Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial 2: an international randomised trial to compare carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting to prevent stroke

ISRCTN ISRCTN21144362
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN21144362
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00883402
Secondary identifying numbers HTA 06/301/233
Submission date
11/05/2006
Registration date
03/07/2006
Last edited
04/04/2025
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Stroke causes about 10% of all deaths worldwide, and much serious disability. Many strokes are caused by thick fatty deposits narrowing the carotid arteries, which are the main blood vessels in the neck that supply blood to the brain. People with this condition, called carotid artery stenosis, may have no symptoms from it (i.e., they are asymptomatic) until fragments of the deposits fall off, lodge in the brain and cause a major stroke. The standard operation to prevent this, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), involves surgical removal of the deposits before they cause a stroke. It involves some immediate risk but if successful, confers long-term protection. An alternative technique is carotid artery stenting (CAS), which involves placing a fine scaffolding (stent) inside the narrowed artery to hold it open indefinitely. The aim of this study is to compare the immediate risks and long-term benefits of CAS and CEA for the prevention of stroke.

Who can participate?
Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis patients in need of some type of carotid artery treatment, but with substantial uncertainty about whether to treat with CEA or CAS.

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to be treated with either CEA or CAS, and we compare the immediate hazards (mainly heart attack, stroke or death) and the stroke risks over the next few years. The type and severity of any strokes is also assessed.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration

Where is the study run from?
University of Oxford (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
April 2007 to January 2026

Who is funding the study?
Health Technology Assessment Programme (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Alison Halliday
acst@nds.ox.ac.uk

Study website

Contact information

Prof Alison Halliday
Scientific

University of Oxford
Richard Doll Building
Old Road Campus
Roosevelt Drive
Oxford
OX3 7LF
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-9828-3579
Phone +44 (0)1865 617979
Email acst@nds.ox.ac.uk

Study information

Study designInternational randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Patient information can be found at: https://acst-2.org/Patient%20Information/Patient%20Information%20Leaflet.html
Scientific titleAsymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial 2: an international randomised trial to compare carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting to prevent stroke
Study acronymACST-2
Study objectivesTo compare:
1. The peri-procedural risks (within 30 days) of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS)
2. The long-term (5-year) prevention of stroke and of disabling or fatal stroke
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval for the lead centre (St George's, University of London): Hertfordshire 1 Ethics Committee, 11/10/2005, ref: 05/Q0201/66
All other centres have obtained ethics approval before recruitment of the first participant
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedStroke caused by stenosis in the carotid arteries
InterventionCarotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure1. Peri-procedural hazards (within 30 days) stroke, myocardial infarction and death
2. Long-term hazards (after 30 days) stroke and death
Secondary outcome measuresCost-effectivness of CEA and CAS
Overall study start date01/04/2007
Completion date01/01/2026

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participantsAt least 5000 patients
Total final enrolment3625
Key inclusion criteria1. Patient in need of some type of carotid artery intervention, with substantial uncertainty about whether to treat with CEA or CAS
2. Carotid artery stenosis with no ipsilateral carotid territory symptoms within the last 6 months
3. Patient fit and willing for follow-up
Key exclusion criteria1. Previous CEA or CAS in randomised artery
2. High risk of adverse events of trial treatment e.g. inaccessible stenosis
3. Small likelihood of worthwhile benefit e.g. low risk of stroke
4. Patient unable or unwilling to give informed consent
Date of first enrolment01/04/2007
Date of final enrolment28/01/2021

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Belgium
  • Bulgaria
  • Canada
  • China
  • Czech Republic
  • Egypt
  • England
  • Estonia
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hungary
  • Ireland
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Poland
  • Russian Federation
  • Serbia
  • Slovakia
  • Slovenia
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • United Kingdom
  • United States of America

Study participating centre

University of Oxford
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Oxford (UK)
University/education

Clinical Trials and Research Governance
Manor House
John Radcliffe Hospital
Headington
Oxford
OX3 9DU
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1865 221 345
Email Richard.Liwicki@admin.ox.ac.uk
Website http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/rso/contactus/ctrg.shtml
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/052gg0110

Funders

Funder type

Government

Health Technology Assessment Programme
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 01/08/2009 Yes No
Results article results 01/11/2013 Yes No
Results article 27/08/2021 02/09/2021 Yes No

Editorial Notes

04/04/2025: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment end date was changed from 31/12/2019 to 28/01/2021.
2. The overall end date was changed from 31/12/2019 to 01/01/2026.
3. The plain English summary was updated to reflect these changes.
02/09/2021: The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The total final enrolment number has been added from the reference.
16/03/2016: Plain English summary added.
09/12/2014: The overall trial end date was changed from 31/03/2012 to 31/12/2019.
02/09/2009: The sponsor was changed from St. George's University of London to University of Oxford.