A paediatric intensive care study comparing the use of non-absorbable antibiotics and standard infection control to prevent secondary infection in critically ill children

ISRCTN ISRCTN40310490
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN40310490
IRAS number 239324
Secondary identifying numbers CPMS 44969, IRAS 239324
Submission date
14/10/2020
Registration date
30/10/2020
Last edited
01/03/2024
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Each year, around 20,000 children are admitted to paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the UK. Critically ill children are at a higher risk of hospital-acquired infections. Many of these infections are caused by ‘bad’ bacteria in the digestive tract, such as those in the mouth and stomach. Normally there are higher levels of ‘good’ bacteria in the digestive tract. When someone is very poorly, the number of ‘bad’ bacteria may rise and spread to other organs. This can then cause severe illnesses, such as pneumonia and sepsis, and lead to long-term health problems, increased hospital costs and even death.

All PICUs have several methods to reduce the risk of hospital-acquired infections, such as providing antibacterial gel on units. One possible method is to treat patients with antibiotics that stop the growth of bacteria in the digestive tract. This treatment is called selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD). It has been shown in adults to reduce the number of hospital-acquired infections and improve survival. However, it is unclear if it works in children.

As large clinical trials are expensive, it is important to be confident that a trial can be done and that the different components of the trial can all work together. Before embarking on a full trial, we will conduct an 18-month feasibility study including a pilot trial. A feasibility study is a piece of research done before the main trial to answer the question “Can this trial be done?” and is used to estimate important factors such as willingness of patients to take part. A pilot trial is a miniature version of the full trial and is done to check that the different components, such as recruiting patients, delivering treatment and follow-up, all run smoothly.

Our aim is to compare giving SDD with not giving SDD (usual care) in children admitted to an NHS PICU. We also need to be sure that if SDD is used, it does not lead to a rise in resistance to antibiotics either in the patient or in the whole community

Who can participate?
A child can participate in the study if they are admitted to one of the 6 PICUs taking part in the trial and are expected to be on a breathing machine for at least 48 hours. We plan to include up to 324 patients and estimate 90 will receive SDD.

This study will also involve conducting interviews with parents of participating children to understand whether the study was acceptable to them, review how they were approached and the information provided, and what outcome measures are most important to them.


What does the study involve?
Six PICUs will be randomly assigned to either deliver, or not, SDD to eligible patients. All PICUs will start off not delivering SDD. Then halfway through, 3 of the PICUs will switch to delivering SDD. This type of study is known as a cluster randomised controlled trial. It ensures that the two groups of units, and the patients in those units, are as similar as possible, except for the delivery and receipt of SDD. It therefore allows us to see whether SDD is any more or less beneficial than the usual care given in the NHS. We will also monitor levels of antibiotic resistant bacteria in all participating PICUs by taking swabs from patients.

SDD is a mixture of antibiotic and antifungal in paste and liquid forms given in the following ways:
• A pea-sized amount of paste in your child’s mouth
• 0.5 - 2 teaspoons of liquid through their feeding tube
This is done four times a day until the child no longer needs help from the ventilator.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
SDD a treatment that can be used to reduce the number of bacteria within the gut which prevents any “bad” bacteria moving to other organs and causing serious infections. There are very few risks to a child from taking part. SDD has been in use for more than 30 years and is routine practice in many hospitals. The paste can taste a little bitter but will stop being used once the child is no longer ventilated.

Where is the study run from?
Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
April 2020 to October 2022

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme (project number: 16/152/01)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Nazima Pathan, np409@medschl.cam.ac.uk

Study website

Contact information

Dr Nazima Pathan
Scientific

Department of Paediatrics
University of Cambridge
Level 8, Addenbrookes Hospital
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-9447-4252
Phone +44 (0)20 7269 9277
Email picnic@icnarc.org

Study information

Study designInterventional cluster randomized case controlled study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designCluster randomised trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA pilot cluster randomised clinical trial of the use of selective gut decontamination in critically ill children: Paediatric Intensive Care and Infection Control (PICnIC)
Study acronymPICnIC
Study hypothesisPICniC is a feasibility study designed to determine whether it is possible to conduct a cluster randomised trial (cRCT) of Selective Decontamination of the Digestive tract (SDD) in critically ill children who are likely to be ventilated for >48 hours, and to explore and test the acceptability of key components of the study to healthcare professionals and families of patients.
Ethics approval(s)Approved 23/09/2020, West Midlands – Black Country Research and Ethics Committee (The Old Chapel, Royal Standard Place, Nottingham, NG1 6FS, UK; +44 (0)207 104 8010; blackcountry.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 20/WM/0061
ConditionDigestive tract infection in critically ill children
InterventionThe PICnIC study is a pilot, parallel group cluster randomised clinical trial (cRCT) that includes an integrated mixed methods study. We will discuss the cRCT and mixed-methods separately. The whole study has designed as a miniature version of a potential definitive cRCT and will test feasibility and the study procedures.

cRCT
Participating sites will undergo an 8-week baseline period of usual care, during which sites will be randomised to either continuing usual care (control) or delivering SDD (intervention) in the second 8-week period. There will be a 2-week transition period between the delivery of usual care and starting the intervention. The trial is unblinded, SDD will become usual practice for participating PICUs randomised to deliver the intervention.

There will be three 1-week observational ecological assessments over the course of the study: pre-trial; during the transition period; post-trial.

Eligible patients will be:
1. AgeD >37 weeks (corrected gestational age) and <16 years
2. Receiving mechanical ventilation expected to last at least 48 h (and expected to remain so until the day after tomorrow)
All patients admitted to the study PICU during the ecological surveillance weeks will be included, regardless of their ventilation status.

The intervention will be started in all eligible patients as it will form part of the standard infection control strategy in the participating PICU. In addition to usual care, the follow SDD regimen will be adopted:
1. A 6-hourly topical, application of a pea-sized (0.5 g) amount of paste to the mouth
2. A 6-hourly administration of liquid given via the existing feeding tube into the stomach via the nose. The amount of liquid given will vary based on the child’s age between half a teaspoon – 2 teaspoons (2.5 – 10 ml)
Treatment will be given 30 minutes before feeds, where feeding is not continuous. This dosing regimen is based on that in use in a UK PICU for a period of over 10 years. The intervention will start in all eligible patients within 6 h of the child fulfilling the inclusion criteria. It will continue until the patient is extubated or for 30 days, whichever is sooner.

Readmitted patients will continue to receive the intervention, as it will form part of the standard care bundle but would not be counted as a separate enrolment.

Per standard practice, routine surveillance swabs will be taken from all patients on admission. Additional surveillance swabs will then be taken twice-weekly until discharge (or on the day of discharge for admission durations less than 7 days). Samples taken will be:
1. Respiratory
2. Urine
3. Stool or rectal
4. Wound (where present)

Data collection will be restricted to data required to address the objectives. Where possible, data will be obtained from standard data collection via PICAnet to maximise efficiency. A number of additional data points will be collected to inform possible outcomes for a definitive trial (duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, days alive and free of mechanical ventilation censored at 30 days, infectious episodes during PICU admission, total antibiotic usage in PICU, duration of PICU stay and hospital stay, mortality at PICU discharge and 30 days post-randomisation).
Adverse events will be monitored and reported up to 30 days post-randomisation.


Mixed Methods study
Health Care Professionals
All health care professionals currently working in a UK PICU will be invited to take part in an online survey. Additionally, focus groups will be held with healthcare professionals from two of the participating PICUs, with opportunities for telephone interviews for those unable to attend the group.
These will explore health care professionals’ views on:
• acceptability of the trial design including selection of, and adherence to, the SDD intervention;
• acceptability of recruitment and deferred consent procedures in the trial; and
• acceptability of the overall trial procedures.

Parents/Guardians
The parents/guardians of each recruited child will be asked to complete a short, anonymous questionnaire which will seek their experiences of:
• recruitment and emergency consent;
• content and format of the PIS;
• decision-making in the PICU setting; and
• acceptability of the overall trial procedures.

Parents/guardians will also be invited to take part in a more detailed telephone interview. Interviews will be completed until data saturation (anticipated to be 15-25 based on previous studies).
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Colistin, tobramycin, nystatin
Primary outcome measureFeasibility outcomes:
1. Adherence to the SDD intervention assessed by the proportion of eligible children allocated to the intervention that receive SDD using case report forms
2. Estimation of recruitment rate measured using ...
3. Questionnaires and interviews will be used to explore parents/legal representatives’ views on: the acceptability of conducting a definitive trial; the content and understanding of the information materials; acceptability of the recruitment and consenting procedures; and the selection of important, relevant, patient-centred, primary and secondary outcomes for a definitive trial.
4. Two focus groups and up to 10 interviews with practitioners involved in the pilot cRCT, as well as an online survey of all UK PICU staff will be used to assess: the acceptability of the implementation of the SDD intervention; interest in participation in a definitive trial in the wider PICU community; the acceptability of the recruitment and consenting procedures for the definitive trial; and the acceptability of collecting data for assessing the selected clinical and ecological outcomes
Secondary outcome measuresThere are no secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date01/04/2020
Overall study end date31/10/2022

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient, Health professional
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit37 Weeks
Upper age limit16 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 324; UK Sample Size: 324
Total final enrolment361
Participant inclusion criteriaPilot cRCT:
1. Aged >37 weeks (corrected gestational age) and <16 years
2. Receiving mechanical ventilation expected to last at least 48 h (and expected to remain so until the day after tomorrow)

Mixed methods study:
3. Online survey/telephone interviews: All health care professionals working in a PICU within the UK
4. Focus Groups: All healthcare professionals working in the two PICUs selected for focus groups
5. Survey/telephone interviews: Parents/legal representatives of all recruited patients
Participant exclusion criteria1. Known allergy, sensitivity or interaction to polymyxin E, tobramycin, or nystatin
2. Known to be pregnant
3. Death perceived as imminent
Recruitment start date20/09/2021
Recruitment end date13/02/2022

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

Addenbrookes Hosital
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom
Birmingham Children’s Hospital
Steelhouse Lane
Birmingham
B4 6NH
United Kingdom
John Radcliffe Hopsital
Headley Way
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom
Southampton General Hospital
Tremona Road
Southampton
SO16 6YD
United Kingdom
Bristol Royal Hospital for Children
Upper Maudlin Street
Bristol
BS2 8BJ
United Kingdom
St. Georges Hospital
Blackshaw Road
London
SW17 0QT
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Hospital/treatment centre

Addenbrookes Hospital
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1233 245151
Email research@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
Website http://www.cuh.org.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04v54gj93

Funders

Funder type

Government

NIHR Evaluation, Trials and Studies Co-ordinating Centre (NETSCC); Grant Codes: 16/152/01

No information available

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK)
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Research, NIHRresearch, NIHR - National Institute for Health Research, NIHR (The National Institute for Health and Care Research), NIHR
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date30/04/2023
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planThe Protocol will be uploaded to website https://www.icnarc.org/Our-Research/Studies/Picnic/About

The Final Report will be submitted to the NIHR HTA Programme for publication in Health Technology Assessment. The findings from PICnIC will also be published in appropriate peer reviewed scientific journals and relevant professional journals.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article 11/03/2022 14/03/2022 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No
Results article 07/12/2023 11/12/2023 Yes No
Results article 01/02/2024 01/03/2024 Yes No

Editorial Notes

01/03/2024: Publication reference added.
11/12/2023: Publication reference added.
02/02/2023: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall trial end date was changed from 31/05/2022 to 31/10/2022.
2. The intention to publish date was changed from 31/08/2022 to 30/04/2023.
12/04/2022: The following changes have been made:
1. The final enrolment number has been added.
2. The overall trial end date has been changed from 31/03/2022 to 31/05/2022 and the plain English summary updated accordingly.
14/03/2022: Publication reference added.
04/02/2022: The recruitment end date was changed from 06/02/2022 to 13/02/2022.
09/09/2021: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment start date was changed from 21/06/2021 to 20/09/2021.
2. The recruitment end date was changed from 17/10/2021 to 06/02/2022.
3. The overall trial end date was changed from 30/09/2021 to 31/03/2022.
4. The intention to publish date was changed from 30/09/2022 to 31/08/2022.
04/06/2021: The recruitment start date was changed from 01/06/2021 to 21/06/2021.
27/01/2021: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment start date was changed from 01/02/2021 to 01/06/2021.
2. The recruitment end date was changed from 19/04/2021 to 17/10/2021.
23/11/2020: The recruitment start date was changed from 30/11/2020 to 01/02/2021.
14/10/2020: Trial’s existence confirmed by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)