Magnetic resonance imaging vs invasive coronary angiography as first-line diagnostic modality in new-onset heart failure

ISRCTN ISRCTN16515058
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16515058
Secondary identifying numbers Diagnostik Study
Submission date
21/08/2024
Registration date
22/08/2024
Last edited
14/07/2025
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Newly diagnosed heart failure requires a comprehensive diagnostic work-up to determine its underlying cause. This work-up frequently includes a procedure called invasive coronary angiography (CATH). There are also alternatives, such as a non-invasive procedure called cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). The aim of this study is to find out whether CMR can diagnose the underlying cause of heart failure as well as CATH. If so, this would reduce the number of invasive procedures.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 years and over with newly diagnosed heart failure and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (i.e., below or equal to 40%, measured by echocardiography).

What does the study involve?
The study takes part in a routine clinical setting. All participants receive both diagnostic tests but the order is randomly allocated.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
CATH is currently the standard procedure for newly diagnosed heart failure, so there is no added risk. CMR is a widely available diagnostic test which is non-invasive and involves the use of contrast media (as does CATH). Kidney function is closely observed during the study. The potential benefit is receiving an excellent diagnostic test (CMR), which in many instances can yield additional information that cannot be obtained by CATH.

Where is the study run from?
University Hospital Würzburg (Germany)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
May 2015 to January 2024

Who is funding the study?
German Cardiac Society

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Dr. med. Stefan Störk, PhD, stoerk_s@ukw.de

Contact information

Prof Stefan Störk
Public, Scientific, Principal Investigator

Am Schwarzenberg 15
Würzburg
97078
Germany

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-1771-7249
Phone +49 (0)931 201 46362
Email Stoerk_s@ukw.de

Study information

Study designRandomized diagnostic controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)University/medical school/dental school
Study typeDiagnostic
Participant information sheet 45979_PIS_V1.3_30Aug19_German.pdf
Scientific titleDiagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs coronary angiography as primary diagnostic strategy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction – the randomized CMR-first/CATH-first study
Study acronymDIAGNOSTIK STUDIE
Study objectivesObtaining sufficient diagnostic information already from the first diagnostic procedure to satisfactorily establish or exclude ischemic origin of heart failure: “yes or no”, rendering the second diagnostic procedure redundant
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 19/04/2018, Ethik-Kommission der Universität Würzburg (Versbacher Str. 9, Würzburg, 97078, Germany; +49 (0)931 31 48315; ethikkommission@uni-wuerzburg.de), ref: 298/17

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedNewly diagnosed heart failure
InterventionParticipants are centrally randomised 1:1 to either coronary angiography first (CATH) followed by cardiac resonance imaging (CMR), or CMR first followed by CATH. Randomisation is done electronically in blocks, stratified based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) </=25 % vs >25 % according to the study-qualifying echocardiography.

For endpoint evaluation, the results of each examination are presented separately to a CMR and a CATH expert panel, each blinded to the other procedure. The panel evaluates whether the cause of HF was ischemic and assesses the necessity to perform the other modality.

Additionally, all examinations of both strategies (CATH-first and CMR-first) are also evaluated by the consulting cardiologist, who has access to all available data (clinical reference standard) and is blinded to the evaluation of the expert panels.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureIschaemic cause of heart failure diagnosed via CMR or CATH procedure used as the first modality at baseline
Secondary outcome measuresNumber of CATH procedures that could be avoided when applying the CMR-first strategy: this metric is operationalized as the number of patients in whom the CMR done as a first diagnostic test allowed the researchers to omit an invasive CATH procedure (measured at baseline)
Overall study start date12/05/2015
Completion date31/01/2024

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants200
Total final enrolment229
Key inclusion criteria1. Age ≥18 years
2. Physical and mental ability to give informed consent
3. Written informed consent for study participation
4. Indication for coronary angiography and signed copies of patient information forms for coronary angiography and CMR
5. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% in echocardiography (or comparable imaging modality) within the preceding 3 months
6. Cause of heart failure not yet determined
7. Hospital admission for coronary angiography for further evaluation of heart failure origin or in case of primary in-hospital diagnosis of HFrEF, clinical indication for coronary angiography after best possible cardiac recompensation
Key exclusion criteria1. Pregnancy
2. End-stage renal disease (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/m² (MDRD) and/or dialysis-dependency)
3. Acute coronary syndrome
4. History of coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction
5. Acutely decompensated heart failure or heart failure stage NYHA IV
6. Valvular stenosis (any) ≥grade II
7. Standard exclusion criteria for cardiac MRI (e.g., incompatible metallic implants or devices, known, claustrophobia, allergy against gadolinium-based contrast agents, bodily dimensions incompatible with scanner)
Date of first enrolment22/11/2018
Date of final enrolment31/01/2024

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Germany

Study participating centres

University Hospital Würzburg
Oberdürrbacher Straße 6
Würzburg
97070
Germany
University of Leipzig
Liebigstraße 20
Leipzig
04103
Germany
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1
Hannover
30625
Germany
Klinikum Nürnberg
Breslauer Str. 201
Nürnberg
90471
Germany

Sponsor information

German Cardiac Society
Other

Grafenberger Allee 100
Düsseldorf
40237
Germany

Phone +49 (0)211 600692-0
Email info@dgk.org
Website https://dgk.org/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/02p22ad51

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

Investigator-initiated diagnostic trial

No information available

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie-Herz und Kreislaufforschung.
Private sector organisation / Associations and societies (private and public)
Alternative name(s)
German Cardiac Society, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung e.V., DGK
Location
Germany

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/10/2024
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planResults will be published at the Late Breaking Trial Session at the ESC London, September 2024.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated and analysed during the current study can be made available upon request from Stefan Störk (stoerk_s@ukw.de).

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet version 1.3 30/08/2019 22/08/2024 No Yes
Protocol file version 1.6 14/01/2021 22/08/2024 No No
Results article 12/07/2025 14/07/2025 Yes No

Additional files

45979_PROTOCOL_V1.6_14Jan21_English.pdf
45979_PIS_V1.3_30Aug19_German.pdf

Editorial Notes

14/07/2025: Publication reference added.
21/08/2024: Study's existence confirmed by Ethik-Kommission der Universität Würzburg.