Laparoscopic assisted reversal of ileostomy versus traditional open reversal

ISRCTN ISRCTN46101203
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN46101203
Secondary identifying numbers NA
Submission date
06/06/2010
Registration date
11/11/2010
Last edited
30/10/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr Paul Neary
Scientific

Dept of Surgery
AMNCH Tallaght
Dublin
24
Ireland

Email paulcneary@msn.com

Study information

Study designSingle centre two arm randomised active controlled parallel group trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleLaparoscopic assisted reversal of ileostomy versus traditional open reversal: a pilot study
Study acronymLARI
Study objectivesTo show that laparoscopic assisted reversal of ileostomy versus traditional open reduces hospital stay and morbidity.
Discharge criteria: having tolerated 2 large meals without nausea/vomiting, passed a bowel motion and adequate pain control on oral analgesia

Please note that as of 14/09/2012, the following changes were made to the record:
1. The scientific title of this trial was changed from "Laparoscopic assisted reversal of ileostomy versus traditional open reversal: a randomised control trial"
2. The target number of participants was changed from 46 to 70
Ethics approval(s)The Adelaide and Meath incorporating the National Children's Hospital (AMNCH) Ethics Committee, Tallaght Hospital approved on the 23rd of February 2010
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedIleostomy
InterventionPatients undergoing surgery for reversal of ileostomy will be randomised to receive either:
1. Traditional: Ileostomy mobolised from skin. Ileostomy excised followed by side to side anastomosis using GIA. Fascia and peritoneum closed and wound left to heal by secondary intention.
2. Laparoscopic assisted: Ileostomy mobolised from skin. Ileostomy excised followed by side to side anastomosis using GIA. One 5 mm port inserted contra-laterally with pneumoperitoneum. Reversal site checked for any omentum or bowel stuck to sutures. The whole abdominal cavity will be checked for any evidence of metastatic disease. Extra 5mm ports inserted and any adhesions present will be divided as well as any further intervention.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureLength of stay
Secondary outcome measuresMorbidity, Diagnostic tool
Overall study start date01/10/2009
Completion date30/06/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit85 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants46
Key inclusion criteria1. Any person with a loop ileostomy who has been passed fit for surgery
2. Age 18-85
Key exclusion criteria1. Inability to give informed consent (eg. Dementia)
2. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) greater than 3
Date of first enrolment01/10/2009
Date of final enrolment30/06/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Ireland

Study participating centre

Dept of Surgery
Dublin
24
Ireland

Sponsor information

Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Incorporating the National Children's Hospital (AMNCH) (Ireland)
Not defined

c/o Mr Paul Neary
Dept of Surgery
Dublin
24
Ireland

Email paulcneary@msn.com
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01fvmtt37

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Incorporating the National Children's Hospital (AMNCH) (Ireland) - departmental and personal funds

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/09/2013 Yes No