Comparing pain relief methods for keyhole bowel surgery: A study on two types of nerve blocks

ISRCTN ISRCTN36371400
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN36371400
Submission date
18/11/2024
Registration date
25/11/2024
Last edited
25/11/2024
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
This study aims to compare two pain relief methods used after keyhole bowel surgery. The goal is to find the most effective way to reduce pain and minimize the need for morphine, which can have side effects. The two methods being compared are the quadratus lumborum (QL) block and the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.

Who can participate?
Patients who are undergoing laparoscopic (keyhole) colorectal surgery can participate in this study.

What does the study involve?
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group will receive the QL block, and the other will receive the TAP block. Both groups will receive general anesthesia during surgery. After the surgery, participants will receive one of the two pain relief methods. All participants will also receive standard pain relief medications, including paracetamol, nefopam, and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants may benefit from effective pain relief from one of the two methods. Both methods have been shown to reduce pain after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. There is a very small risk of complications related to anesthesia, but these are rare and will be closely monitored by medical staff.

Where is the study run from?
Binh Dan Hospital (Viet Nam)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July 2024 to September 2025

Who is funding the study?
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City Medicine and Pharmacy University (Viet Nam)

Who is the main contact?
Mr Van Phuoc Toan, dr.toanvan@gmail.com

Contact information

Mr Phuoc Toan Van
Public, Scientific, Principal Investigator

371 Dien Bien Phu - Ward 4 - District 3
Ho Chi Minh
700000
Viet Nam

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0009-0009-6233-0826
Phone +84 902993591
Email dr.toanvan@gmail.com

Study information

Study designRandomized controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital, University/medical school/dental school
Study typeEfficacy
Scientific titleComparison of analgesic efficacy between quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominal plane block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Study objectivesQuadratus lumborum anesthesia reduces morphine consumption 48 hours postoperatively by 50% compared with transverse abdominal plane anesthesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 22/10/2024, Ethics council in biomedical research, University of Medicine and Pharmacy (217 Hong Bang, Ward 11, District 5, Hochiminh city, 700000, Viet Nam; +84 28 3855 0507; hoidongdaoducdhyd@ump.edu.vn), ref: IRB-VN01002/IRB00010293/FWA00023448

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedAnalgesic after laparoscopic colorectal surgery
InterventionAll patients recruited into the study will be randomized into 2 groups: GL group (quadra lumbar muscle block group) and TAP group (transversus abdominis plane block group) by creating a block random number table in Excel software 2016 (copyrighted by the Department of Public Health - Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy). Choosing the RAND function with the sort A->Z command will give you similar random numbers corresponds to the serial number of the patients in the research sample. Choose an odd number QL group and even numbers for TAP group.
The patient is induced, intubated and maintained according to the protocol hospital. At the end of surgery: After the last stitch of skin is sutured, the patient is fine perform QL or TAP according to initial randomization.
Both methods are performed under ultrasound guidance. The anesthetic used is ropivacaine 0.25% 20ml for each side.
Post-operative analgesia includes: patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine, paracetamol 1gr per 8h, nefopam 20mg per 8h.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureTotal dose of morphine-PCA 48 hours after surgery measured using patient records
Secondary outcome measuresMeasured using patient records:
1. Total dose of morphine-PCA at postoperative time points (1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours)
2. VAS pain scores at rest and movement at postoperative times (1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 ​​hours)
3. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)
4. Opioid sedation (POSS)
5. Abdominal skin sensory area after 1 hour of blockade.
Overall study start date01/07/2024
Completion date30/09/2025

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Resident
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit70 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants60
Key inclusion criteria1. The patient is indicated for elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery
2. Patients are 18 to 70 years old
3. Patients' health status is assessed according to the Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation United States (ASA) at level I-III
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients addicted to opioid drugs
2. Do not understand the instructions for using the PCA device
3. History of chronic pain, anesthetic allergy
4. Obese patients have BMI over 30 kg/m²
5. The patient converted from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery
Date of first enrolment11/11/2024
Date of final enrolment30/06/2025

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Viet Nam

Study participating centre

Binh Dan Hospital, Hochiminh city
371 Dien Bien Phu - Ward 4 - District 3
Hochiminh city
700000
Viet Nam

Sponsor information

Binh Dan Hospital
Hospital/treatment centre

371 Dien Bien Phu - Ward 4 - District 3
Ho Chi Minh
700000
Viet Nam

Phone +84 28 3839 4747
Email bvbinhdan@hcm.vnn.vn
Website https://bvbinhdan.com.vn/

Funders

Funder type

University/education

University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City Medicine and Pharmacy University

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date30/06/2026
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryStored in non-publicly available repository
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a peer-reviewed journal
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request
hoinghibvbd@gmail.com
dr.toanvan@gmail.com

Editorial Notes

25/11/2024: Trial's existence confirmed by Ethics council in biomedical research, University of Medicine and Pharmacy.