ISRCTN ISRCTN26156392
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN26156392
Secondary identifying numbers G9408332
Submission date
23/10/2000
Registration date
23/10/2000
Last edited
02/10/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Carotid stenosis is a condition where one or both of the carotid arteries (the main blood vessels that supply the head and neck) become narrowed due to a build-up of fatty deposits (plaque). This increases the risk of having a stroke, when the blood supply to part of the brain is cut off. The aim of this study is to compare carotid surgery (carotid endarterectomy or CEA) with the best medical treatment (BMT) in patients with carotid stenosis but no symptoms. The aim of this study is to find out whether CEA and BMT together improve stroke-free survival time when compared to BMT alone. The study also aims to identify high-risk groups for whom the benefits of surgery and of BMT are increased and the long-term follow-up is looking at whether carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of dementia in the long-term.

Who can participate?
Patients whose carotid stenosis has not caused symptoms for at least 6 months, and who have no past history of stroke

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to be treated with either CEA plus BMT or BMT alone, unless symptoms develop requiring a CEA. Fatal and non-fatal stroke and death rates are compared between the two groups. For long-term follow-up the UK and Swedish participants' health records are also analysed for rates of stroke, death and dementia in the long-term. Relatives or friends of the UK participants are also asked to complete a postal questionnaire about the participant’s cognitive (mental) function.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There is no direct benefit to taking part but the information gained may help doctors to treat patients with asymptomatic carotid disease better in the future. There is no additional risk to taking part in this study. Long-term follow-up: there is no direct benefit to taking part but this follow-up may contribute to a wider benefit if carotid surgery is found to reduce the risk of developing later memory and thinking problems. The long-term follow-up does not involve any additional physical risk to the participants or does not provide any risk in relation to loss of anonymity.

Where is the study run from?
John Radcliffe Hospital (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
April 1993 to October 2019

Who is funding the study?
1. Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK)
2. Alzheimer’s Society (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Alison Halliday
acst@nds.ox.ac.uk

Study website

Contact information

Prof Alison Halliday
Scientific

ACST Trials Office
Level 6, West Wing
John Radcliffe Hospital
Headley Way
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-9828-3579
Phone +44 (0)1865 617975
Email acst@nds.ox.ac.uk
Ms Mary Sneade
Public

ACST trials office
Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus
Roosevelt Drive
Oxford
OX3 7LF
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-8860-0363
Phone +44 (0)1865 617978
Email acst@nds.ox.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleAsymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST-1)
Study acronymACST-1
Study hypothesisThe aim is to determine whether CEA and BMT improve stroke-free survival time when compared to BMT alone. The trial will also help identify high-risk groups in whom the benefits of surgery and of BMT would be increased.

Added 21/02/2017:
Primary objective: In participants with carotid stenosis, does carotid endarterectomy reduce the long-term risk of dementia, stroke or death related to carotid stenosis?
Secondary objective: In patients with carotid stenosis, does the long-term risk of dementia, stroke or death in recorded electronic records vary by duration of follow up, or participant characteristic recorded at baseline?

Updated 28/09/2018:
Primary objective: In participants with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, does carotid endarterectomy reduce the long-term risk of stroke, dementia or death, related to carotid stenosis?
Secondary objective: In patients with carotid stenosis, does the long-term risk of dementia or stroke in recorded electronic health records vary by duration of follow-up, or participant characteristic recorded at baseline?
Ethics approval(s)London Research Ethics Committee, 11/11/1998, ref: 98/2/92
ConditionCarotid stenosis
InterventionCEA and best medical treatment (BMT) vs BMT alone

Added 19/08/2008: follow-up is a minimum of 5 years

Added 21/02/2017:
No further treatment interventions are planned as part of the long-term follow-up study.
Phase 1: Analysis of long-term data from UK and Swedish ACST-1 participant’s health records through electronic data linkage (NHS digital, UK; Socialstyrelsen, Sweden) for specific outcomes of incident stroke, death and dementia (16/SC/0406). The trialists will also be applying to the equivalent regulatory authorities in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
Phase 2: A relative or friend of the ACST-1 UK participants will be invited to complete a postal questionnaire (Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive decline in the Elderly-IQCODE) on the participant’s cognitive function.

Updated 28/09/2018:
No further treatment interventions are planned as part of the long-term follow-up study.
Phase 1: Phase 1: Analysis of long-term data from UK and Swedish ACST-1 participant’s health records through electronic data linkage (NHS digital, UK; Socialstyrelsen, Sweden) for specific outcomes of incident stroke and dementia (ethics approved 16/SC/0406).
Phase 2: A relative or friend of the ACST-1 UK participants will be invited to complete a postal questionnaire (short form of the validated ‘Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive decline in the Elderly’ - IQCODE) on the participant’s cognitive function.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureFatal and non-fatal stroke and death rates

Added 10/03/2017:
Long-term follow-up to determine specific outcomes of stroke and cognitive decline:
1. Long-term risk of dementia, stroke or death, measured using participant’s health records through electronic data linkage (NHS digital, UK; Socialstyrelsen, Sweden) at least 14 years post enrolment
2. Cognitive function, measured using the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE), MoCA and TICS-N, at least 14 years post enrolment

Updated 28/09/2018:
Long-term follow-up to determine specific outcomes of stroke and cognitive decline:
1. Long-term risk of dementia, stroke or death, measured using participant’s health records through electronic data linkage (NHS digital, UK; Socialstyrelsen, Sweden) at least 14 years post enrolment
2. Cognitive function, measured using the short form of the validated Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE), at least 14 years post enrolment
Secondary outcome measuresSubsidiary analyses in an effort to identify high and low risk groups will include the effect of risk factors such as presence or absence of silent cerebral infarction on clinical outcome
Overall study start date01/04/1993
Overall study end date01/10/2019

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants3120; 1601 for long-term follow-up
Participant inclusion criteria1. Patients whose carotid stenosis has not caused symptoms for at least 6 months
2. No past history of ipsilateral disabling or severe contralateral stroke
3. No clear indications or contraindications to carotid endarterectomy (CEA)
Participant exclusion criteria1. Patients with a small likelihood of worthwhile benefit e.g. those with major life-threatening disease.
2. Patients who have had recent myocardial infarct, intracerebral neoplasia or aneurysm, or restenosis of an artery following previous CEA
Recruitment start date19/04/1993
Recruitment end date01/05/2003

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Brazil
  • Bulgaria
  • Canada
  • Croatia
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • England
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hungary
  • Ireland
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Netherlands
  • New Zealand
  • Norway
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Russian Federation
  • Slovenia
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Tunisia
  • United Kingdom
  • United States of America

Study participating centres

John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom
123 other centres
-
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK)
Research council

20 Park Crescent
London
W1B 1AL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7636 5422
Email clinical.trial@headoffice.mrc.ac.uk
Website http://www.mrc.ac.uk
University of Oxford
University/education

Research Services
Clinical Trials and Research Governance (CTRG)
Joint Research Office
1st Floor, Boundary Brook House
Churchill Drive
Headington
Oxford
OX3 7GB
England
United Kingdom

Email ctrg@admin.ox.ac.uk
Website https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/ctrg
University of Oxford
Not defined

Funders

Funder type

Research council

Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK)
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
Medical Research Council (United Kingdom), UK Medical Research Council, MRC
Location
United Kingdom
Alzheimer's Society
Private sector organisation / Associations and societies (private and public)
Alternative name(s)
alzheimerssoc
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/10/2019
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot expected to be made available
Publication and dissemination planThe long-term follow-up results are anticipated to be presented at relevant scientific forums and conferences in the spring 2019 and published end of 2019 in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 08/05/2004 Yes No
Results article results 25/09/2010 Yes No
Results article results 01/06/2013 Yes No
Results article results 01/05/2016 Yes No
Results article results 01/12/2016 Yes No
Results article results 01/12/2016 Yes No
Results article results 01/12/2016 Yes No

Editorial Notes

02/10/2018: The intention to publish date was changed from 01/10/2018 to 31/10/2019.
28/09/2018: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The study hypothesis, interventions and primary outcome measure fields were updated.
2. The overall trial end date was changed from 31/12/2018 to 01/10/2019.
3. Contact and sponsor details updated.
18/09/2017: Contact details updated.
21/02/2017: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall trial end date was changed from 31/03/2004 to 31/12/2018.
2. The target number of participants was changed from '3120' to '3120; 1601 for long-term follow-up'.
3. Alzheimer’s Society was added as a funder for the long-term follow up.
4. The acronym was changed from ACST to ACST-1.
5. Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Netherlands, Tunisia and USA were added to the countries of recruitment.
6. University of Oxford was added as a sponsor.
27/01/2017: Publication references added.