013

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants100
Participant inclusion criteria1. Diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA) according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria
2. Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grade II or III of the knee
3. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for knee pain of at least 40mm (maximum 100mm)
4. Both genders, aged 40 years or older
5. Failure to control OA symptoms with previous or current analgesics and/ or non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs
Participant exclusion criteria1. Other rheumatic or inflammatory condition
2. Symptomatic disease of the lower limbs (other than knee OA)
3. Serious and/or uncontrolled concomitant medical illness
4. Body mass index (BMI) greater or equal to 35kg/m2
5. IA injection of corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid in the previous 6 months
6. knee replacement in the targeted joint
7. Local or systemic infection
8. Pregnancy
9. Skin lesions in the IA injection site
10. Physical therapy for the knee
11. Known hypersensitivity to corticosteroids or lidocaine; and the use of anticoagulants
Recruitment start date18/12/2010
Recruitment end date17/05/2013

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Brazil

Study participating centre

Rua Maria Bucalem Haddad
Sao Paulo
04125-010
Brazil

Sponsor information

Hospital Heliópolis (Brazil)
Hospital/treatment centre

Rua Cônego Xavier
276 - Sacomã
Sao Paulo
04231-902
Brazil

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01bkdwe73

Funders

Funder type

Other

Investigator initiated and funded (Brazil)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/09/2015 Yes No

Editorial Notes

10/06/2016: Publication reference added.