A randomised-controlled trial comparing bubble and flow driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants in a resource poor setting

ISRCTN ISRCTN22578364
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN22578364
Protocol serial number N/A
Sponsor Scientific Research Centre of Maternal and Child Health (Armenia)
Funder Birthlink (UK)
Submission date
09/04/2007
Registration date
09/05/2007
Last edited
21/04/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Pavel Mazmanyan
Scientific

Mashtots ave. 22
Yerevan
375002
Armenia

Phone +374 (8)91 41 65 89
Email pavelart@gmail.com

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised and controlled, minimisation by sex and antenatal steroids
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleA randomised-controlled trial comparing bubble and flow driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants in a resource poor setting
Study objectivesThere are two principal devices currently available for the administration of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). These are the flow driver and bubble systems. The flow driver is now in established use in the developed world; there is currently renewed interest in the bubble CPAP system. The systems differ substantially in cost with bubble CPAP considerably cheaper. However their efficacy has not been formally compared. In order to be adopted as a standard of care it would be necessary to demonstrate that bubble CPAP is as or more efficacious than flow driver CPAP.
Ethics approval(s)Institutional Review Board (IRB) committee for clinical studies, American University of Armenia, 09/03/2007
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedNeonatal Diseases: respiratory
InterventionTrial procedures are exactly as would be performed in the course of standard care; the only difference is the selection of type of CPAP by randomisation.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure(s)

Total days receiving CPAP until the time of discharge from the unit.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. Infants requiring ventilation
2. Deaths
3. Pneumothorax rate
4. Facial/nasal excoriation

Outcomes will be measured at the time of discharge from the unit.

Completion date30/03/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNeonate
SexAll
Target sample size at registration128
Key inclusion criteria1. Preterm infants
2. Parental consent
Key exclusion criteriaMajor life-threatening congenital malformation.
Date of first enrolment24/03/2007
Date of final enrolment30/03/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Armenia

Study participating centre

Mashtots ave. 22
Yerevan
375002
Armenia

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/01/2016 Yes No
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes

Editorial Notes

21/04/2016: Publication reference added.