Which method of pain relief is most effective for chest drain removal in postoperative cardiac patients?

ISRCTN ISRCTN36538293
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN36538293
Protocol serial number N0054119937
Sponsor Department of Health (UK)
Funder The Cardiothoracic Centre Liverpool NHS Trust (UK)
Submission date
12/09/2003
Registration date
12/09/2003
Last edited
17/12/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Signs and Symptoms
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr M Akrofi
Scientific

Department of Anaesthesia
The Cardiothoracic Centre
Liverpool NHS Trust
Thomas Drive
Liverpool
L14 3PE
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)151 228 1616

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesWhich of the currently available methods (entonox, intravenous morphine, subcutaneous bupivacaine) used for the control of analgesia during chest drain removal is most effective?
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSigns and Symptoms: Pain
InterventionPatients randomised to 50% entonox, 100 mcg/kg morphine and 0.5% bupivacaine.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

1. Pain scores after chest drain removal assessed by the short form McGill questionnaire 2. Effect of anaesthetic agent on length of intensive care unit stay

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Completion date15/07/2003

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexNot Specified
Target sample size at registration66
Key inclusion criteria66 patients receiving chest drain removal following major cardiac surgery.
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment15/07/2002
Date of final enrolment15/07/2003

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Department of Anaesthesia
Liverpool
L14 3PE
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/01/2005 Yes No