Arm Intervention After Stroke (AIAS): a feasibility study
ISRCTN | ISRCTN33421390 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN33421390 |
Secondary identifying numbers | GN09GE229 (Ethics no: 09/S0704/32) |
- Submission date
- 07/07/2009
- Registration date
- 03/09/2009
- Last edited
- 15/07/2016
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English Summary
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Mrs Fiona Coupar
Scientific
Scientific
Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine
Room 35, Level 4
University Block
Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow
G31 2ER
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 141 211 4000 |
---|---|
fmacvicar@yahoo.com |
Study information
Study design | Single-blind single-centre randomised feasibility/pilot study |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | A randomised, feasibility, safety and efficacy of the ArmeoSpring arm orthosis for acute stroke patients with arm deficits |
Study acronym | AIAS |
Study hypothesis | Arm rehabilitation provided by the ArmeoSpring is a feasible and acceptable intervention to implement with acute stroke patients with arm deficits. Principal research question: Is arm rehabilitaiton provided by the ArmeoSpring arm orthosis a feasible and acceptable intervention for acute stroke patients with arm deficits? Secondary research questions: 1. Is arm rehabilitation provided by the ArmeoSpring arm orthosis, a safe intervention for acute stroke patients with arm deficits, compared with standard therapy? 2. What are the effects of two different intenstities of arm rehabilitaiton provided by the ArmeoSpring arm orthosis for acute stroke patients with arm deficits, compared with standard therapy? |
Ethics approval(s) | West of Scotland (REC 4) Ethics Committee, 12/06/2009, ref: 09/S0704/32 |
Condition | Acute stroke |
Intervention | The participants will be randomly allocated to one of the three following arms: 1. Standard care: usual therapy, provided by physiotherapists and occupational therapists 2. ArmeoSpring arm orthosis intervention 1: 40 minutes, 3 times a week, in addition to standard care 3. ArmeoSpring arm orthosis intervention 2: 60 minutes, 5 times a week, in addition to standard care Total duration of interventions: 2 weeks or discharge (whichever is sooner) Total duration of follow-up: 3 months ArmeoSpring intervention will be delievered by a research therapist. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | 1. Feasibility of experimental interventions: 1.1. Number of per protocol interventions recorded at end of intervention period 1.2. Reasons for non-compliance recorded at end of intervention period 2. Acceptability/satisfaction of experimental intervention: informal interviews with participants completed at the end of the intervention period |
Secondary outcome measures | Safety outcomes: 1. Arm pain (including shoulder) (measured by 5 point scale none-excruciating) 2. Shoulder subluxation (clinical report) 3. Fatigue (Borg perceived Exertion Scale) 4. All adverse events Safety outcomes will be continously monitored and recorded throughout the study, however will be formally recorded at the end of the intervention period (2 weeks or discharge) (by clinical report and patient scales) and at 3 month report (by patient report and scales, on appropriate measures). Efficacy outcomes: 1. Upper limb function: Action Research Arm Test 2. Upper limb impairment: Fugl-Meyer assessment (upper limb section) 3. Disability: Barthel Index Exploratory outcome: To assist in power calculation to determine the number of subjects required for a phase III randomised controlled trial. |
Overall study start date | 03/08/2009 |
Overall study end date | 04/04/2010 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 18 |
Participant inclusion criteria | 1. Age greater than 18 years, either sex 2. Clinical diagnosis of stroke 3. Minimum grade 1 on MRC scale for arm impairment 4. Maximum grade 4 on MRC scale for arm impairment 5. Medically stable 6. Informed consent 7. Ability to understand and follow simple instructions 8. Sitting balance sufficent to use Armeo arm orthosis safely |
Participant exclusion criteria | 1. Orthosis cannot be fitted to affected limb 2. Bone instability of hemiparetic upper limb (fractures, severe arthritis) 3. Pre-exisiting upper limb deficits 4. Pronounced, fixed contractures of hemiparetic upper limb 5. Open skin lesions on hemiparetic upper limb 6. Major sensory deficit of hemiparetic upper limb 7. Shoulder instability or excessive pain 8. Severe spasticity 9. Severe spontaneous movements e.g. ataxia, dyskinesia 10. Confused or non-cooperative 11. Requiring isolation due to infection 12. Severe visual, perceptual or cognitive problems precluding participation in study protocol 13. Involved in any other intervention study |
Recruitment start date | 03/08/2009 |
Recruitment end date | 04/04/2010 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Scotland
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine
Glasgow
G31 2ER
United Kingdom
G31 2ER
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (UK)
Government
Government
Tennant Institute
38 Church Street
Western Infirmary
Glasgow
G11 6NT
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 141 354 9275 |
---|---|
darrengibson@ggc.scot.nhs.uk | |
Website | http://www.nhsggc.org.uk |
https://ror.org/05kdz4d87 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Health Department (UK) (ref: CZF/07/12)
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Editorial Notes
15/07/2016: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator.