Hydrocoil: Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study

ISRCTN ISRCTN30531382
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN30531382
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
31/07/2004
Registration date
01/04/2005
Last edited
14/11/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Dr Philip White
Scientific

Dept. of Neuroradiology
Western General Hospital
Crewe Road
Edinburgh
EH4 2XU
United Kingdom

Email pmw@skull.dcn.ed.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Patient information sheet can be found at http://www.mymainplace.com/HelpStudy/Collateral/PIS%20V3.doc.
Scientific title
Study acronymHELPS
Study hypothesisThe HELPS (hydrocoil: endovascular aneurysm occlusion and packing study) trial aims to compare major aneurysm recurrence rate on follow-up angiography at 15 - 18 months between patients allocated hydrocoil versus patients allocated bare platinum coiling.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration.
ConditionIntracranial aneurysms
InterventionThis study is now closed to recruitment.

Patients are randomised to the hydrogel coil or control arms by using concealed allocation with minimisation matching groups. Any bare platinum coils are allowed in the control arm, and assist devices could be used as clinically required.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureAngiographic outcomes at 15-18 months between aneurysms coiled using bare platinum coils (control group) and those coiled using hydrocoil embolic system.
Secondary outcome measuresSecondary outcome measures include packing density, clinical outcome, rebleed and retreatment comparisons between these 2 groups.
Overall study start date01/09/2004
Overall study end date30/06/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants500
Participant inclusion criteriaPatient presenting with a cerebral aneurysm deemed to require endovascular treatment by the neurosurgeon/neurointerventionist (generically referred to subsequently as 'the neurovascular team'), and:
1. Patient has given fully informed consent to endovascular coiling procedure
2. Aneurysm 2 - 25 mm in maximum diameter
3. Anatomy such that endovascular occlusion is deemed possible (not necessarily probable)
4. The neurointerventionist is content to use either bare platinum or hydrocoil embolic system (HES) depending on randomisation result (i.e., clinical equipoise principle applies)
5. The neurointerventionist is content not to use any other type of coated coil
6. Patient World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) Grade 0 - 2 and aged 18 - 75 years
7. The patient has not been previously randomised into this trial
8. Aneurysm has not previously been treated (by coiling or clipping)
Participant exclusion criteriaSubjects will not be considered for the trial unless they meet all the inclusion criteria. If the patient has more than one aneurysm requiring treatment at the same treatment episode they will not be eligible for the trial. If treatment will be staged in a patient with multiple aneurysms and only one aneurysm will be treated at one sitting then the patient is eligible. However, a patient may not be randomised into the study more than once.

From the moment of randomisation, the patient is in the trial whether they receive trial treatment or not, and will be followed up and accounted for in the final analysis (intention-to-treat).

Death or procedural/disease related morbidity may result in some subjects not having check angiography (or magnetic resonance angiography [MRA] if unit uses this as standard mode of follow-up). These patients will be counted as poor outcomes in the primary analysis.

Retreatment of previously coiled or clipped aneurysm is an exclusion criteria.

Use of coil assist devices (stent, balloon, trispan etc.) should be recorded but is not an exclusion criteria. It must be recorded in order to ascertain if any difference in use between control and hydrocoil groups acts as a potential confounding variable.
Recruitment start date01/09/2004
Recruitment end date30/06/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Argentina
  • Australia
  • Brazil
  • France
  • Germany
  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom
  • United States of America

Study participating centre

Dept. of Neuroradiology
Edinburgh
EH4 2XU
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Lothian University Hospitals Division (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Research & Development Office, Room G8137
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Little France Crescent
Edinburgh
EH16 4SA
Scotland
United Kingdom

Email neil.feltham@luht.scot.nhs.uk
Website http://www.research.luht.scot.nhs.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03q82t418

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Microvention Incorporated (USA)

No information available

Lothian University Hospitals Division (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/02/2008 Yes No
Results article results 14/05/2011 Yes No