Evaluating the effectiveness of a smartphone app to reduce alcohol consumption in hazardous and/or harmful drinkers
ISRCTN | ISRCTN40104069 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN40104069 |
Secondary identifying numbers | N/A |
- Submission date
- 10/02/2016
- Registration date
- 13/02/2016
- Last edited
- 17/12/2018
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
Drinking too much alcohol (excessive alcohol consumption) is responsible for around 3.3 million deaths worldwide each year and costs the UK economy approximately £21 billion per year. Tackling excessive alcohol consumption is a public health priority and there is a need for interventions (programmes) to help people reduce the amount of alcohol they are drinking. This study is intended to test whether a smartphone app with five different sets of features can help people reduce the amount of alcohol they drink.
Who can participate?
Participants must be aged 18 and over, live in the UK, be classified as hazardous and/or harmful drinkers, want to make a serious attempt to reduce their drinking and provide an email address for them to be contacted through.
What does the study involve?
The app being tested, the Drink Less app, allows all users to set goals. The five different sets of features are: self-monitoring and feedback, action planning, normative feedback (comparison of a person’s behaviour compared with what society expects); cognitive bias re-training (changing behaviour),and identity change. They exist in two forms – a ‘full’ version and a ‘minimal’ version. The full version contains all the elements that the researchers think will work and the minimal version contains a small number of features. The performance of the app is assessed by comparing the number of people who reduce how much they drink in each group. On downloading the smartphone app, Drink Less, participants are randomised to one of the 32 different experimental conditions (every combination of the ‘full’ and ‘minimal’ versions of the five modules. All participants are sent a questionnaire to answer one month after they have downloaded the app. This questionnaire asks about the participants drinking habits and how they find using the app.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
This smartphone app should help people reduce their drinking. There are no predicted risks of taking part in the study.
Where is the study run from?
University College London (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
March 2016 to July 2016
Who is funding the study?
1. National Institute for Health Research School of Public Health Research
2. UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies
3. Society for the Study of Addiction
Who is the main contact?
1. Dr Claire Garnett (scientific)
c.garnett.12@ucl.ac.uk
2. Dr David Crane (scientific)
david.crane@ucl.ac.uk
3. Dr Jamie Brown (scientific)
jamie.brown@ucl.ac.uk
Contact information
Scientific
University College London
1-19 Torrington Place
London
WC1E 7HB
United Kingdom
0000-0002-6589-299X | |
Phone | +44 (0)20 7679 5682 |
c.garnett.12@ucl.ac.uk |
Scientific
University College London
1-19 Torrington Place
London
WC1E 7HB
United Kingdom
0000-0002-9755-0214 | |
Phone | +44 (0)20 7687 0723 |
david.crane@ucl.ac.uk |
Scientific
University College London
1-19 Torrington Place
London
WC1E 7HB
United Kingdom
0000-0002-2797-5428 | |
Phone | +44 (0)20 3108 3179 |
jamie.brown@ucl.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Between-subject factorial randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Internet/virtual |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | http://drinklessalcohol.com/info-sheet.html |
Scientific title | Evaluating the effectiveness of five intervention modules within a smartphone app to reduce excessive alcohol consumption: protocol for a randomised control trial |
Study hypothesis | Participants randomly assigned to receive access to an intervention module (self-monitoring & feedback; action planning; normative feedback; cognitive bias re-training; identity change) within the smartphone app will reduce their consumption of alcohol more than those who do not receive access. |
Ethics approval(s) | UCL Ethics Committee under the ‘optimisation and implementation of interventions to change health-related behaviours’ project, 31/10/2014, ref: CEHP/2013/508 |
Condition | Harmful or hazardous alcohol consumption |
Intervention | A smartphone app with five experimental intervention modules and one intervention module (setting and recording goals) provided to all users. 1. Self-monitoring & feedback 1.1. High Ability to record drinks, graph showing units consumed, calories consumed, amount spent on alcohol. Monitor mood, productivity, clarity and sleep quality, graph illustrating how they differ on mornings after heavy drinking compared to mornings after light/no drinking. Feedback on progress towards goals: cumulatively as the week progresses, on the past week and on all previous weeks. 1.2. Low Ability to record drinks, single graph showing units consumed. No other self-monitoring facilitated or feedback provided. 2. Action planning 2.1. High Create implementation intentions, review implementation intentions already created, gain understanding of why to set implementation intentions. 2.2. Low Gain understanding of why to set implementation intentions only. 3. Normative feedback 3.1. High Questions assessing how users think they compare with others. Infographics illustrating how user’s drinking actually compares with other adults and others of same gender and age. 3.2. Low Text on risks of drinking too much (from Public Health England website). 4. Cognitive bias re-training 4.1. High Cognitive bias modification game with users “avoiding” all alcohol related pictures and “approaching” soft drink pictures. Text included on why and how this sort of game is believed to work. 4.2. Low Game without contingency rule that all alcohol related pictures are association with “avoid”, in this version, 50% of alcohol related pictures are associated with “avoid” and 50% associated with “approach”. Same for soft drink pictures. 5. Identity change 5.1. High Memos – record messages about drinking or when drunk too much to watch in the future. “I am” – identifying and considering those values that are important to you, and whether you do not live up to those values when you have drunk too much. Flipsides of drinking – providing examples of the negative sides of positive alcohol expectancies. 5.2. Low Text on how identity is an important factor in how we behave and advise to think about the undesired consequences of drinking too much. On downloading the smartphone app, participants will have to provide informed consent, socio-demographic data, indicate their reason for using the app, provide their e-mail address (for the one-month follow-up questionnaire) and complete the full AUDIT questionnaire. After this they are provided with their AUDIT score and informed of their ‘AUDIT risk zone’. At this point, all participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomised to one of 32 unique experimental conditions in a block randomisation method. From this point onwards, the app differs for the different experimental conditions. One month after downloading the app users will be emailed a follow-up questionnaire. If this is not completed, email reminders will be sent at periodic intervals (two days and one week). The follow-up questionnaire consists of the AUDIT and questions regarding satisfaction ratings for the app. |
Intervention type | Behavioural |
Primary outcome measure | Change in past week consumption of alcohol, calculated from the AUDIT ( Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test) questions 1, 2, and 3, measured at baseline (on point of app download) and at one month follow-up. An intention-to-treat approach will be used such that those who are lost to follow-up will be retained in the primary analysis and assumed to be drinking at baseline levels. |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Change in AUDIT score, assessed via measuring the difference between baseline and follow-up score on AUDIT 2. App usage data; measured by the number of screens viewed by each participant, the number of times they accessed the app and the mean time using the app 3. Usability ratings for the app: 3.1. How helpful did you find Drink Less? 3.2. How easy did you find Drink Less to use? 3.3. How satisfied are you with Drink Less? 3.4. How likely are you to recommend Drink Less to a friend? All usability ratings will be on a 5-point scale (1: Not at all, 2: Slightly, 3: Somewhat, 4: Very, 5: Extremely). |
Overall study start date | 01/03/2016 |
Overall study end date | 28/08/2016 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Other |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 672 – 21 participants per experimental condition |
Participant inclusion criteria | 1. Aged 18 or over 2. Live in the UK 3. Have an AUDIT score between 8 and above (added 17/03/2016) 4. Confirmed they are making a serious attempt to reduce their drinking 5. Provided an email address Initial inclusion criteria information: 3. Have an AUDIT score between 8 and 19 (inclusive) |
Participant exclusion criteria | Does not meet inclusion criteria |
Recruitment start date | 18/05/2016 |
Recruitment end date | 10/07/2016 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
University/education
1-19 Torrington Place
London
WC1E 7HB
England
United Kingdom
https://ror.org/02jx3x895 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
No information available
No information available
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | 16/09/2017 |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
Publication and dissemination plan | The trialists are intending to publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal by the end of September 2017. The results have been disseminated at two national conferences (UK Society for Behavioural Medicine Annual Conference in December 2016 and Centre for Behaviour Change Digital Health Conference in February 2017) and will be presented at an international conference (INEBRIA) in September 2017. |
IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Claire Garnett (c.garnett.12@ucl.ac.uk). Type of data: categorical and numerical data, anonymised data on the socio-demographic and drinking characteristics of participants and data on all outcome measures. Data will become available once the evaluation paper has been published in a peer-reviewed journal. There is no planned end date on which data will become unavailable. Data will be open access on Open Science Framework for anyone to access. Researchers can use the data for any types of analyses, and any mechanism. Consent was obtained from participants prior to the study. Each participant was assigned a unique number that was used to label all information. All data from the study was treated as strictly confidential and handled in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998. |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol article | protocol | 08/07/2016 | Yes | No | |
Results article | results | 12/03/2018 | Yes | No | |
Results article | secondary analysis rresults | 14/12/2018 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
17/12/2018: Publication reference added.
10/04/2018: Publication reference added.
17/07/2017: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall trial end date was changed from 01/07/2016 to 28/08/2016.
2. The recruitment start date was changed from 01/03/2016 to 18/05/2016.
3. The recruitment end date was changed from 01/06/2016 to 10/07/2016.
11/07/2016: Publication reference added.
17/03/2016: Amended participant inclusion criteria.