ISRCTN ISRCTN21955180
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN21955180
Secondary identifying numbers SCC 1357v3
Submission date
19/03/2014
Registration date
14/04/2014
Last edited
15/10/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Iron supplementation is recommended for all pregnant women in those places where anaemia (iron deficiency) rates exceed 40%. Recent studies show this can pose a risk to pregnant women. Therefore, there is a need to explore screen-and-treat options to minimise iron exposure during pregnancy. This can be done using an overall lower dosage of iron that would achieve similar results as the standard recommendation. However, we don’t know how to best assess iron deficiency when infections are prevalent. The level of the hormone hepcidin is thought to indicate whether it is safe to receive iron. This initial study will lead to a larger study to find out if a screen-and-treat approach to iron supplementation using hepcidin levels will prevent anaemia at a lower iron dose, hence improving safety.

Who can participate?
Pregnant women, 14 – 22 weeks into pregnancy, coming to participating Reproductive and Child Health Clinics (RCH) can take part.

What does the study involve?
After taking an initial blood sample from the vein and assessing the age of their pregnancy, each participant is randomly allocated into one of the three study groups, to either receive: (a) UNICEF/WHO/UNU international multiple micronutrient preparation (UNIMMAP) containing 60 mg/day iron (reference group); (b) UNIMMAP containing 60 mg/day iron but based on a weekly hepcidin screening to tell if iron should be given for the next 7 days or not; (c) UNIMMAP containing 30 mg/day iron as in (b) for 12 weeks in rural Gambia. Each week, finger prick blood samples will be taken to find out the hepcidin level, haemoglobin (Hb) level and test for malaria. During the 12-week follow-up, additional blood samples are taken and side-effects and any other health issues are assessed. Although active participation finishes at the end of the supplementation period, a last investigation regarding pregnancy outcome will be made after delivery. This will include a postnatal check-up to monitor the mothers’ general condition after delivery and assessment of babies. All participants will be provided with long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs).

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Benefits will include study participants having access to basic medical services for free. Participants will benefit from weekly monitoring by qualified field workers where anaemia can be detected. Malaria can also be diagnosed and managed. There are risks associated with a large intake of iron supplement. However, the reference group of this study takes iron as per standard government practice and the other two groups take an overall lower dose of iron. This will decrease the risk of over dosage. If those in group (c) are moderately anaemic (borderline severe anaemia), they may be at risk of receiving too little iron but will be monitored every week and if seen to become severely anaemic, will be treated as per Gambia Government recommendation for management of severe anaemia. The UNIMMAP formulation has been used in other pregnancy studies in developing countries with good patient compliance and acceptability. No emergency is expected from taking this supplement. However, a study nurse will always be available who will decide whether to refer a participant to a health facility in case this is necessary.

Where is the study run from?
This study will be run from 12 communities in Jarra West and Kiang East of Rural Gambia.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study starts in April 2014 and will finish enrolment within about 1 year.

Who is funding the study?
Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (USA).

Who is the main contact?
Mr Amat Bah
Amat.Bah@lshtm.ac.uk

Contact information

Mr Amat Bah
Scientific

MRC International Nutrition Group
MRC Keneba
Banjul
POBOX 273
Gambia

Phone +220 9901696
Email Amat.Bah@lshtm.ac.uk

Study information

Study designProof-of-concept three-arm double-blind randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typePrevention
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing standard dose of iron supplementation for pregnant women with two screen-and-treat approaches using hepcidin as a biomarker for ready and safe to receive iron
Study acronymHAPn
Study objectivesIt is hypothesised that a screen-and-treat approach to iron supplementation will achieve similar efficacy in combating iron deficiency (ID) and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) at a lower overall dosage of iron (with the assumption that this will improve safety and tolerability).
Ethics approval(s)The Gambia Government/MRC Joint Ethics Committee, 19/12/2013, ref. SCC 1357v3
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedAnaemia in pregnancy
InterventionThis study will involve 462 pregnant women between 14 and 22 weeks gestation over a period of 12 weeks randomly assigned (1:1:1 ratio) to either receive:
1. UNIMMAP containing 60 mg/day iron
2. UNIMMAP containing 60 mg/day iron but based on a weekly hepcidin screening indicating if iron can be given for the next 7 days or not
3. UNIMMAP containing 30 mg/day iron

Intervention product
The nutritional supplement to be used in this trial is the UNICEF/WHO/UNU international multiple micronutrient preparation (UNIMMAP). All formulations also contain 400 ug folic acid and 14 other micronutrients. Three investigational products will be administered:

UNIMMAP with 60 mg iron
UNIMMAP with 30 mg iron
UNIMMAP with 0 mg iron (for when iron is not needed).
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Hepcidin
Primary outcome measureHaemoglobin - defined as pregnancy stage adjusted haemoglobin at day 84
Secondary outcome measures1. Proportion of anaemia (Hb < 11 g/dl) at day 84
2. Iron deficiency prevalence at day 84
3. Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) prevalence at day 84
4. Iron dosage
5. Beneficial and adverse events
6. Compliance
Overall study start date21/04/2014
Completion date21/03/2015

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexFemale
Target number of participants462
Total final enrolment498
Key inclusion criteria1. Pregnant (gestational age between 14 - 22 weeks)
2. Age: 18 to 45 years
3. Likely to be resident in study area for duration of trial
4. Written informed consent obtained
Key exclusion criteria1. Severely anaemic (< 7 g/dl)
2. Seriously ill (infectious disease of clinical significance) at recruitment
3. Chronic disease
4. Pregnancy complications (e.g. pre-eclampsia) at enrolment
5. Already part of another study
Date of first enrolment21/04/2014
Date of final enrolment21/03/2015

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Gambia

Study participating centre

MRC International Nutrition Group
Banjul
POBOX 273
Gambia

Sponsor information

The Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK)
Research council

c/o Professor Andrew M. Prentice
Director
MRC International Nutrition Group
LSHTM
Keppel Street
London
WC1E 7HT
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7636 8636
Email Andrew.Prentice@lshtm.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03x94j517

Funders

Funder type

Research council

Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK) - International Nutrition Group

No information available

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (USA)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 13/07/2016 Yes No
Results article results 01/11/2019 15/10/2019 Yes No

Editorial Notes

15/10/2019: The following changes were made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The final enrolment number was added from the reference.
19/12/2017: Publication reference added.