Comparison of intensive and standard case management programmes for psychotic patients
ISRCTN | ISRCTN15904286 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15904286 |
Secondary identifying numbers | NMH10C GE179D |
- Submission date
- 23/01/2004
- Registration date
- 23/01/2004
- Last edited
- 20/11/2009
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Prof Francis Creed
Scientific
Scientific
Department of Psychiatry
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)161 276 5331 |
---|---|
Francis.Creed@man.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Other |
Study type | Other |
Scientific title | |
Study acronym | UK700 study |
Study objectives | Case management has increasingly been the recommended approach to care for the severely mentally ill as reliance on mental hospitals has diminished. An influential series of studies in the USA suggested that intensive case management, with case loads of 1:10-15, was particularly effective with the most severe patients, reducing hospitalisation and improving aspects of outcome. Despite equivocal results from replication studies in the UK and Europe this approach is becoming accepted policy. In this study we carried out a large multicentre investigation which was designed to test the impact of reduced case loads. The aim of this study was to compare two levels of intensity of case management for patients with psychotic illnesses. Firstly to see if intensive case management reduces hospitalisation and costs. Secondly, to assess which levels of case management are appropriate for which levels of disability in terms of cost and outcome. |
Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Schizophrenia and other psychoses |
Intervention | Eligible patients were randomly allocated to standard case management (case loads 1:30-35) or intensive case management (case loads 1:10-15). 4 mental health centres in England, 3 in Inner London and 1 in Manchester. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | Clinical symptoms and social functioning were measured at baseline, one years and two years. Hospital use was assessed at two years with subgroup analyses for Afro-Caribbean and the most disabled patients. A range of secondary outcomes based on clinical and social functioning was also assessed. |
Secondary outcome measures | Not provided at time of registration |
Overall study start date | 30/09/1994 |
Completion date | 30/07/1998 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Not Specified |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 708 |
Key inclusion criteria | 708 psychotic patients with histories of repeated hospital admission. |
Key exclusion criteria | Does not match inclusion criteria |
Date of first enrolment | 30/09/1994 |
Date of final enrolment | 30/07/1998 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Department of Psychiatry
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Record Provided by the NHS R&D 'Time-Limited' National Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Government
Government
The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom
Website | http://www.doh.gov.uk |
---|
Funders
Funder type
Government
NHS Mental Health National Research and Development Programme (UK)
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 26/06/1999 | Yes | No |