An analysis of 1+2+1 interventions (a brief therapy model) and its applications to a community mental health team (CMHT) setting
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN38856272 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN38856272 |
| Protocol serial number | RMH37 |
| Sponsor | NHS R&D Regional Programme Register - Department of Health (UK) |
| Funder | NHS Executive Northern and Yorkshire (UK) |
- Submission date
- 23/01/2004
- Registration date
- 23/01/2004
- Last edited
- 24/10/2019
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Mr Neville Row
Scientific
Scientific
Airedale NHS Trust
Bridge House
Bailey Hills Road
Bingley
BD16 2RJ
United Kingdom
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Scientific title | An analysis of 1+2+1 interventions (a brief therapy model) and its applications to a community mental health team (CMHT) setting |
| Study objectives | The objective is to test the hypothesis 'There is no significant difference in outcomes between limited interventions (i.e. 1+2+1) and non-limited interventions approaches to a specific team'. We are assessing a model of care and service delivery for suitability in treating people with stress/specific problem related issues. This is in order to safely decrease input/resources for individuals whose difficulties are less severe than those with enduring mental illness. At point of referral clients for whom the approach may be suitable are identified. They will be assessed at first appointment and if suitability is confirmed they will be randomly allocated to either a study group or a control group. The amount of care input into the control group would be variable with a traditional 'open-ended' number of sessions whilst input into the study group would be limited to three further sessions. Assessments would be made on both groups and the results compared. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Mental and behavioural disorders: depression, anxiety, neuroses |
| Intervention | 1. Limited intervention 2. Non-limited intervention |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Not provided at time of registration |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Not provided at time of registration |
| Completion date | 30/09/1997 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Not Specified |
| Sex | Not Specified |
| Key inclusion criteria | Not provided at time of registration |
| Key exclusion criteria | Not provided at time of registration |
| Date of first enrolment | 10/01/1995 |
| Date of final enrolment | 30/09/1997 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
Airedale NHS Trust
Bingley
BD16 2RJ
United Kingdom
BD16 2RJ
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Editorial Notes
24/10/2019: No publications found. All search options exhausted.
