A neuroscience perspective on anxiety proneness - sex differences, monoaminergic pathways and treatment response

ISRCTN ISRCTN24929928
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN24929928
EudraCT/CTIS number 2010-023007-10
Secondary identifying numbers TF2010
Submission date
08/07/2011
Registration date
02/08/2011
Last edited
27/06/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Anxiety disorders are more common in women. It is not clear why but anxiety proneness may be related to imbalances in brain neurotransmitter systems such as the serotonin and dopamine systems. Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and has previously been demonstrated to be effective in patients suffering from anxiety conditions like social anxiety disorder (SAD). SAD is characterized by excessive fear of being observed or scrutinized by unfamiliar persons. An individual with SAD is agonized by the potential risk of performing inadequately or showing overt signs of nervousness with resultant embarrassment or humiliation in social situations, for example when speaking in front of a group. SAD, and other anxiety disorders, can also be treated with psychosocial interventions like cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT). It has recently been demonstrated that CBT can be delivered as a structured self-help program via the internet. It is unclear, however, how effective a combination of drug and psychosocial treatments is. Moreover, it is not known how combined treatments change activity patterns in the brain. The aim of this study is to examine the brain processes underlying anxiety proneness, why anxiety proneness is elevated in women, and what biological processes are related to treatment outcome in patients with SAD.

Who can participate?
We will recruit 48 medication-free patients (men and women) between 20-65 years of age who fulfill the diagnostic criteria for social anxiety disorder (SAD). For comparison, we will also recruit 48 healthy people.

What does the study involve?
By use of neuroimaging techniques, this study examines serotonin and dopamine reuptake functions, as well as neural activation patterns during emotional stimulation, in patients diagnosed with SAD, before and after 9 weeks of treatment. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either escitalopram in combination with Internet-delivered CBT, or a placebo (dummy) drug in combination with CBT. The effects of the treatment on serotonin and dopamine reuptake processes will be studied with positron emission tomography (PET). Moreover, neural activation patterns during emotional stimulation will be studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Brain activity will be recorded while patients experience anticipatory anxiety before making a public speech, and while they view images with varying degrees of emotional content. Assessments will be repeated after the 9-week treatment period. A group of healthy controls is also included in the study, for comparison with patients before treatment.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Escitalopram is usually well tolerated but may cause side effects like nausea for some individuals. Participants may experience discomfort while being assessed with PET or fMRI. During PET assessments short-lived radioactive tracer isotopes are injected. However, the radiation dose is well within established safety limits. We don’t expect that participation in this study will lead to negative consequences provided that the safety regulations are followed.

Where is the study run from?
The study will be conducted at the Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, and University Hospital in Uppsala, Sweden.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2011 to December 2012

Who is funding the study?
The study is funded by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, the Swedish Research Council, and the Uppsala University Amersham fund.

Who is the main contact?
Professor Tomas Furmark
tomas.furmark@psyk.uu.se

Study website

Contact information

Prof Tomas Furmark
Scientific

Uppsala University
Department of Psychology
Box 1225
Uppsala
SE-751 42
Sweden

Email tomas.furmark@psyk.uu.se

Study information

Study designDouble-blind randomized controlled trial with two arms
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA neuroscience perspective on anxiety proneness - sex differences, monoaminergic pathways and treatment response: a randomised controlled trial
Study hypothesis1. Serotonin and dopamine reuptake functions are compromised in patients with social anxiety disorder, possibly more so in women than in men
2. Compromised serotonin reuptake functions are restored by successful treatment (escitalopram and CBT)
3. Patients on escitalopram, as compared to placebo, will possibly also demonstrate altered dopamine reuptake functions (due to an increased endogenous dopamine concentration or an effect by the medication on the transporter protein)
4. Serotonin and dopamine related genes affect reuptake functions and treatment success, possibly differently in women and men
5. Networks in the brain that generate and/or attenuate emotion, as measured by functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) during emotional activation, behave differently in women compared to men, and in patients with social anxiety disorder compared to healthy controls
6. Gray matter volume, measured with voxel-based morphometry (VBM), in emotion relevant areas in the brain, differ between women and men, and between patients with social anxiety disorder and healthy controls. That can also be true for white matter nerve fibers, measured with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
7. Women and men with social anxiety will differ from healthy controls regarding the extinction of learned (conditioned) fear, and women will demonstrate decreased extinction recall compared to men
Ethics approval(s)Research Ethics Committee, Uppsala, ref: 2010/226
ConditionSocial anxiety disorder (social phobia)
Intervention1. A group of healthy controls is also included for pretreatment comparisons
2. Patients with social anxiety disorder will be randomized into one of two treatment conditions:
2.1. Either a escitalopram + CBT combination
2.2. Or a placebo + CBT combination
3. Principally, all other therapies will be avoided
4. Administration of escitalopram is based on the accepted recommended dose 10 mg per day during the first week and 20 mg per day for the rest of the treatment period
5. Doses are packaged so that the patients take one capsule per day
6. Placebo is administered with a corresponding capsule without active substances
7. The CBT treatment consists of a previously evaluated self-help manual for social anxiety disorder that is divided into nine modules adapted for use over the Internet
8. Participants are asked to complete one module every week
9. Each module consists of information and exercises (homework assignments) and ends with a short quiz to check adherence
10. The CBT self-help program has been found efficacious in several previous trials
Intervention typeMixed
Primary outcome measure1. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)
2. The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) scale
3. Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI-S) during antecipatory anxiety in the fMRI-setting
Secondary outcome measures1. Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS)
2. Social Phobia Scale (SPS)
3. Social Phobia Screening Questionnaire (SPSQ)
4. Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S)
5. Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
6. Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)
7. Karolinska Scale of Personality (KSP)
8. NEO PI-R
9. Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI-T)
Overall study start date01/09/2011
Overall study end date31/12/2012

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants48 patients with social anxiety disorder, 48 healthy controls
Participant inclusion criteriaPatients:
1. Social anxiety disorder (social phobia), according to DSM-IV, must be the main diagnosis as assessed with the structured clinical interview for DSM disorders (SCID)
2. Otherwise somatically healthy
3. Age 18 or older but not postmenopausal
4. Willingness to participate in a symptom provocation brain imaging trial

Healthy controls:
1. No psychiatric diagnosis and otherwise somatically healthy
2. Age 18 or older but not postmenopausal
3. Willingness to participate in a brain imaging trial
Participant exclusion criteria1. Treatment of social anxiety within the three months preceding the study
2. Current serious or dominant psychiatric disorder other than social anxiety disorder (e.g. psychosis, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder)
3. Suicidal ideation
4. Chronic use of prescribed medication that could influence the results
5. Abuse of alcohol or narcotics
6. Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study period
7. Menopause
8. Previous positron emission tomography (PET) examination
9. Contraindications for MRI investigations (e.g. implants or other metal objects in the body, brain and heart operations)
Recruitment start date01/09/2011
Recruitment end date31/12/2012

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Sweden

Study participating centre

Uppsala University
Uppsala
SE-751 42
Sweden

Sponsor information

Uppsala University (Sweden)
University/education

c/o Prof Tomas Furmark
Department of Psychology
Box 1225
Uppsala
SE-75142
Sweden

Website http://www.uu.se/en/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/048a87296

Funders

Funder type

Research council

Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Alternative name(s)
Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, FAS
Location
Sweden
The Uppsala University Amersham Fund (Sweden)

No information available

Vetenskapsrådet
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
Swedish Research Council, VR
Location
Sweden

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/09/2016 Yes No

Editorial Notes

27/06/2016: Publication reference added.