Difference in indometacin and prednisolone in the treatment of gouty arthritis

ISRCTN ISRCTN45724113
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN45724113
Secondary identifying numbers CRE-2008.466-T
Submission date
15/01/2010
Registration date
03/02/2010
Last edited
24/02/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Chi Hung Cheng
Scientific

Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Prince of Wales Hospital
Shatin, NT
852
Hong Kong

Study information

Study designMulticentre double-blind randomised trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleComparison of oral prednisolone and oral indometacin in the treatment of acute gout-like arthritis: a multicentre double-blind randomised trial
Study hypothesisOral prednisolone is as effective as indometacin in treating gouty arthritis with less side effects.
Ethics approval(s)The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong - New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee, 19/12/2008, ref: CRE-2008.466-T
ConditionGouty arthritis
InterventionIn Group 1 each patient will initially receive indometacin 50 mg orally, and six tablets of prednisolone-like placebo orally, and will then be observed for 120 minutes. Subsequently, the patient will be given a five day prescription of indometacin (50 mg orally eight hourly for two days follow by indometacin 25 mg eight hourly for another three days), and six tablets of prednisolone-like placebo once a day.

In Group 2 each patient will initially receive prednisolone 30 mg (six 5 mg tablets) orally, and indometacin-like placebo (two tablets) orally, and will then be observed for 120 minutes. After the initial treatment and observation, the patient will then be given a five day prescription of indometacin-like placebo (two tablets eight hourly for two days follow by one tablet eight hourly for a further three days) and prednisolone 30 mg orally once per day for five days.

All patients will be prescribed paracetamol 1 g six-hourly to be taken as required.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Prednisolone, indometacin
Primary outcome measureCharted daily up to 14 days after the medication started:
1. Analgesic efficacy
2. Presence or absence of adverse effects
Secondary outcome measuresCharted daily up to 14 days after the medication started:
1. 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36) score
2. Joint stiffness
3. Joint swelling
4. Joint tenderness
5. Length of hospital stay
6. Paracetamol use
7. Relapse rate within 14 days
Overall study start date01/01/2010
Overall study end date31/12/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants100 per centre, total of 400
Participant inclusion criteria1. Aged greater than 18 years, either sex
2. Presenting to the Emergency Department between 9 am and 4 pm, Monday to Friday, from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2011 with an acute arthritis suggestive of gout
3. Present within 3 days of symptom onset
4. Have a clinical diagnosis of an acute monoarthritis suggestive of gout
5. For the purpose of this study the diagnosis of acute gout is made if BOTH of the following TWO criteria are met:
5.1. Criteria 1: The presence of rapid onset of severe pain, swelling, tenderness and erythema of an affected joint, which is maximal by 6 to 12 hours
5.2. Criteria 2: The presence of one or more of the following:
5.2.1. Metatarsal-phalangeal (MTP) joint involvement (podagra); or
5.2.2. Knee or ankle joint involvement; or wrist or elbow joint involvement WITH either:
5.2.2.1. Gouty tophi present, or
5.2.2.2. Previous joint aspiration confirming the diagnosis of gout, or
5.2.2.3. The presence of hyperuricaemia, or
5.2.2.4. A clinical history of one or more clinical gouty arthritis attack
If none of B1 to B4 is present then we will seek to confirm the diagnosis by visual and microscopic examination of joint aspirate containing crystals.

Although joint aspiration and confirmation of the presence of uric acid crystals is not mandatory for inclusion in this study, nevertheless every patient will be asked whether they will consent to joint aspiration. Records will be kept of those that do and do not agree, and of those patients where aspiration is successful or unsuccessful.
Participant exclusion criteria1. Suspicion of sepsis or other joint disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis)
2. Follow up is not possible because of lack of transport or lack of telephone contact
3. Any significant co-morbidity which would interfere with assessment
4. Dementia
5. Confusion
6. Active gastrointestinal symptoms
7. Renal insufficiency with serum creatinine greater than 200 umol/L
8. Bleeding disorder
9. Warfarin
10. Allergy to a study drug
11. Joint aspirate which excluded the diagnosis of gout

It is often not possible to definitively separate gout from septic arthritis on clinical grounds alone, but for this study, sepsis is likely if the patient has a temperature greater than 38°C, chills or rigors, a wound near to the affected joint, a history of immunosuppression, erythematous tracking along a lymphatic vessel or vein in the affected limb, lymphadenopathy, or a previous history of septic arthritis.
Recruitment start date01/01/2010
Recruitment end date31/12/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Hong Kong

Study participating centre

The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Shatin, NT
852
Hong Kong

Sponsor information

Health, Welfare and Food Bureau (Hong Kong)
Government

Research Office
Government Secretariat
18/F, Murray Building
Garden Road
-
852
Hong Kong

Website http://www.fhb.gov.hk/en/index.html
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03qh32912

Funders

Funder type

Government

Health and Health Services Research Fund (HHSRF) (Hong Kong) - Special Administrative Region

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 05/04/2016 Yes No

Editorial Notes

24/02/2016: Publication reference added.